The Irreconcilable Faces & Philosophies of President Bush
C. H. McMillan
April 01, 2006
Since the Dubai port debacle we have had a steady diet of personal appearances by the president as he tries to reconnect with an electorate that is markedly dissatisfied with his performance. To that end he has been very generous with taking unstructured questions from the audience and as the result has been forced to give unrehearsed answers. It is in the dichotomy between his foreign policy justifications and his domestic policy performance that the inconsistencies of his philosophies and his values become evident and subject to question of their righteousness.
Wednesday, before his departure for Mexico, the president held a ?Freedom House? event; follows, one paragraph quoted from his speech:
Bush @ Freedom House address 3/29/06
There are, however, essential principles common to every successful society, in every culture. Successful societies limit the power of the state and the power of the military -- so that governments respond to the will of the people, and not the will of an elite. Successful societies protect freedom with the consistent and impartial rule of law, instead of selecting applying -- selectively applying the law to punish political opponents. Successful societies allow room for healthy civic institutions -- for political parties and labor unions and independent newspapers and broadcast media. Successful societies guarantee religious liberty -- the right to serve and honor God without fear of persecution. Successful societies privatize their economies, and secure the rights of property. They prohibit and punish official corruption, and invest in the health and education of their people. They recognize the rights of women. And instead of directing hatred and resentment against others, successful societies appeal to the hopes of their own people.? (Applause.)
All those are very lofty and laudable social and political goals but with Bush 43 they only apply in his driven ?mission & personal vision? to ?out-force? democracy ? to the third world. He has failed or not attempted to apply the same laudable objectives domestically.
Let?s compare these quoted goals for international achievement with his domestic record.
Everything Bush has done as president as been focused on increasing the power of the federal government.
Nothing in the Bush presidency is reflective of the desire of most citizens? for a much smaller less intrusive government.
Bush's administration has been all about the creation of an elitist vision of US governmental structure.
Centralized control of the US is required to implement elitist?s strategy of worldwide regulation of labor, trade and currency.
The Balkanization of the United States is a key component of this movement. The Holy Grail of globalists (and Communists) is to topple the independence that has made the US different and supremely successful as a political structure. They are accomplishing this through the incremental planned disintegration of our identity as a nation, from within, leading to the establishment of an oligarchy. The promise of racial discord attendant to uncontrolled immigration of conflicting cultures; the reduction in standard of living inherent in open trade and unskilled worker competition is being further fueled by the planned collapse of the currency (witness the accumulation of 8 trillion dollars of national debt and a disastrous annual balance of trade ? one blip in the economy and $ are confetti). The end result is to be the enslavement of the masses. Fear in the population from the escalating impact of the fore goings tendency to create anarchy will create acceptance in the people to welcome Martial Law, which is already in place in the components of the Patriot Act, but as yet undeclared.
Consistent application of the rule of law
Give Me a Break!!!!
Not toward immigration.
Not only has he turned a blind eye and a deaf ear to citizen voters but also to his constitutional obligation to protect the borders and control immigration. Moreover he?s responsible for exacerbating the problem through the early years of his administration and until very recently, by actively promoting and articulating policies that were an open invitation to illegal migrants from Mexico. The end result has been that the illegal alien population in the United States has more than doubled during his tenure in office.
If one accepts that out of control immigration, legal and illegal, are national crisis, a political hot potato for the Republican Party, and a looming social and economic disaster for wage earning American citizens, then how can the president sit in the bleachers and fail to exercise ANY of the lawful authorities congress has delegated him to control the problem? Answer: It?s in ?the Plan?.
To further ?the plan?, he (the Prez.) boogies down to Mexico on the day debate begins on immigration in the U.S. Senate ? to get Vincente Fox to back off his long advocated ?reconquesta? and open borders position ? not to take the heat off Republican Senators, but to distance himself from the conflagration and appear conciliatory to American citizens who want no part of another 40 to 60 thousand Mexicans admitted to our country.
When Fox and Bush both back off of their aggressive stands advocating northward migration and colonization for the first part, and welcoming Third World workers from the other, you better believe that ?The Fix Is In? and the Senate is to be the scapegoat! If this huge immigration amnesty goes through, Neo-con Republican globalists won't really care if they retain control of the Congress or not because they will have irreversibly put in place the last of the key pieces for the fragmentation of the Republic (?the Plan?).
Absent ?the Plan? what any President of the United States would have been doing down in Mexico last week was delivering a declaration of war to the guy (Vincente) as national enemy #1 for strategizing, organizing and facilitating the invasion of the U.S.A. and the ongoing demonstrations; cutting all diplomatic ties, recalling ambassadors, curtailing foreign aid and rescinding the NAFTA trade agreement. However, as a man of his word (and a lackey of the Globalists), Bushie can?t do those things (required by his oath of office). The reality is that he has long had a tacit agreement w/ Vincente (probably inherited from his father ? B41) and other ?WORLDISM? advocates, to eliminate national borders in the furtherance of the ?new world order?
The public is furious with his vision and philosophies on war as a vehicle to ?out-force? democracy, and domestically his refusal to secure the nations borders and ports ? to keep us secure in the confines of our Republic. We universally hate mortgaging future generations. We feel we are not heard, though we know he isn?t that dense, so we conclude that we are being ignored. Resentment and frustration build in mass numbers of the legal population. Every week ? if not daily, he does something bumblingly stupid to frustrate domestic optimism and shatter hope - ?successful societies appeal to the hopes of their own people.?
It?s because of Bush?s image as a ?good ol? boy, stumbling over words, look you in the eye, sincere, take my word on it, just one of you, red-neck Texan hick persona, that people continue to cut him slack. He pulls it off and that is why he is a useful tool in implementing ?the Plan?. He, hopefully, isn?t inherently evil but ?the Plan? is.
To avoid or postpone consigning their children to poverty and conflict, American?s must frustrate the Amnesty Immigration piece; stop it dead in its tracks ? NOW, in the US Senate, this week.
Storm their local offices ? ring their phones and faxes into the midnight hours, hold candle light vigils in front of their family and relatives home and/or business.
Make them realize that they are on a VERY SHORT leash of passing an ?enforcement only? counterpart to H.B. 4437.
C. H. McMillan
Wednesday, before his departure for Mexico, the president held a ?Freedom House? event; follows, one paragraph quoted from his speech:
Bush @ Freedom House address 3/29/06
There are, however, essential principles common to every successful society, in every culture. Successful societies limit the power of the state and the power of the military -- so that governments respond to the will of the people, and not the will of an elite. Successful societies protect freedom with the consistent and impartial rule of law, instead of selecting applying -- selectively applying the law to punish political opponents. Successful societies allow room for healthy civic institutions -- for political parties and labor unions and independent newspapers and broadcast media. Successful societies guarantee religious liberty -- the right to serve and honor God without fear of persecution. Successful societies privatize their economies, and secure the rights of property. They prohibit and punish official corruption, and invest in the health and education of their people. They recognize the rights of women. And instead of directing hatred and resentment against others, successful societies appeal to the hopes of their own people.? (Applause.)
All those are very lofty and laudable social and political goals but with Bush 43 they only apply in his driven ?mission & personal vision? to ?out-force? democracy ? to the third world. He has failed or not attempted to apply the same laudable objectives domestically.
Let?s compare these quoted goals for international achievement with his domestic record.
Everything Bush has done as president as been focused on increasing the power of the federal government.
Nothing in the Bush presidency is reflective of the desire of most citizens? for a much smaller less intrusive government.
Bush's administration has been all about the creation of an elitist vision of US governmental structure.
Centralized control of the US is required to implement elitist?s strategy of worldwide regulation of labor, trade and currency.
The Balkanization of the United States is a key component of this movement. The Holy Grail of globalists (and Communists) is to topple the independence that has made the US different and supremely successful as a political structure. They are accomplishing this through the incremental planned disintegration of our identity as a nation, from within, leading to the establishment of an oligarchy. The promise of racial discord attendant to uncontrolled immigration of conflicting cultures; the reduction in standard of living inherent in open trade and unskilled worker competition is being further fueled by the planned collapse of the currency (witness the accumulation of 8 trillion dollars of national debt and a disastrous annual balance of trade ? one blip in the economy and $ are confetti). The end result is to be the enslavement of the masses. Fear in the population from the escalating impact of the fore goings tendency to create anarchy will create acceptance in the people to welcome Martial Law, which is already in place in the components of the Patriot Act, but as yet undeclared.
Consistent application of the rule of law
Give Me a Break!!!!
Not toward immigration.
Not only has he turned a blind eye and a deaf ear to citizen voters but also to his constitutional obligation to protect the borders and control immigration. Moreover he?s responsible for exacerbating the problem through the early years of his administration and until very recently, by actively promoting and articulating policies that were an open invitation to illegal migrants from Mexico. The end result has been that the illegal alien population in the United States has more than doubled during his tenure in office.
If one accepts that out of control immigration, legal and illegal, are national crisis, a political hot potato for the Republican Party, and a looming social and economic disaster for wage earning American citizens, then how can the president sit in the bleachers and fail to exercise ANY of the lawful authorities congress has delegated him to control the problem? Answer: It?s in ?the Plan?.
To further ?the plan?, he (the Prez.) boogies down to Mexico on the day debate begins on immigration in the U.S. Senate ? to get Vincente Fox to back off his long advocated ?reconquesta? and open borders position ? not to take the heat off Republican Senators, but to distance himself from the conflagration and appear conciliatory to American citizens who want no part of another 40 to 60 thousand Mexicans admitted to our country.
When Fox and Bush both back off of their aggressive stands advocating northward migration and colonization for the first part, and welcoming Third World workers from the other, you better believe that ?The Fix Is In? and the Senate is to be the scapegoat! If this huge immigration amnesty goes through, Neo-con Republican globalists won't really care if they retain control of the Congress or not because they will have irreversibly put in place the last of the key pieces for the fragmentation of the Republic (?the Plan?).
Absent ?the Plan? what any President of the United States would have been doing down in Mexico last week was delivering a declaration of war to the guy (Vincente) as national enemy #1 for strategizing, organizing and facilitating the invasion of the U.S.A. and the ongoing demonstrations; cutting all diplomatic ties, recalling ambassadors, curtailing foreign aid and rescinding the NAFTA trade agreement. However, as a man of his word (and a lackey of the Globalists), Bushie can?t do those things (required by his oath of office). The reality is that he has long had a tacit agreement w/ Vincente (probably inherited from his father ? B41) and other ?WORLDISM? advocates, to eliminate national borders in the furtherance of the ?new world order?
The public is furious with his vision and philosophies on war as a vehicle to ?out-force? democracy, and domestically his refusal to secure the nations borders and ports ? to keep us secure in the confines of our Republic. We universally hate mortgaging future generations. We feel we are not heard, though we know he isn?t that dense, so we conclude that we are being ignored. Resentment and frustration build in mass numbers of the legal population. Every week ? if not daily, he does something bumblingly stupid to frustrate domestic optimism and shatter hope - ?successful societies appeal to the hopes of their own people.?
It?s because of Bush?s image as a ?good ol? boy, stumbling over words, look you in the eye, sincere, take my word on it, just one of you, red-neck Texan hick persona, that people continue to cut him slack. He pulls it off and that is why he is a useful tool in implementing ?the Plan?. He, hopefully, isn?t inherently evil but ?the Plan? is.
To avoid or postpone consigning their children to poverty and conflict, American?s must frustrate the Amnesty Immigration piece; stop it dead in its tracks ? NOW, in the US Senate, this week.
Storm their local offices ? ring their phones and faxes into the midnight hours, hold candle light vigils in front of their family and relatives home and/or business.
Make them realize that they are on a VERY SHORT leash of passing an ?enforcement only? counterpart to H.B. 4437.
C. H. McMillan
Print
Email
