Another vaccine, Another lie, Another day in Government.

How many vaccines can a small baby tolerate? One, two, eight maybe? Are our babies to become the Governments personal experimental pincushions? The British Government are now considering yet another vaccine for the vaccine schedule. They are considering including the Hepatitis B vaccine at eight weeks old. Well, actually they are not considering anything because they no longer decide on vaccine schedules as they handed that responsibility over to the JCVI Joint Committee of Vaccination and Imunisation on the 1st April 2009, you remember the JCVI, they are the committee with links to the drugs companies and that have experts who discuss vaccines and their adverse reactions in depth at meetings held in private and then stand up in court and say that mothers have killed their babies and vaccines could not have played a part in the death ?

How can the public trust Governments that lie to us?

Lie number one

The spokesman for the British Governments Department of Health has said to the Daily Mail that

"The safety of children is always paramount whenever decisions are taken regarding what vaccines are included as part of the child vaccination programme"

However the Hepatitis B virus is most commonly transmitted through blood-to-blood contact.

This may be through unprotected sexual intercourse, the sharing of contaminated needles by drugs users, accidental injury with a contaminated needle,if needles used for tattooing, body piercing or acupuncture are contaminated, and sharing razors.

So how many babies of eight weeks are going catch the Hepatitis B virus in the first place? Babies born to mothers who have the virus already have this vaccine at birth.

We have to think rationally about the balance of how many babies are at risk from Hepatitis B and the risks of the vaccine itself.

Hepatitis B after all is a very serious illness.

The hepatitis B virus can cause an acute illness that resolves itself quickly without causing long-term liver damage. However, it can also cause a chronic illness that lasts more than six months, sometimes for life, with symptoms that come and go.This may cause cirrosis and liver cancer..

On balance, many experts would say that given the amount of babies at risk from Hepatitis B at eight weeks old this is an unnecessary vaccine.

Lie number two

The British Governments Department of Health states that

"The safety of children is always paramount whenever decisions are taken regarding what vaccines are included as part of the child vaccination programme."

However under the new law which came into effect on 1st April for England only, the Secretary of State has no power on the grounds of safety to refuse to implement or reverse any Joint Committe on Vaccination and Immunisation recommendation

So therefore the British Governments Department of Health are not making any decisions themselves they are relying on a committee whose members have links to the drugs companies who make the vaccines and whose experts have been seen to lie in court, to make these decisions for them.

Lie number three

The British Government say the Hepatitis B vaccine is a safe vaccine to add into the vaccine schedule and yet on the CHS (Child Health Safety) website we find a very different opinion.

"A - EDITED NEWS RELEASE ON HAZARDS OF HEPATITIS B VACCINE

Dr. Marc Girard - News Release

September 27, 2005

London, England & Versailles, France [27] September 2005/Romeike/

Strong scientific evidence confirms British infants will be exposed to an unacceptably high risk of complications, including multiple sclerosis, if the British Medical Association's (BMA's) recent universal infant hepatitis B vaccine recommendation goes ahead.

In a new paper now in press and available on line (Med Hypotheses, doi 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.08.012), Dr Marc Girard, a specialist in the side effects of drugs and commissioned as a medical expert by French courts in the French criminal investigation into the introduction of universal Hepatitis B vaccination in France, suggests that even in high-endemic countries, the risk/benefit ratio of what he describes as "this unusually toxic vaccine" must be carefully re-assessed.

Regarding the health situation in the UK Dr Girard says the conclusion not to vaccinate is obvious. France was the first country to implement universal hepatitis B vaccination in 1994.

Whilst other evidence is embargoed by the French Courts, Dr. Marc Girard has also been able to publish a scientific review of the unembargoed evidence of the vaccine's hazards (Autoimmun Rev 2005; 4: 96-100). Dr Girard shows that French health authorities suppress studies demonstrating serious risks.

His new paper reviews the various mechanisms likely to account for the biological plausibility of auto-immune disorders such as demyelinating diseases and other hazards of this vaccine.

Legal and ethical concerns also arise over the BMA's recommendation because those at high risk from the hepatitis B virus are not infants but promiscuous adults engaging in unsafe sex and intravenous drug abusers. There is no clear individual clinical benefit of universal hepatitis B vaccination. The duration of any protective effect is uncertain whereas the vaccination carries with it risks of numerous chronic auto-immune disorders, including Guillain-Barre syndrome, lupus, rheumatism, blood disorders and chronic fatigue.

In contrast, the BMA's 10th May 2005 press release stated children were at risk of hepatitis B infection from:

biting and shared toys

shared toothbrushes and razors

mother to child transmission during birth"

Dr Girard said:

"The BMA's recommendation is a surprising and unexpected change of heart given the scathing public scepticism in the British Medical Journal in 1996 to a pharmaceutical company promotion advocating universal infant hepatitis B vaccination (BMJ 1996; 313: 825). It is all the more surprising because whilst the risk factors for babies have changed little, there is now impressive evidence that for a preventive measure, hepatitis B vaccine is remarkable for the frequency, variety and severity of complications from its use. The toxicity of this vaccine is so unusual that, even if crucial data are regrettably concealed or covered by Court order, scientific evidence is already far higher than normally needed to justify severe restrictive measures."

Additionally if the Hepatitis B vaccine is so safe then why have 6 separate Hepatitis vaccines had their licences removed?

In the Daily Mail article it states that the cases of Hepatitis B are spiralling in Britain, later it goes on to say

"The driving force behind the change is concern that infected immigrants are contributing to a rising tide of hepatitis B".

Wouldn't it be cheaper and safer for a screening of all immigrants for Hepatitis B before they enter the country to take place?

On The Age of Autism website is the story of what happened to a baby named Ian. He was vaccinated with the Hepatitis B vaccine and sadly died the most painful and horrific death as a direct consequence of having this vaccine. This was because Ian had an undiagnosed allergy to Bakers Yeast before he was vaccinated.

"Anyone with a life-threatening allergy to baker´s yeast, or to any other component of the vaccine, should not get hepatitis B vaccine.

Anyone who has had a life-threatening allergic reaction to a previous dose of hepatitis B vaccine should not get another dose.

Anyone who is moderately or severely ill when a dose of vaccine is scheduled should probably wait until they recover before getting the vaccine. Your provider can give you more information about these precautions.."

This is exactly how he died.

FACT: After receiving the Hepatitis B shot these symptoms also appeared:

Platelets dropped from 248,000 to 131,000 – severe thrombocytopenia

Scalded-like rash appeared

Seizures noted

Irritable, crying non-stop

Stopped eating

Viral-like symptoms

Within 12 hours of his vaccination he had the rash, within 24 hours the severe thrombocytopenia set in, and then he was in a fatal state from then on. NO DOCTORS, NURSES, STAFF would even consider the vaccination as the source.

Little Ian swelled up like a balloon. The pain he suffered must have been unimaginable.

Will the British Government have every child screened for Bakers Yeast Allergy before they allow this vaccination? Have they ever made sure a full allergy screening takes place before vaccinating any child? No, of course not, they will just add yet another vaccine to the 32 vaccines that a child now has before the age of four years old.

The British Government is prepared to sit back and lie to us telling us that this vaccine is safe. Well, this vaccine certainly was not very safe for little Ian, now was it? It is not safe for any child with a Bakers Yeast allergy and they are playing Russian Roulette with each and every babies life because they do not know which babies have this allergy and which do not.

Ian's mother had this to say:-

"Ian lived for 47 days.My son suffered nearly his entire life. Look at the pictures.(these are on Age of Autism) Imagine watching your child going through this pain and not being able to do anything. No one would listen to us….we are just parents, what do we know? We didn´t leave his side for one moment. We lived at the hospital, literally. I couldn´t save my first born son, I couldn´t make the ´ouchie´ better.I sat there day in and day out and watched this vaccination destroy his organ one at a time."

Dr Colette Harman had this to say on the Hepatitis B Vaccine

"children younger than 14 are 3 times more likely to die or suffer adverse reactions after receiving hepatitis B vaccine than to catch the disease."

For other links to sites explaining adverse reactions including death to this vaccination Profitable Harm has a full page on Hepatitis B vaccine as does Whale to website.

Daniel Moore MD writes

"Jan 18 2009

Millions of routine childhood vaccinations are given every year in the United States; allergic reactions from these vaccines are extremely rare. However, some people with certain food allergies may be at higher risk for allergic reactions as a result of vaccines containing certain food proteins.

Up to 8% of children suffer from food allergies, with egg being one of the most common foods to which children are allergic. Many routine childhood immunizations contain traces of egg protein or other food ingredients. As a result, there is the possibility that a child with food allergies will experience anaphylaxis (a severe allergic reaction) as a result of receiving a vaccination. "

He also says:-

"Baker´s Yeast

Certain vaccines are synthesized by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which is the common bakers' yeast used for making bread. Routine childhood vaccines containing baker´s yeast include hepatitis B, and any combination vaccine that contains hepatitis B.

Any person who has experienced an allergic reaction after eating food products containing baker´s yeast should not be given hepatitis B vaccine. However, as is the case with egg-containing vaccines in egg-allergic people, yeast-containing vaccines may be able to be given to yeast-allergic people under the direct supervision of a physician."

The problem is, how many babies of eight weeks old have experienced eating anything? They are on milk. Some could argue that breast milk contains foods with yeast in, which is spot on but many babies at the age of eight weeks already are showing signs of allergies with eczema and asthma and there is no way of telling without tests whether this is caused through food allergies or not.

Are we actually keeping our children healthy by allowing these vaccines or are we actually poisoning their little bodies with every needle that pierces their skin?

Governments may be prepared to take the risk but are we?