Jermaine Jackson: Michael Jackson Has A Thing For Kids
Robert Paul Reyes
March 06, 2006
"Michael Jackson has a thing for young children"
Jermaine Jackson (As reported by "All Headline News" staff writer Felicia Willis.
No kidding! That's like saying Oprah Winfrey has a thing for donuts, Snoop Dogg has a thing for weed, Anna Nicole Smith has a thing for pharmaceuticals, Mike Tyson has a thing for chewing ears or Donald Trump has a thing for money.
This quote is from the outline of a tell-all book Jermaine was planning to write about Michael Jackson and the rest of the Jackson clan.
If I remember correctly, during Jacko's trial for child molestation, Jermaine was loudly and unequivocally proclaiming Michael's innocence.
But Jermaine knows that unless he finally told the truth about his wayward brother, no publisher would be interested in his book proposal.
A jury found Jacko not guilty of the charges last June, but let's not forget that O. J. Simpson and Robert Blake were also found not guilty.
In a court of law Michael Jackson was found "not guilty", but I'm not in a court of law and I am free to express my opinion that he is "guilty as sin".
In our judicial system "not guilty" is not synonymous with "innocent". In my opinion, Jacko was able to get away with child molestation because fame trumps common sense and justice.
Jermaine changed his mind about publishing his expose when Michael Jackson threw a hissy fit and threatened him with a law suit.
Michael Jackson has a thing for young children, but unless he is tried by a jury of octogenarians who don't give a hoot about pop culture, he will continue to get away with his scandalous behavior.
Jermaine Jackson (As reported by "All Headline News" staff writer Felicia Willis.
No kidding! That's like saying Oprah Winfrey has a thing for donuts, Snoop Dogg has a thing for weed, Anna Nicole Smith has a thing for pharmaceuticals, Mike Tyson has a thing for chewing ears or Donald Trump has a thing for money.
This quote is from the outline of a tell-all book Jermaine was planning to write about Michael Jackson and the rest of the Jackson clan.
If I remember correctly, during Jacko's trial for child molestation, Jermaine was loudly and unequivocally proclaiming Michael's innocence.
But Jermaine knows that unless he finally told the truth about his wayward brother, no publisher would be interested in his book proposal.
A jury found Jacko not guilty of the charges last June, but let's not forget that O. J. Simpson and Robert Blake were also found not guilty.
In a court of law Michael Jackson was found "not guilty", but I'm not in a court of law and I am free to express my opinion that he is "guilty as sin".
In our judicial system "not guilty" is not synonymous with "innocent". In my opinion, Jacko was able to get away with child molestation because fame trumps common sense and justice.
Jermaine changed his mind about publishing his expose when Michael Jackson threw a hissy fit and threatened him with a law suit.
Michael Jackson has a thing for young children, but unless he is tried by a jury of octogenarians who don't give a hoot about pop culture, he will continue to get away with his scandalous behavior.
Print
Email
