Eight States and 400+ Municipalities resolve to err on the side of the U. S. Constitution
Each of these states has advised their Senators and Representatives to work to eliminate those areas of conflict from the Patriot Act. Several Senators have chosen, at least up until now, to disregard that advice.
Over 400 municipalities have passed resolutions which proclaim serious concern that the Patriot Act denies individual rights and civil liberties, and urge law enforcement agencies to evaluate requests for information or action with regard to constitutional guarantees.
Senator Feingold has been trying for several weeks to introduce amendments to the Patriot Act which would bring the offending sections of the Patriot Act in line with the U.S. Constitution. Through procedural maneuvering, Senator Frist, Senate Majority Leader, has prevented Senator Feingold’s amendments from reaching the floor for a vote. This action has denied a voice not only to Senator Feingold, but to his entire Wisconsin constituency. Clearly, this is not in keeping with the intent of our Constitution in terms of how the Senate is to create law.
Yesterday, Senator Feingold read aloud the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, followed by all eight of the state resolutions and four of the more than 400 resolutions of municipalities. The question must be asked why these resolutions have not been front page news since the day they were passed. Even more important, why haven’t they been a major talking pont in open discussions in Congress and in the media?
Clearly, a large portion of American society finds many of the provisions in the Patriot Act quite un-American.
A final Senate vote is scheduled for 3pm EST today, March 2,to accept or refuse the Joint Resolution of the House and Senate which now includes a few changes which even Senator Arlen Specter, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, calls “cosmetic.”
How are the Senators from Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Maine, Montana and Vermont going to vote? Will these Senators follow the clearly spoken will of their constituents, or will they advance under marching orders from the White House?
Do we have a government of, by and for the people? Is the Senate part of a Check and Balance, or is the Senate a Rubber Stamp? Don’t take my word for anything. Tune in to C-Span2 this afternoon and find out for yourself.