Is It Worth Trying To Save The Everglades?
Considering that there's a good chance most of the Everglades will be under salt water in another hundred years or so, I'm beginning to wonder if the $2 billion might not be better spent on developing sustainable energy. This may sound odd, coming from a Florida boy, but -- there it is. It's time to be thinking about triage. Ditto the "restoration" of the Gulf Coast. What will a 2-foot rise in sea level do to all those new wetlands and other restored areas -- like NOLA?
What do you think? Is it worth trying to save the 'Glades, or should we be spending the money differently (although still on the environment)?