The Key to the Theory of Everything
Kazmer Ujvarosy
December 06, 2005
Once upon a time there was a discussion among the gods over where to hide the key to the Theory of Everything, so that their children would not find it, and use that secret knowledge for undesirable purposes. Many proposals were made, long discussions followed, but none of the ideas qualified.
Finally one of the gods said: Let's put the key inside our children; they will never think of looking for it there for a long time; by the time they are intelligent enough to discover the key to the Theory of Everything, hopefully they will also be wise enough to use that secret knowledge properly.
All the gods agreed, and so that is how the key to the Theory of Everything came to be hidden within us.
Now here is the key to the Theory of Everything: the human genome.
Now here is the Theory of Everything: the human genome constitutes the seed of the universe, or the cosmic system’s input and output, and created the universe for the production of human life in its own image, similarly as a seed creates a tree for the purpose of self-reproduction.
One of the reasons why we remained in the dark for so long is that upon high scientific authority we have been told repeatedly -- and it is taught in nearly all institutions of education, and is laid down in textbooks -- that (1) the concept of evolution from a simple beginning is scientific, but creation from the highest form of existence is not; that (2) evolution is a scientific theory because it is subject to scientific tests and refutation, but the various accounts of creation can neither be verified nor refuted through scientific investigation; that (3) no alternatives to evolution should be taught in our public schools because there are no scientific alternatives to evolution.
These convictions, widely accepted and deeply rooted as they are, simply do not tally with obvious facts.
First of all, the concept of evolution from a simple beginning makes no sense, scientific or otherwise. Let's face it: the delusion that a simple cause can generate an effect greater than is found in the cause is most irrational. The stark fact is that in reality no cause can give more than what it has. In other words, whatever is in the effect must be in the cause. This rule is called the Principle of Causality. It has never been falsified in any shape or form. By reason of its unfalsifiable nature this cause-and-effect relationship constitutes the foundation of rational science.
As the universe is the effect of a cause because it had a beginning, and as the universe indubitably yields the complexity of human life, the cause-and-effect relationship tells us that the cause of the universe and human life can be no lesser in complexity and qualities than the complexity and qualities we find in the universe.
Because it is self-evident that the highest form of existence has the potential to cause effects lesser than itself -- such as the universe and human life --, but nonlife or a simple beginning cannot cause effects superior to itself -- such as the universe and the complexity of life --, any scientific model that fails to derive the universe and human life from a source which is equal or superior to human life is unacceptable based on the cause-and-effect relationship. Those who believe that life is the product of the universe, when in fact the universe is the product of the existing highest form of life, are no different from that proverbial maker of an idol who supposed that the idol which he had made actually made him.
Second, contrary to what we are being told constantly in the name of science, the evolution of life’s complexity from a simple beginning is by no means a scientific theory: in reality there is no way to get something from nothing. Put simply, and as indicated above, if a simple beginning caused the complexity of life, where did the difference between the simple cause and the complex effect come from? The incredibly greater complexity, most clearly, could come only from nothing, which is contrary to reason. So there is no doubt that the richness and variety of life does not have its source in a simple beginning. Rather, it emerges sequentially from the seed of the universe, i.e. from the existing highest form of life.
Also let me note that there is no doubt that the evolutionists managed to get their hocus-pocus into the public school curriculum and poisoned the minds of millions of people. It is true that Darwin’s theory of common descent is a fact, but it is not from simpler common ancestors, but from a single and everlasting most complex common ancestor.
This brings us to the evolutionist delusion that no account of creation can be verified or refuted.
Testability allows us to put a theory to the test, and by proposing that human life or intelligence constitutes the everlasting seed of the universe, or the cosmic system's input and output, the theory is undeniably testable, and consequently scientific. After all human life most definitely exists, and nothing can be more available for observations and experiments.
Testing the theory's validity requires the exploration of the human genome's properties and potentials for the generation of cosmic structures, and the propulsion of space vehicles, among many other possibilities.
So the proposal that human life constitutes the cosmic system's tentative and tangible input and output remains scientifically valid. Only the discovery of an even more superior form of life can falsify that theory, or the demonstration that the Principle of Causality is invalid, namely that we can get something from nothing.
The Theory of Everything – i.e., the proposal that human life constitutes the seed or genotype of the phenotype universe – is not only testable, but predictive as well. Its predictions are too numerous to list, so we'll only predict human life’s eternity, and human life’s identity with the seed of the universe. Also we predict the following:
The elusive Higgs boson, dubbed the "God particle," is the same as the seed of the universe, and that mass-giving is life-giving because the elementary particles that come into contact with the cosmic seed's biofield receive their mass and property as a result of that interaction.
We predict that communication with the parent seed or intelligence that generated the universe is not only possible, but such exchange of information is taking place constantly in the form of prayer. From the systems point of view prayer qualifies as information feedback to the cosmic system's input on the part of its human output, which feedback ensures homeostasis.
We predict that the human yield of this planet is ripe for the harvest. This is indicated by the fact that we have reached the stage of space travel. Those desirable will be selected for survival, but not by Darwin’s imagined natural selection. Our creator in person is going to decide who is, or is not, fit to survive for ever. So face-to-face contact with our creator is at hand.
We predict that if our inference is correct that the cosmic common ancestor of the universe is a human being akin but superior to us, then the human genome’s qualities will be utilized for healing, industrial and other purposes that may be called "magical." In a short time seed power will make fossil fuels obsolete.
We predict that if the human genome is the seed of the universe, then ESPionage will make the traditional methods of intelligence gathering obsolete. We'll be able to read the minds of other persons, just as Elijah was able to tell the king of Israel the words that the king of Syria spoke in the privacy of his bedchamber, as the account in 2 Kings 6:8-23 indicates.
Finally, predictably only the desirable humans will be harvested by the cultivators of planet Earth, but those who are undesirable--namely those who tried to mislead mankind that we are the product of disorder etc.--will be eliminated, just as Elijah eliminated the prophets of Baal. (See 1 Kings 18:20-40) So don't tell me I did not warn you in time.
Our third point is, as by now it should be evident, that the claim by evolutionists that no alternatives to evolution should be taught in our public schools because there are no scientific alternatives to evolution is demonstrably false. Thus, just as the idea of evolution from simple common ancestors, this belief is another delusion. However if we turn Darwin's concept of evolution from a simple beginning upside down, and propose common descent from the most complex form of life that exists, we get a rational theory that makes human life the exclusive common ancestor of the universe.
To conclude, the observation of nature tells us that if we roll back the expansion of the universe in time, it is reducible not to an inanimate initial singularity, nor to a quantum blip, but rather to a single and most complex initial cosmic seed. If this Theory of Everything is correct, then we don't need the Big Bang, nor a theory of quantum gravity to describe the process of creation, because the universe does not have a Big Bang or quantum origin, but a seed origin. Thus there is no need to treat the universe as though it were the product of inanimate causes. Rather, we must treat it as a cosmic tree of life that unfolds from a single seed. The cosmic seed is postulated to be uncreated and immortal, because the universe has no power to act upon the initial seed of its own origin, just as a tree has no power to act upon the initial seed of its own origin.
We can rest assured that this Theory of Everything is not a new invention. The fact that human life constitutes the genotype of the phenotype universe, or the cosmic system's input and output, has been preached to us by many enlightened individuals. Christ is one of them. In Revelation 22-13 he disclosed the key to the origin of the universe: "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end." Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita is more straightforward. He told Prince Arjuna: "O Arjuna, I am the divine seed of all lives. In this world, nothing animate or inanimate exists without me."
Thus Krishna, just as Christ, tells us that human life is the procreative seed of the universe. Also in Islam the Prophet Mohammed is described as the seed of the universe.
Finally, Manly P. Hall made this observation in his monumental work, The Secret Teachings of All Ages: "A philosopher might declare that a universe could be made out of a man, but the foolish would regard this as an impossibility, not realizing that a man is a seed from which a universe may be brought forth."
Finally one of the gods said: Let's put the key inside our children; they will never think of looking for it there for a long time; by the time they are intelligent enough to discover the key to the Theory of Everything, hopefully they will also be wise enough to use that secret knowledge properly.
All the gods agreed, and so that is how the key to the Theory of Everything came to be hidden within us.
Now here is the key to the Theory of Everything: the human genome.
Now here is the Theory of Everything: the human genome constitutes the seed of the universe, or the cosmic system’s input and output, and created the universe for the production of human life in its own image, similarly as a seed creates a tree for the purpose of self-reproduction.
One of the reasons why we remained in the dark for so long is that upon high scientific authority we have been told repeatedly -- and it is taught in nearly all institutions of education, and is laid down in textbooks -- that (1) the concept of evolution from a simple beginning is scientific, but creation from the highest form of existence is not; that (2) evolution is a scientific theory because it is subject to scientific tests and refutation, but the various accounts of creation can neither be verified nor refuted through scientific investigation; that (3) no alternatives to evolution should be taught in our public schools because there are no scientific alternatives to evolution.
These convictions, widely accepted and deeply rooted as they are, simply do not tally with obvious facts.
First of all, the concept of evolution from a simple beginning makes no sense, scientific or otherwise. Let's face it: the delusion that a simple cause can generate an effect greater than is found in the cause is most irrational. The stark fact is that in reality no cause can give more than what it has. In other words, whatever is in the effect must be in the cause. This rule is called the Principle of Causality. It has never been falsified in any shape or form. By reason of its unfalsifiable nature this cause-and-effect relationship constitutes the foundation of rational science.
As the universe is the effect of a cause because it had a beginning, and as the universe indubitably yields the complexity of human life, the cause-and-effect relationship tells us that the cause of the universe and human life can be no lesser in complexity and qualities than the complexity and qualities we find in the universe.
Because it is self-evident that the highest form of existence has the potential to cause effects lesser than itself -- such as the universe and human life --, but nonlife or a simple beginning cannot cause effects superior to itself -- such as the universe and the complexity of life --, any scientific model that fails to derive the universe and human life from a source which is equal or superior to human life is unacceptable based on the cause-and-effect relationship. Those who believe that life is the product of the universe, when in fact the universe is the product of the existing highest form of life, are no different from that proverbial maker of an idol who supposed that the idol which he had made actually made him.
Second, contrary to what we are being told constantly in the name of science, the evolution of life’s complexity from a simple beginning is by no means a scientific theory: in reality there is no way to get something from nothing. Put simply, and as indicated above, if a simple beginning caused the complexity of life, where did the difference between the simple cause and the complex effect come from? The incredibly greater complexity, most clearly, could come only from nothing, which is contrary to reason. So there is no doubt that the richness and variety of life does not have its source in a simple beginning. Rather, it emerges sequentially from the seed of the universe, i.e. from the existing highest form of life.
Also let me note that there is no doubt that the evolutionists managed to get their hocus-pocus into the public school curriculum and poisoned the minds of millions of people. It is true that Darwin’s theory of common descent is a fact, but it is not from simpler common ancestors, but from a single and everlasting most complex common ancestor.
This brings us to the evolutionist delusion that no account of creation can be verified or refuted.
Testability allows us to put a theory to the test, and by proposing that human life or intelligence constitutes the everlasting seed of the universe, or the cosmic system's input and output, the theory is undeniably testable, and consequently scientific. After all human life most definitely exists, and nothing can be more available for observations and experiments.
Testing the theory's validity requires the exploration of the human genome's properties and potentials for the generation of cosmic structures, and the propulsion of space vehicles, among many other possibilities.
So the proposal that human life constitutes the cosmic system's tentative and tangible input and output remains scientifically valid. Only the discovery of an even more superior form of life can falsify that theory, or the demonstration that the Principle of Causality is invalid, namely that we can get something from nothing.
The Theory of Everything – i.e., the proposal that human life constitutes the seed or genotype of the phenotype universe – is not only testable, but predictive as well. Its predictions are too numerous to list, so we'll only predict human life’s eternity, and human life’s identity with the seed of the universe. Also we predict the following:
The elusive Higgs boson, dubbed the "God particle," is the same as the seed of the universe, and that mass-giving is life-giving because the elementary particles that come into contact with the cosmic seed's biofield receive their mass and property as a result of that interaction.
We predict that communication with the parent seed or intelligence that generated the universe is not only possible, but such exchange of information is taking place constantly in the form of prayer. From the systems point of view prayer qualifies as information feedback to the cosmic system's input on the part of its human output, which feedback ensures homeostasis.
We predict that the human yield of this planet is ripe for the harvest. This is indicated by the fact that we have reached the stage of space travel. Those desirable will be selected for survival, but not by Darwin’s imagined natural selection. Our creator in person is going to decide who is, or is not, fit to survive for ever. So face-to-face contact with our creator is at hand.
We predict that if our inference is correct that the cosmic common ancestor of the universe is a human being akin but superior to us, then the human genome’s qualities will be utilized for healing, industrial and other purposes that may be called "magical." In a short time seed power will make fossil fuels obsolete.
We predict that if the human genome is the seed of the universe, then ESPionage will make the traditional methods of intelligence gathering obsolete. We'll be able to read the minds of other persons, just as Elijah was able to tell the king of Israel the words that the king of Syria spoke in the privacy of his bedchamber, as the account in 2 Kings 6:8-23 indicates.
Finally, predictably only the desirable humans will be harvested by the cultivators of planet Earth, but those who are undesirable--namely those who tried to mislead mankind that we are the product of disorder etc.--will be eliminated, just as Elijah eliminated the prophets of Baal. (See 1 Kings 18:20-40) So don't tell me I did not warn you in time.
Our third point is, as by now it should be evident, that the claim by evolutionists that no alternatives to evolution should be taught in our public schools because there are no scientific alternatives to evolution is demonstrably false. Thus, just as the idea of evolution from simple common ancestors, this belief is another delusion. However if we turn Darwin's concept of evolution from a simple beginning upside down, and propose common descent from the most complex form of life that exists, we get a rational theory that makes human life the exclusive common ancestor of the universe.
To conclude, the observation of nature tells us that if we roll back the expansion of the universe in time, it is reducible not to an inanimate initial singularity, nor to a quantum blip, but rather to a single and most complex initial cosmic seed. If this Theory of Everything is correct, then we don't need the Big Bang, nor a theory of quantum gravity to describe the process of creation, because the universe does not have a Big Bang or quantum origin, but a seed origin. Thus there is no need to treat the universe as though it were the product of inanimate causes. Rather, we must treat it as a cosmic tree of life that unfolds from a single seed. The cosmic seed is postulated to be uncreated and immortal, because the universe has no power to act upon the initial seed of its own origin, just as a tree has no power to act upon the initial seed of its own origin.
We can rest assured that this Theory of Everything is not a new invention. The fact that human life constitutes the genotype of the phenotype universe, or the cosmic system's input and output, has been preached to us by many enlightened individuals. Christ is one of them. In Revelation 22-13 he disclosed the key to the origin of the universe: "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end." Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita is more straightforward. He told Prince Arjuna: "O Arjuna, I am the divine seed of all lives. In this world, nothing animate or inanimate exists without me."
Thus Krishna, just as Christ, tells us that human life is the procreative seed of the universe. Also in Islam the Prophet Mohammed is described as the seed of the universe.
Finally, Manly P. Hall made this observation in his monumental work, The Secret Teachings of All Ages: "A philosopher might declare that a universe could be made out of a man, but the foolish would regard this as an impossibility, not realizing that a man is a seed from which a universe may be brought forth."
Print
Email
