Reverse Teachnology Motor: Scientists don`t know what they are measuring+ its effects on DNA
Carol J. R. Rae
February 23, 2008
Technology works on a reverse polarity system it might be thought at low frequency, turly its off scale.. Its more to do with a force field and particle effect and light Technology works on a reverse technology motor it generate every thing from light to low frequency it effects our DNA
Its a free for all:
If one tells them energies not being measured in the right place: They don`t wish to hear, carrying right on where they left off.
Einstein knew, so called new technology runs on a "Reverse Technology Motor" either solid state or moving as
(Sometimes known a stealth technology or even Tesla)in a rotaing or vibration magnet.
Low frequency, Nanoparticle, chemical sensitivity, electrosensitivty and DNA. Its been lost to main stream science that its possible to create any chemical electrical by generating the sine wave of that chemical ..
The Military knew this in the 1950`s with the use heads-up-displays for pilots.Psychologists, some scientists have found ways of analysing the bacterial content without incubating the substrate..Chemistry department Cambridge university a few year back only local BBC News: I tired to contact them.Warn them that they could be carrying that information for the infection on themselves.The Pharmaceutical industry have been creating products in the same way..Likewise the military can make non-lethal weapon systems.Then broadcast it over any distance.
Its all being broadcast over networks.
Combining with forms of microwave/nuclear generation devices:
Further reading
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/538388503?ts=1062972829&sign[partner_userID
http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/7322/index.php
I had this extract sent to me:by
Paul Raymond Doyon
Lecturer EFL JFL, Yunnan Normal University
MAT , MA , BA
"I don't use a cell phone for the same reason I don't put a gun to my - or anyone else's - head and pull the trigger."
EMFs and DNA Effects Potential Mechanism Elucidated
http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2004/112-6/ss.html
For many years, scientists have suspected that long-term exposure to extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) may be associated with increased risk of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Some studies have shown that EMF exposure can damage DNA in a variety of human and animal cells, while others have shown no significant effect. Now Henry Lai and Narendra P. Singh of the University of Washington offer support for speculation that environmental exposure to EMFs is hazardous and that the effects may be cumulative [EHP 112:687-694]. They also offer a potential cellular mechanism for cell damage associated with EMF exposure that may help explain anomalies reported earlier in the literature.
Not just hot air. Environmentally relevant levels of EMF exposure, such as those encountered near hair dryers, may cause DNA damage through a two-part mechanism.
image credit: Corel
Lai and Singh's findings support the so-called free radical hypothesis, which posits that extremely-low-frequency EMFs increase free radical activity in cells, thereby causing DNA damage and disturbing other cellular processes and functions. They and others had shown earlier that free radical damage can lead to cellular necrosis and apoptosis. Such effects are particularly troubling in neurons, because these cells cannot divide and are not replaced when they die--thus the potential link to neurodegenerative diseases.
Lai and Singh exposed groups of rats for 24 or 48 hours to a 60-hertz magnetic field at an intensity of 0.01 millitesla (mT)--a low intensity within the levels that a person could encounter in the environment, for example near electric blankets and hair dryers. They treated some of the groups with one of three drugs, two that are known to decrease cellular free radicals and a third, an iron chelator, that has been implicated in the generation of free radicals.
They found significantly more DNA single- and double-strand breaks in the brain cells of undosed rats that were exposed longer, indicating that the effects were cumulative. In previous research, they had exposed rats to a 0.1-mT field for 2 hours with no detectable increase in DNA double-strand breaks. This suggests a complicated interaction between intensity and duration of exposure in the biologic effects of EMFs, and could explain negative results in other studies.
Among the dosed rats, all three drugs protected against EMF-induced DNA damage. The team therefore proposes that EMF-induced effects arise through a two-stage process. Exposure first upsets iron homeostasis in certain cells, releasing free iron into the cytoplasm and nucleus. This leads to the generation of hydroxy radicals that damage DNA, lipids, and proteins. Lipid damage in the cellular membrane then leads to calcium leakage from internal sites in the cell, triggering the second step: an increase in the synthesis of the free radical nitric oxide. Nitric oxide can also cause more iron-mediated free radicals to be generated.
At that point, say Lai and Singh, if antioxidation processes fail, the cell will undergo necrosis or apoptosis. Thus, the outcome depends on the interaction of a variety of factors, including the preexisting oxidative status of the cell and the parameters of the exposure. The pair speculate that, considering the role iron seems to play in the process, iron-rich human brain tissues such as glial cells, neurons, and myelin may be more susceptible to EMF-induced damage.
Its a free for all:
If one tells them energies not being measured in the right place: They don`t wish to hear, carrying right on where they left off.
Einstein knew, so called new technology runs on a "Reverse Technology Motor" either solid state or moving as
(Sometimes known a stealth technology or even Tesla)in a rotaing or vibration magnet.
Low frequency, Nanoparticle, chemical sensitivity, electrosensitivty and DNA. Its been lost to main stream science that its possible to create any chemical electrical by generating the sine wave of that chemical ..
The Military knew this in the 1950`s with the use heads-up-displays for pilots.Psychologists, some scientists have found ways of analysing the bacterial content without incubating the substrate..Chemistry department Cambridge university a few year back only local BBC News: I tired to contact them.Warn them that they could be carrying that information for the infection on themselves.The Pharmaceutical industry have been creating products in the same way..Likewise the military can make non-lethal weapon systems.Then broadcast it over any distance.
Its all being broadcast over networks.
Combining with forms of microwave/nuclear generation devices:
Further reading
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/538388503?ts=1062972829&sign[partner_userID
http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/7322/index.php
I had this extract sent to me:by
Paul Raymond Doyon
Lecturer EFL JFL, Yunnan Normal University
MAT , MA , BA
"I don't use a cell phone for the same reason I don't put a gun to my - or anyone else's - head and pull the trigger."
EMFs and DNA Effects Potential Mechanism Elucidated
http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2004/112-6/ss.html
For many years, scientists have suspected that long-term exposure to extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) may be associated with increased risk of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Some studies have shown that EMF exposure can damage DNA in a variety of human and animal cells, while others have shown no significant effect. Now Henry Lai and Narendra P. Singh of the University of Washington offer support for speculation that environmental exposure to EMFs is hazardous and that the effects may be cumulative [EHP 112:687-694]. They also offer a potential cellular mechanism for cell damage associated with EMF exposure that may help explain anomalies reported earlier in the literature.
Not just hot air. Environmentally relevant levels of EMF exposure, such as those encountered near hair dryers, may cause DNA damage through a two-part mechanism.
image credit: Corel
Lai and Singh's findings support the so-called free radical hypothesis, which posits that extremely-low-frequency EMFs increase free radical activity in cells, thereby causing DNA damage and disturbing other cellular processes and functions. They and others had shown earlier that free radical damage can lead to cellular necrosis and apoptosis. Such effects are particularly troubling in neurons, because these cells cannot divide and are not replaced when they die--thus the potential link to neurodegenerative diseases.
Lai and Singh exposed groups of rats for 24 or 48 hours to a 60-hertz magnetic field at an intensity of 0.01 millitesla (mT)--a low intensity within the levels that a person could encounter in the environment, for example near electric blankets and hair dryers. They treated some of the groups with one of three drugs, two that are known to decrease cellular free radicals and a third, an iron chelator, that has been implicated in the generation of free radicals.
They found significantly more DNA single- and double-strand breaks in the brain cells of undosed rats that were exposed longer, indicating that the effects were cumulative. In previous research, they had exposed rats to a 0.1-mT field for 2 hours with no detectable increase in DNA double-strand breaks. This suggests a complicated interaction between intensity and duration of exposure in the biologic effects of EMFs, and could explain negative results in other studies.
Among the dosed rats, all three drugs protected against EMF-induced DNA damage. The team therefore proposes that EMF-induced effects arise through a two-stage process. Exposure first upsets iron homeostasis in certain cells, releasing free iron into the cytoplasm and nucleus. This leads to the generation of hydroxy radicals that damage DNA, lipids, and proteins. Lipid damage in the cellular membrane then leads to calcium leakage from internal sites in the cell, triggering the second step: an increase in the synthesis of the free radical nitric oxide. Nitric oxide can also cause more iron-mediated free radicals to be generated.
At that point, say Lai and Singh, if antioxidation processes fail, the cell will undergo necrosis or apoptosis. Thus, the outcome depends on the interaction of a variety of factors, including the preexisting oxidative status of the cell and the parameters of the exposure. The pair speculate that, considering the role iron seems to play in the process, iron-rich human brain tissues such as glial cells, neurons, and myelin may be more susceptible to EMF-induced damage.
Print
Email
