Fellow American Patriots win $millions-stop criminal politicians, employers & Marxist invaders.
Mark Lowry
August 22, 2007
Folks get your hungry attorneys and get to work on this. Maybe you can realize the American dream like the drug smuggler Ramos and Compean allegedly shot in the ass. I think he shot himself and now it looks like he is going to win $5 million by suing the government. The criminal illegal alien is winning the American Dream and so can you.
The American Lottery is famous for paying off criminal elected officials, and their political contributors. Maybe it is time for We the People to buy an American Lottery ticket in the litigation ring and see how far we can go. It looks like there is great potential for the We the People to get back a lot of that taxpayer money that has been stolen to pay for their illegal conspiracy to bring criminals into the country illegally.
You might want to be first in line because the courts are going to fill up with these cases as soon as the first one gets by.
American Patriots we need to mobilize our legal efforts and give this RICO act a try. It has worked before and can work again. The following is an over simplified statement taken from the Wikipedia, hardly the legal source, but it provides links to get to title 18 of the USC so start digging. I have and am ready to join up with the right attorney and get the ball rolling here in Lexington Kentucky the Sanctuary City of the United States. These folks define obstruction of justice in a manner that all others can understand.
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly referred to as RICO Act or RICO) is a United States federal law that provides for extended penalties for criminal acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-452, 84 Stat. 922 (15 October 1970). RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 through 18 U.S.C. § 1968. It was intended to make it easier to prosecute organized crime figures, but has been applied in several other cases as well.
Summary
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes—27 federal crimes and 8 state crimes—within a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the United States Attorney bringing the case, has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering. Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in prison per racketeering count. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity."
When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to temporarily seize a defendant's assets and prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. This provision was placed in the law because the owners of Mafia-related shell corporations often absconded with the assets. An injunction and/or performance bond ensures that there is something to seize in the event of a guilty verdict.
In many cases, the threat of a RICO indictment can force defendants to plead guilty to lesser charges, in part because the seizure of assets would make it difficult to pay a defense attorney. Despite its harsh provisions, a RICO-related charge is considered easy to prove in court, as it focuses on patterns of behavior as opposed to criminal acts.[2]
There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." The plaintiff must prove the existence of a "criminal enterprise." The defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s) and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like most Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or State court. [1] There are six critical elements the law requires to prove a RICO claim against an organization:
http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481
A) Defendant Person; B) Enterprise; C) Interstate commerce; D) Defendant’s management of the enterprise; E) Pattern; and F) Racketeering activity.
Taking a page from The Godfather, this example may help you understand how RICO works:
The Mafia is the organization (Enterprise). The head of this organization is the Godfather (Defendant Person). The organization engages in criminal activities, such as murder or bribery (Racketeering activity). The organization has been engaged in these criminal activities for generations (Pattern). The Godfather directs the minions in his organization to partake in illegal activities (Defendant’s management of the enterprise). Sometimes his minions cross state lines to kill or bribe (Interstate commerce).
Since the Godfather’s business model and activities satisfy RICO’s seven required elements, RICO can be used to prosecute the Godfather for these illegal acts. It does not matter that the Godfather may never have actually killed a potential witness or bribed an official.”
Both the federal and civil components allow for the recovery of treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory damages).
Although its primary intent was to deal with organized crime, Blakey said that Congress never intended it to merely apply to the Mob. He once told Time, "We don't want one set of rules for people whose collars are blue or whose names end in vowels, and another set for those whose collars are white and have Ivy League diplomas."[2]
RICO offenses Under the law, racketeering activity means:
Any violation of state statutes against gambling, murder, kidnapping, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in the Controlled Substances Act).
Any act of bribery, counterfeiting, theft, embezzlement, fraud, dealing in obscene matter, obstruction of justice, slavery, racketeering, gambling, money laundering, commission of murder-for-hire, and several other offenses covered under the Federal criminal code (Title 18).
Embezzlement of union funds.
Bankruptcy or securities fraud.
Drug trafficking.
Money laundering and related offenses.
Bringing in, aiding or assisting aliens in entering the country (if the action was for financial gain)
Acts of terrorism.
Pattern of racketeering activity requires at least two acts of racketeering activity, one of which occurred after the effective date of this chapter and the last of which occurred within ten years (excluding any period of imprisonment) after the commission of a prior act of racketeering activity; The Supreme Court has instructed federal courts to follow the continuity plus relationship test in order to determine whether the facts of a specific case give rise to an established pattern. Predicate acts are related if they "have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated events." H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. Continuity is both a closed and open ended concept, referring to either a closed period of conduct, or to past conduct that by its nature projects into the future with a threat of repetition.
Famous cases
On November 21, 1980, Frank "Funzi" Tieri was the first Mafia boss to be convicted under the RICO Act.
In June 1984, the Key West Police Department in Monroe County, FL was declared a criminal Enterprise under the Federal RICO statutes after a lengthy United States Department of Justice investigation. Several high-ranking officers of the department, including Deputy Police Chief Raymond Cassamayor, were arrested on federal charges of running a protection racket for illegal cocaine smugglers. [3] At trial, a witness testified he routinely delivered bags of cocaine to the Deputy Chief's office at City Hall. [4]
In 1990, financier Michael Milken was indicted on 98 counts of racketeering and fraud relating to an investigation into insider trading and other offenses. Milken was accused of using a wide-ranging network of contacts to manipulate stock and bond prices. It was one of the first occasions that a RICO indictment was brought against an individual with no ties to organized crime. Milken pleaded guilty to six lesser offenses rather than face spending the rest of his life in prison.
Two years earlier, Milken's employer, Drexel Burnham Lambert, was also threatened with a RICO indictment under the legal doctrine that corporations are responsible for their employees' crimes. Drexel avoided RICO charges by pleading guilty to lesser felonies; a RICO indictment would have almost certainly put Drexel out of business since its capital would have been tied up in its defense,[2] and banks will not extend credit to securities firms under RICO indictments.
On April 26, 2006 the Supreme Court heard Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Williams, which concerned what sort of corporations fell under the scope of RICO. Mohawk Industries had allegedly hired illegal aliens, in violation of RICO. The court will decide whether or not Mohawk Industries, along with recruiting agencies, constitutes an 'enterprise' that can be prosecuted under RICO.
On August 8, 2006 in Tampa, Florida several members of the street gang the Latin Kings were arrested in connection with RICO conspiracy charges and currently await trial, included in the arrest were Luis Hernandez, Celina Hernandez, Michael Rocca, Jessica Ramirez, Reinaldo Arroyo, Samual Alvarado, Omari Tolbert, Edwin DeLeon, and many others, totalling 39.
Also, in Tampa, on October 16, 2006, four members of the Gambino Crime Family (Terry Scaglione, Ronald Trucchio, Kevin McMahon, and Steven Catallono) were tried under RICO statues, found guilty and sentenced to life in prison.” End of Wikipedia
Another example may be (We are working on this now):
A. The defendant person could be the Mayor of LFUCG, or combined with the President of the Thoroughbred Association and multiple horse farm owners who control the political parties.
B. The enterprise=The Lexington Fayette Urban County government could be the enterprise with sub enterprises of the Thoroughbred Association, The Hispanic Association and a myriad of other Marxist Associations directly and indirectly funded and controlled by the prime enterprise.
C. Interstate and international commerce being the international transport of drugs and human aliens from Mexico and other points in the country to Lexington, Kentucky for specific use on other criminal enterprises, Horse Farms, by multiple defendant persons.
D. Defendant persons have been responsible for overseeing completion of the racketeering objectives and direction of employees including police officers in the completion of these duties. They are further directly involved in they have directed others or they themselves have been involved in hiring aiding and abetting criminal illegal aliens.
E. Racketeering pattern.The racketeering activities are ongoing for over 15 years starting officially with the first LFUCG Hispanic Committee under the Direction and control of the Mayor of the LFUCG. Elected officials and members of the Horse industry were on that committee and are still active in the criminal activity.. Criminal activity includes misuse of government funds to facilitate the illegal entry of aliens into the area and to aid and abet them in getting jobs and housing. The interstate activities include using police officers to be sent to Mexico to aid and abet the entry of illegal aliens. There is also a comprehensive scheme to obstruct justice by interfering with the lawful duties of law enforcement officers. There has been widespread violation of American Citizen civil rights by rendering law enforcement actions against citizens that are much harsher than enforcement against aliens. The local prosecutors indicate they do not prosecute alien criminals as severely because they don’t want to break up the families. The original members of the Hispanic committee openly stated they want to bring the illegals into the county for personal gain.
F. Damages to the community have been great. Multiple business failures because of imported cheap illegal labor, increased taxes to pay for illegal benefits, devaluation on citizen homes in the area because of increased crime and numerous direct assaults and crimes against the public have occurred costing the plaintiffs millions of dollars.
So what do you think fellow Patriots is it worth a shot to try to win the same American Lottery the crooked employers have been winning but this time we win it with legal action to recover what the criminals have stolen from us? Job losses can be expensive.
So what are you waiting for get that phone book out and find the first shyster lawyer you can and go to work for America.
The American Lottery is famous for paying off criminal elected officials, and their political contributors. Maybe it is time for We the People to buy an American Lottery ticket in the litigation ring and see how far we can go. It looks like there is great potential for the We the People to get back a lot of that taxpayer money that has been stolen to pay for their illegal conspiracy to bring criminals into the country illegally.
You might want to be first in line because the courts are going to fill up with these cases as soon as the first one gets by.
American Patriots we need to mobilize our legal efforts and give this RICO act a try. It has worked before and can work again. The following is an over simplified statement taken from the Wikipedia, hardly the legal source, but it provides links to get to title 18 of the USC so start digging. I have and am ready to join up with the right attorney and get the ball rolling here in Lexington Kentucky the Sanctuary City of the United States. These folks define obstruction of justice in a manner that all others can understand.
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly referred to as RICO Act or RICO) is a United States federal law that provides for extended penalties for criminal acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-452, 84 Stat. 922 (15 October 1970). RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 through 18 U.S.C. § 1968. It was intended to make it easier to prosecute organized crime figures, but has been applied in several other cases as well.
Summary
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes—27 federal crimes and 8 state crimes—within a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the United States Attorney bringing the case, has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering. Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in prison per racketeering count. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity."
When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to temporarily seize a defendant's assets and prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. This provision was placed in the law because the owners of Mafia-related shell corporations often absconded with the assets. An injunction and/or performance bond ensures that there is something to seize in the event of a guilty verdict.
In many cases, the threat of a RICO indictment can force defendants to plead guilty to lesser charges, in part because the seizure of assets would make it difficult to pay a defense attorney. Despite its harsh provisions, a RICO-related charge is considered easy to prove in court, as it focuses on patterns of behavior as opposed to criminal acts.[2]
There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." The plaintiff must prove the existence of a "criminal enterprise." The defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s) and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like most Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or State court. [1] There are six critical elements the law requires to prove a RICO claim against an organization:
http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481
A) Defendant Person; B) Enterprise; C) Interstate commerce; D) Defendant’s management of the enterprise; E) Pattern; and F) Racketeering activity.
Taking a page from The Godfather, this example may help you understand how RICO works:
The Mafia is the organization (Enterprise). The head of this organization is the Godfather (Defendant Person). The organization engages in criminal activities, such as murder or bribery (Racketeering activity). The organization has been engaged in these criminal activities for generations (Pattern). The Godfather directs the minions in his organization to partake in illegal activities (Defendant’s management of the enterprise). Sometimes his minions cross state lines to kill or bribe (Interstate commerce).
Since the Godfather’s business model and activities satisfy RICO’s seven required elements, RICO can be used to prosecute the Godfather for these illegal acts. It does not matter that the Godfather may never have actually killed a potential witness or bribed an official.”
Both the federal and civil components allow for the recovery of treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory damages).
Although its primary intent was to deal with organized crime, Blakey said that Congress never intended it to merely apply to the Mob. He once told Time, "We don't want one set of rules for people whose collars are blue or whose names end in vowels, and another set for those whose collars are white and have Ivy League diplomas."[2]
RICO offenses Under the law, racketeering activity means:
Any violation of state statutes against gambling, murder, kidnapping, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in the Controlled Substances Act).
Any act of bribery, counterfeiting, theft, embezzlement, fraud, dealing in obscene matter, obstruction of justice, slavery, racketeering, gambling, money laundering, commission of murder-for-hire, and several other offenses covered under the Federal criminal code (Title 18).
Embezzlement of union funds.
Bankruptcy or securities fraud.
Drug trafficking.
Money laundering and related offenses.
Bringing in, aiding or assisting aliens in entering the country (if the action was for financial gain)
Acts of terrorism.
Pattern of racketeering activity requires at least two acts of racketeering activity, one of which occurred after the effective date of this chapter and the last of which occurred within ten years (excluding any period of imprisonment) after the commission of a prior act of racketeering activity; The Supreme Court has instructed federal courts to follow the continuity plus relationship test in order to determine whether the facts of a specific case give rise to an established pattern. Predicate acts are related if they "have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated events." H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. Continuity is both a closed and open ended concept, referring to either a closed period of conduct, or to past conduct that by its nature projects into the future with a threat of repetition.
Famous cases
On November 21, 1980, Frank "Funzi" Tieri was the first Mafia boss to be convicted under the RICO Act.
In June 1984, the Key West Police Department in Monroe County, FL was declared a criminal Enterprise under the Federal RICO statutes after a lengthy United States Department of Justice investigation. Several high-ranking officers of the department, including Deputy Police Chief Raymond Cassamayor, were arrested on federal charges of running a protection racket for illegal cocaine smugglers. [3] At trial, a witness testified he routinely delivered bags of cocaine to the Deputy Chief's office at City Hall. [4]
In 1990, financier Michael Milken was indicted on 98 counts of racketeering and fraud relating to an investigation into insider trading and other offenses. Milken was accused of using a wide-ranging network of contacts to manipulate stock and bond prices. It was one of the first occasions that a RICO indictment was brought against an individual with no ties to organized crime. Milken pleaded guilty to six lesser offenses rather than face spending the rest of his life in prison.
Two years earlier, Milken's employer, Drexel Burnham Lambert, was also threatened with a RICO indictment under the legal doctrine that corporations are responsible for their employees' crimes. Drexel avoided RICO charges by pleading guilty to lesser felonies; a RICO indictment would have almost certainly put Drexel out of business since its capital would have been tied up in its defense,[2] and banks will not extend credit to securities firms under RICO indictments.
On April 26, 2006 the Supreme Court heard Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Williams, which concerned what sort of corporations fell under the scope of RICO. Mohawk Industries had allegedly hired illegal aliens, in violation of RICO. The court will decide whether or not Mohawk Industries, along with recruiting agencies, constitutes an 'enterprise' that can be prosecuted under RICO.
On August 8, 2006 in Tampa, Florida several members of the street gang the Latin Kings were arrested in connection with RICO conspiracy charges and currently await trial, included in the arrest were Luis Hernandez, Celina Hernandez, Michael Rocca, Jessica Ramirez, Reinaldo Arroyo, Samual Alvarado, Omari Tolbert, Edwin DeLeon, and many others, totalling 39.
Also, in Tampa, on October 16, 2006, four members of the Gambino Crime Family (Terry Scaglione, Ronald Trucchio, Kevin McMahon, and Steven Catallono) were tried under RICO statues, found guilty and sentenced to life in prison.” End of Wikipedia
Another example may be (We are working on this now):
A. The defendant person could be the Mayor of LFUCG, or combined with the President of the Thoroughbred Association and multiple horse farm owners who control the political parties.
B. The enterprise=The Lexington Fayette Urban County government could be the enterprise with sub enterprises of the Thoroughbred Association, The Hispanic Association and a myriad of other Marxist Associations directly and indirectly funded and controlled by the prime enterprise.
C. Interstate and international commerce being the international transport of drugs and human aliens from Mexico and other points in the country to Lexington, Kentucky for specific use on other criminal enterprises, Horse Farms, by multiple defendant persons.
D. Defendant persons have been responsible for overseeing completion of the racketeering objectives and direction of employees including police officers in the completion of these duties. They are further directly involved in they have directed others or they themselves have been involved in hiring aiding and abetting criminal illegal aliens.
E. Racketeering pattern.The racketeering activities are ongoing for over 15 years starting officially with the first LFUCG Hispanic Committee under the Direction and control of the Mayor of the LFUCG. Elected officials and members of the Horse industry were on that committee and are still active in the criminal activity.. Criminal activity includes misuse of government funds to facilitate the illegal entry of aliens into the area and to aid and abet them in getting jobs and housing. The interstate activities include using police officers to be sent to Mexico to aid and abet the entry of illegal aliens. There is also a comprehensive scheme to obstruct justice by interfering with the lawful duties of law enforcement officers. There has been widespread violation of American Citizen civil rights by rendering law enforcement actions against citizens that are much harsher than enforcement against aliens. The local prosecutors indicate they do not prosecute alien criminals as severely because they don’t want to break up the families. The original members of the Hispanic committee openly stated they want to bring the illegals into the county for personal gain.
F. Damages to the community have been great. Multiple business failures because of imported cheap illegal labor, increased taxes to pay for illegal benefits, devaluation on citizen homes in the area because of increased crime and numerous direct assaults and crimes against the public have occurred costing the plaintiffs millions of dollars.
So what do you think fellow Patriots is it worth a shot to try to win the same American Lottery the crooked employers have been winning but this time we win it with legal action to recover what the criminals have stolen from us? Job losses can be expensive.
So what are you waiting for get that phone book out and find the first shyster lawyer you can and go to work for America.
Print
Email
