Turkey – Rejected by EU, Unwanted by US
Rauf Naqishbendi
November 16, 2007
The European Union’s tepid response to Turkey’s application for membership has deeply discomfited Turks. Turkey is without a doubt losing the esteem of the West, including the United States. Let us examine the aptitude of Turkey’s membership in the EU as well as a justification of the US’s dwindling relationship with Turkey.
The EU’s economic model is governed by the labor force’s adoption in the global market and industries’ flexibility to the changing market forces such as global trading, technological changes, aging populations, economic growth and fiscal discipline of its member countries. The only benefit Turks could have proffered the EU is its young labor force. But that contributing feature is overridden by two factors: the leading European players, Germany and France are suffering from double-digit unemployment, and the copious labor supply available from Eastern European countries which is by far more educated and skilful and would be easier to assimilate into the EU.
Turkey is much less developed and more populated than any major European member in the EU. During the eighties they built a sizable middle class which attracted the world’s attention. But one must look beneath the surface to find out that the prosperity came about through American foreign aid and US-sponsored guaranteed loans through the International Monetary Fund. Hence, it wasn’t representative of innovation or technological or industrial ingenuity, but rather of the leeching of American taxpayers. Here is a country with undisciplined fiscal policy, meager industrial capabilities, high inflation, and skyrocketing unemployment. Turkey has only liabilities to offer and therefore is decidedly not a country that the EU would be solicitous to include in their exclusive club.
The EU is unequivocally committed to honoring the universality and integrity of human rights – political, economic, social and cultural. More than any other issue, this covenant is by far the point of greatest difference between the EU and Turkey. To spotlight Turkey’s shabby democracy and their continual violation of human rights, consider the following:
Turkish leaders claim that Turkey is a civil society where they hold elections to choose the members of their parliament. It is true: there are a parliament and elections in Turkey. It is also true that one-third of Turkey’s population, the Kurds, is not represented. This is a clear violation of the democratic system which stipulates fair representation regardless of creed or ethnic background.
The identity of Kurds (again, one-third of Turkey’s population) has been denied, as the constitution conspicuously states that all citizens of Turkey are Turks.
In the 1980’s, the mayor of the largest Kurdish city, Dyarbaker, discoursed with his constituents in the Kurdish language. He was sentenced to jail for more than a decade for using the outlawed language. Abuses like these of the Kurds’ human rights have been ubiquitous since the inception of modern Turkey.
Since 1960 there have been three military coups d’etat and even today a right-wing military junta is ruling Turkey, not elected officials. In essence there is no democratic process in Turkey, while the upper echelon is military generals.
Turkey’s ruling party is the Justice and Development Party (AKP), which is deeply rooted in Sunni Islamic fundamentalism and who deceitfully disguise themselves as secular. This is a mockery of democracy for democracy cannot exist in a country ruled by a rigid Islamic fundamentalist party.
Turkey has embroiled itself in a war with Kurdish rebels (the PKK) who aim at equitable justice and freedom for the Kurdish minority. This armed conflict continues with no end in sight. Peace and stability is the environment where democracy can be nurtured; democracy cannot survive in a belligerent country.
The EU has tried hard to get Turkey to grant Kurds human rights, yet Turkey has persisted in the repression of Kurds. The recent Turkish threat of military intrusion into Iraqi Kurdistan evidences the fact that Turks are not interested in democracy and respect for human rights. The resolution of the Kurdish situation was one of the top issues put forward as a prerequisite for consideration of Turkey’s admission into the EU, yet Turks chose repression and violence instead of granting Kurds their human rights and resolving their differences with the Kurdish rebels through civilized dialogue.
Since the Iraqi Liberation Turks have been taunting Western, in particular American, values and policies. For example:
The level of American and anti-West sentiment in Turkey is one of the highest in the world. A recent Pew opinion poll showed that only 9 percent of Turks favor the United States while 28 percent look favorably on Iran.
Since the Iraqi Liberation anti-Semitic sentiments have been on the rise. Hitler’s Mien Kampf has been one of the bestselling books in Turkey. At the same time, the relations between Israel and Turkey have been weakened while Turkey’s relations with both Iran and Syria have been strengthened.
The anti-American sentiment in Turkey was recently reinforced with the release of a movie entitled “Valley of the Wolves” which portrays American soldiers as bloodthirsty fiends who are defeated by ragtag Turks in Iraqi Kurdistan.
Metal Storm, a recent bestselling work of fiction, portrays an all-out war between Turkey and America in 2007 in which Turkey, with the assistance of Russia and the EU, defeats the US.
The refusal of Turkey’s entry into the EU is merited. Turks don’t resemble Europeans, nor has Turkey been willing to adopt the democratic principles required by the EU. Turkey must realize its tyrannical rule prevents it from becoming part of the democratic European Union. However, Turks are attributing the European lack of enthusiasm for Turkey’s admission into the EU to being Moslem. That may be true, although in this case the EU is well justified not to recruit a member nation that is ruled by fundamentalist Sunni Moslems, one of the most antagonistic nations in the world toward Western values and traditions.
The EU’s economic model is governed by the labor force’s adoption in the global market and industries’ flexibility to the changing market forces such as global trading, technological changes, aging populations, economic growth and fiscal discipline of its member countries. The only benefit Turks could have proffered the EU is its young labor force. But that contributing feature is overridden by two factors: the leading European players, Germany and France are suffering from double-digit unemployment, and the copious labor supply available from Eastern European countries which is by far more educated and skilful and would be easier to assimilate into the EU.
Turkey is much less developed and more populated than any major European member in the EU. During the eighties they built a sizable middle class which attracted the world’s attention. But one must look beneath the surface to find out that the prosperity came about through American foreign aid and US-sponsored guaranteed loans through the International Monetary Fund. Hence, it wasn’t representative of innovation or technological or industrial ingenuity, but rather of the leeching of American taxpayers. Here is a country with undisciplined fiscal policy, meager industrial capabilities, high inflation, and skyrocketing unemployment. Turkey has only liabilities to offer and therefore is decidedly not a country that the EU would be solicitous to include in their exclusive club.
The EU is unequivocally committed to honoring the universality and integrity of human rights – political, economic, social and cultural. More than any other issue, this covenant is by far the point of greatest difference between the EU and Turkey. To spotlight Turkey’s shabby democracy and their continual violation of human rights, consider the following:
Turkish leaders claim that Turkey is a civil society where they hold elections to choose the members of their parliament. It is true: there are a parliament and elections in Turkey. It is also true that one-third of Turkey’s population, the Kurds, is not represented. This is a clear violation of the democratic system which stipulates fair representation regardless of creed or ethnic background.
The identity of Kurds (again, one-third of Turkey’s population) has been denied, as the constitution conspicuously states that all citizens of Turkey are Turks.
In the 1980’s, the mayor of the largest Kurdish city, Dyarbaker, discoursed with his constituents in the Kurdish language. He was sentenced to jail for more than a decade for using the outlawed language. Abuses like these of the Kurds’ human rights have been ubiquitous since the inception of modern Turkey.
Since 1960 there have been three military coups d’etat and even today a right-wing military junta is ruling Turkey, not elected officials. In essence there is no democratic process in Turkey, while the upper echelon is military generals.
Turkey’s ruling party is the Justice and Development Party (AKP), which is deeply rooted in Sunni Islamic fundamentalism and who deceitfully disguise themselves as secular. This is a mockery of democracy for democracy cannot exist in a country ruled by a rigid Islamic fundamentalist party.
Turkey has embroiled itself in a war with Kurdish rebels (the PKK) who aim at equitable justice and freedom for the Kurdish minority. This armed conflict continues with no end in sight. Peace and stability is the environment where democracy can be nurtured; democracy cannot survive in a belligerent country.
The EU has tried hard to get Turkey to grant Kurds human rights, yet Turkey has persisted in the repression of Kurds. The recent Turkish threat of military intrusion into Iraqi Kurdistan evidences the fact that Turks are not interested in democracy and respect for human rights. The resolution of the Kurdish situation was one of the top issues put forward as a prerequisite for consideration of Turkey’s admission into the EU, yet Turks chose repression and violence instead of granting Kurds their human rights and resolving their differences with the Kurdish rebels through civilized dialogue.
Since the Iraqi Liberation Turks have been taunting Western, in particular American, values and policies. For example:
The level of American and anti-West sentiment in Turkey is one of the highest in the world. A recent Pew opinion poll showed that only 9 percent of Turks favor the United States while 28 percent look favorably on Iran.
Since the Iraqi Liberation anti-Semitic sentiments have been on the rise. Hitler’s Mien Kampf has been one of the bestselling books in Turkey. At the same time, the relations between Israel and Turkey have been weakened while Turkey’s relations with both Iran and Syria have been strengthened.
The anti-American sentiment in Turkey was recently reinforced with the release of a movie entitled “Valley of the Wolves” which portrays American soldiers as bloodthirsty fiends who are defeated by ragtag Turks in Iraqi Kurdistan.
Metal Storm, a recent bestselling work of fiction, portrays an all-out war between Turkey and America in 2007 in which Turkey, with the assistance of Russia and the EU, defeats the US.
The refusal of Turkey’s entry into the EU is merited. Turks don’t resemble Europeans, nor has Turkey been willing to adopt the democratic principles required by the EU. Turkey must realize its tyrannical rule prevents it from becoming part of the democratic European Union. However, Turks are attributing the European lack of enthusiasm for Turkey’s admission into the EU to being Moslem. That may be true, although in this case the EU is well justified not to recruit a member nation that is ruled by fundamentalist Sunni Moslems, one of the most antagonistic nations in the world toward Western values and traditions.
Print
Email
