Resume Rewrites
Robert A. Hall, MEd, CAE
March 16, 2009
In my 36-year professional career, I´ve always been the hiring authority, both in my first post-college job as a state senator, and for the last 26 years as an association executive. In that time, I´ve seen a lot of resumes. And, since I´ve been with several associations, I´ve also sent out more than a few. I´ve developed some strong opinions about resumes, but if you know me, you know I´ve developed strong opinions about damn near everything.
I think it´s safe to say now has to be the toughest time for job seekers since I applied to and was accepted by the United States Marines in 1964. If I´d had a resume then it might have said, "Cocky, bright, good work ethic, will go to any hell hole you say and get my hands dirty to get the job done." It probably still should.
If you´re applying for jobs in today´s economy, especially if you are "between situations" (as I was for half of 2007), you want your resume to be perfect.
Bad news: there is no such thing as perfect. Resumes not only come in many styles and formats, but they are a lot like websites—very subjective. You can spend a barrel of money having an expert design either one, and the next five "experts" who look at it will say it´s terrible, and needs a makeover. (Usually by them for even more money.)
So my first tip is to get the resume you are comfortable with. Don´t let a resume writer fill it with puffed-up clichés, which have little meaning, and don´t sound like you. I´ve interviewed people who I could tell had someone else write their resumes, once I talked to them. I never found out if they´d have been good employees.
While you should remember that free advice is worth the price, here are some other thoughts that might help you make your resume a keeper:
Review colleagues´ resumes: Read every resume you can from colleagues in your field, especially from those who have landed jobs. Skip the guy who´s been looking since the Harding Administration. There are often things you can borrow, phrases you can uses, and ways of presenting things that are new.
Objective: I don´t believe in putting an "objective" on a resume. Your objective goes in your well-crafted, one-page cover letter. It is to secure this particular position, for which you are the perfect fit, because of the following highlights from your resume. A resume "objective" is either so broad as to be meaningless, has obviously been tailored to the particular opening, or is limiting. I´ve often received resumes where the objective had nothing to do with the position I was trying to fill. Like finding typos, that made it easy to pop them in the "no" pile.
Profile/Summary of Qualifications/Skills: I´ve never used one. I can see the value to catch the attention of a reviewer who has a large pile of resumes on the desk. But so many of those I´ve read are heavy on the clichés. Aren´t you turned off when a salesperson oversells you? If you do start your resume this way, I think under-stated and straight-forward will make a better impression, e.g., "Association Executive with successful record in membership development, fiscal management, board relations and….."
Clichés and jargon: "Seasoned Professional." (Garlic? Hot peppers?) "Change Agent." (So were Hitler and Stalin.) "High Impact." (When dropped from a plane.) "Hit the Ground Running." (He´ll never get any better than day one.). I find resumes as full of words that sound good and mean little as a Chicago Politician. And if one more candidate tells me she/he "is a people person," he/she will make a "High Impact." You are turned off by clichés; don´t you think the hiring authority is as well?
Jargon is also likely to turn off the reader. I often help transitioning Marines with their resumes. Usually their first draft is terrific—if they were applying to be a senior Marine leader. I help them speak civilian.
Don´t get fancy: Resumes with graphics look childish to me. Resumes with pictures make me wonder why they think that matters. Fancy paper suggests to me it is needed to titivate the content—I´ve done just fine on white copy paper, thank you. (Chances are the headhunter—excuse me, Search Consultant—will put it on copy paper to distribute to the board anyway.) Skip the color rainbow. And two fonts are the maximum: a nice, common sans serif like Ariel for heads and a serif like Times New Roman for body text. You may be tempted by gimmicks in this economy, but they make you look desperate and unprofessional.
Action Verbs: "Responsible for the budget" is weak. I always want to ask, "Yeah, but did you do any of the things you were responsible for?" Words like managed, implemented, supervised, planned, presented, increased and developed are action verbs. They say that you did something.
Be specific: "Responsible for membership development" versus "Increased membership by 42.3% over three-year period." Which candidate would you interview? And remember the accountant´s rule for expense reports: $15 for lunch looks made up, while $16.43 looks exact, so don´t round off numbers.
Take appropriate credit: If during your tenure Executive Director the membership, the reserves and conference attendance all increased, claim it. They will know it was a team effort, but it was your responsibility on your watch. You´d get the blame if they went the other way! On the other hand, if you were the Director of Membership, taking credit for the conference might be a stretch. The "Incredible Hulk" has a career, the "Incredible Association Executive" doesn´t.
Length: I like the old rule. One page for under ten years experience, two for 10 to 20, and three pages for longer careers. But unless you´re an academic, thus expected to list every conference and publication, never longer than three. This depends on your circumstances, of course, but a three-page resume for a twenty-year-old looks pretty puffed. I do believe in including additional information with my resume and cover letter, usually a list of references (I like to list several), and a list of my published association management articles, sometimes with an appropriate writing sample. (But not the poetry, fiction or opinion columns I´ve also published.)
Affiliations and credentials: Again, list what is relevant to the position. I list ASAE, the Association Forum and the Marine Executive Association, but not the many veterans, Scottish and other organizations I belong to. I put CAE behind my name, but not FSA Scot. (Extra credit if you figure that one out!) Claiming credentials (or experience) you don´t have, or from degree mills, is, of course, unethical and stupid. But I understand it´s widely done. If that´s your style, I can credential you as a fellow FSR* for only fifty bucks.
Personal information: Generally skip revealing that your hobby is knitting or that you love to garden (unless, of course, you are applying to a gardening or knitting organization!). I do include personal information I think is relevant. Last time I was job hunting, I reported "No missed days for illness in five years," but I´m at an age where age discrimination is a possibility and wanted them to know I show up for work. I´d also list things like "free to travel" and/or "willing to relocate" if true and you think they may be relevant to the employer.
Leaving out information: Always a tough call. I leave out one association job, because I was there only long enough to find A. I´d been lied to, B. The reserves didn´t exist, C. The leadership wasn´t committed enough to change and D. A new job. I figure all I learned there was to do better due diligence, it was a while back, and it doesn´t leave an obvious gap. But I reveal it if asked. Once you lie, you´re sunk.
Order: The rule used to be that your education was listed first. I think my experience is more relevant, so I list it ahead of my education. But if neither is impressive, then you have my permission to use graphics, colors, clichés, ten fonts and fancy paper. Who knows—it might work.
Good luck. Remember that persistence counts. Write if you get work.
Robert A. Hall, MEd, CAE, FSA Scot, FSR is Executive Director of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons in Rosemont, IL, and the author of Chaos for Breakfast, published by ASAE.
Full Service Rogue.
I think it´s safe to say now has to be the toughest time for job seekers since I applied to and was accepted by the United States Marines in 1964. If I´d had a resume then it might have said, "Cocky, bright, good work ethic, will go to any hell hole you say and get my hands dirty to get the job done." It probably still should.
If you´re applying for jobs in today´s economy, especially if you are "between situations" (as I was for half of 2007), you want your resume to be perfect.
Bad news: there is no such thing as perfect. Resumes not only come in many styles and formats, but they are a lot like websites—very subjective. You can spend a barrel of money having an expert design either one, and the next five "experts" who look at it will say it´s terrible, and needs a makeover. (Usually by them for even more money.)
So my first tip is to get the resume you are comfortable with. Don´t let a resume writer fill it with puffed-up clichés, which have little meaning, and don´t sound like you. I´ve interviewed people who I could tell had someone else write their resumes, once I talked to them. I never found out if they´d have been good employees.
While you should remember that free advice is worth the price, here are some other thoughts that might help you make your resume a keeper:
Review colleagues´ resumes: Read every resume you can from colleagues in your field, especially from those who have landed jobs. Skip the guy who´s been looking since the Harding Administration. There are often things you can borrow, phrases you can uses, and ways of presenting things that are new.
Objective: I don´t believe in putting an "objective" on a resume. Your objective goes in your well-crafted, one-page cover letter. It is to secure this particular position, for which you are the perfect fit, because of the following highlights from your resume. A resume "objective" is either so broad as to be meaningless, has obviously been tailored to the particular opening, or is limiting. I´ve often received resumes where the objective had nothing to do with the position I was trying to fill. Like finding typos, that made it easy to pop them in the "no" pile.
Profile/Summary of Qualifications/Skills: I´ve never used one. I can see the value to catch the attention of a reviewer who has a large pile of resumes on the desk. But so many of those I´ve read are heavy on the clichés. Aren´t you turned off when a salesperson oversells you? If you do start your resume this way, I think under-stated and straight-forward will make a better impression, e.g., "Association Executive with successful record in membership development, fiscal management, board relations and….."
Clichés and jargon: "Seasoned Professional." (Garlic? Hot peppers?) "Change Agent." (So were Hitler and Stalin.) "High Impact." (When dropped from a plane.) "Hit the Ground Running." (He´ll never get any better than day one.). I find resumes as full of words that sound good and mean little as a Chicago Politician. And if one more candidate tells me she/he "is a people person," he/she will make a "High Impact." You are turned off by clichés; don´t you think the hiring authority is as well?
Jargon is also likely to turn off the reader. I often help transitioning Marines with their resumes. Usually their first draft is terrific—if they were applying to be a senior Marine leader. I help them speak civilian.
Don´t get fancy: Resumes with graphics look childish to me. Resumes with pictures make me wonder why they think that matters. Fancy paper suggests to me it is needed to titivate the content—I´ve done just fine on white copy paper, thank you. (Chances are the headhunter—excuse me, Search Consultant—will put it on copy paper to distribute to the board anyway.) Skip the color rainbow. And two fonts are the maximum: a nice, common sans serif like Ariel for heads and a serif like Times New Roman for body text. You may be tempted by gimmicks in this economy, but they make you look desperate and unprofessional.
Action Verbs: "Responsible for the budget" is weak. I always want to ask, "Yeah, but did you do any of the things you were responsible for?" Words like managed, implemented, supervised, planned, presented, increased and developed are action verbs. They say that you did something.
Be specific: "Responsible for membership development" versus "Increased membership by 42.3% over three-year period." Which candidate would you interview? And remember the accountant´s rule for expense reports: $15 for lunch looks made up, while $16.43 looks exact, so don´t round off numbers.
Take appropriate credit: If during your tenure Executive Director the membership, the reserves and conference attendance all increased, claim it. They will know it was a team effort, but it was your responsibility on your watch. You´d get the blame if they went the other way! On the other hand, if you were the Director of Membership, taking credit for the conference might be a stretch. The "Incredible Hulk" has a career, the "Incredible Association Executive" doesn´t.
Length: I like the old rule. One page for under ten years experience, two for 10 to 20, and three pages for longer careers. But unless you´re an academic, thus expected to list every conference and publication, never longer than three. This depends on your circumstances, of course, but a three-page resume for a twenty-year-old looks pretty puffed. I do believe in including additional information with my resume and cover letter, usually a list of references (I like to list several), and a list of my published association management articles, sometimes with an appropriate writing sample. (But not the poetry, fiction or opinion columns I´ve also published.)
Affiliations and credentials: Again, list what is relevant to the position. I list ASAE, the Association Forum and the Marine Executive Association, but not the many veterans, Scottish and other organizations I belong to. I put CAE behind my name, but not FSA Scot. (Extra credit if you figure that one out!) Claiming credentials (or experience) you don´t have, or from degree mills, is, of course, unethical and stupid. But I understand it´s widely done. If that´s your style, I can credential you as a fellow FSR* for only fifty bucks.
Personal information: Generally skip revealing that your hobby is knitting or that you love to garden (unless, of course, you are applying to a gardening or knitting organization!). I do include personal information I think is relevant. Last time I was job hunting, I reported "No missed days for illness in five years," but I´m at an age where age discrimination is a possibility and wanted them to know I show up for work. I´d also list things like "free to travel" and/or "willing to relocate" if true and you think they may be relevant to the employer.
Leaving out information: Always a tough call. I leave out one association job, because I was there only long enough to find A. I´d been lied to, B. The reserves didn´t exist, C. The leadership wasn´t committed enough to change and D. A new job. I figure all I learned there was to do better due diligence, it was a while back, and it doesn´t leave an obvious gap. But I reveal it if asked. Once you lie, you´re sunk.
Order: The rule used to be that your education was listed first. I think my experience is more relevant, so I list it ahead of my education. But if neither is impressive, then you have my permission to use graphics, colors, clichés, ten fonts and fancy paper. Who knows—it might work.
Good luck. Remember that persistence counts. Write if you get work.
Robert A. Hall, MEd, CAE, FSA Scot, FSR is Executive Director of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons in Rosemont, IL, and the author of Chaos for Breakfast, published by ASAE.
Full Service Rogue.
Print
Email
