Euro-liberals and Islamic Terrorists in common insults against Kemal Ataturk!

Euro-liberals and Islamic Terrorists in common insults against Kemal Ataturk!

In an earlier article, we unveiled the inconsistent, irresponsible and catastrophic attempt of European Liberals to offer support to the Islamist terrorist ‘professor’ Yayla, who had it easy to publicly denigrate in Turkey the brilliant, impeccable and irreproachable legacy of the Founder of the Only Democratic and Secular state of the Islamic World, Kemal Ataturk.

The European Liberal support of the nefarious extremist Islamist Turk took recently the form of an article written by the hand of a misinformed and misinforming European Parliament Liberal deputy, namely Mr. Andrew Duff; the article was entitled “A challenge to Turkey’s ideologues” and it was published in the Financial Times (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/eeb2d648-1411-11dc-88cb-000b5df10621.html).

It is essential to extensively focus on the Ataturk refuters and denigrators in order to find out what their common denominator is; Mr. Duff tries to say that the Turkish Islamist’s speech did not consist in a serious issue, that he should not face legal charges, and that in brief it is very normal for anyone to reject and even denigrate Kemal Ataturk in the same way it is allowed for instance to pour scorn on President Bush!

Ideologues in Turkey are only the perilous gangsters of the Islamist premier.

Speaking about Prof.Yayla’s seminar, Mr. Duff says the following:

The theme of the seminar was how Kemalism, the official ideology of the Turkish state, had adapted over the years - or failed to adapt - and how, today, Turkey’s bid to join the European Union posed new challenges to the ideologues”.

Kemalism failed to adapt!

Who says this?

A Westernized Turkish intellectual, who would like Turkey’s society and political establishment to be identical with that of Sweden and Switzerland?

We could then listen attentively! He would certainly describe Kemal Ataturk’s positive aspects of sociopolitical and cultural heritage, and then proceed with a criticism, about either Kemal Ataturk’s political choices or his followers’ lack of innovative approach and value reconsideration and update. It would be logical, reasonable and utile.

The Islamist terrorist Prof. Yayla did nothing of the sort; for the Islamic Academic Terrorist, Kemal Ataturk’s negative points are

the adoption of the Latin alphabet for the Turkish language,

the abolition of the Caliphate,

the promulgation of Sunday as non working day,

the prohibition of the “Islamic” headscarf and the traditional Islamic clothes for men,

the imposition of the Secular, Laic state of Turkey instead of the anachronistic religious state, and plenty of related changes.

The identity of a commentator illuminates clearly his background, approach, targets. Both Churchill and Stalin rejected Hitler, but this does not imply even for a moment that a democratic intellectual, politician and statesman should adopt and/or support Stalin’s anti-Nazi argumentation.

Mr. Duff should pay greater importance to nuances.

Furthermore, Mr. Duff failed to identify who the ‘ideologues’ are in Turkey! The only political ideological party today is the Islamist extremist party of the perilous and devious premier Erdogan who promotes a simulation process throughout the Turkish society, trying to intimidate democrats, liberals, secularists and fully Westernized masses through the publicly paid activities of his thugs.

Erdogan acts as a most hideous and villain beggar, demanding from the vociferously anti-Western Gulf Emirs pocket money in order to pay his gangs for their daily anti-Western, anti-European and anti-Christian activities at the local, social level.

Quite contrarily to Erdogan, the various anti-Islamic parties of Turkey that form an outright majority of about 70% have slight ideological differences one from another.

Mr. Duff’s gun has no bullets….

Mr. Duff’s anti-Ataturk hysteria turns to paranoia

His approach leads him to self-contarditions and ultimate paranoia; the following excerpt is enough to highlight them:

Dr Yayla was not uncritical of the EU, making the point that it should not be equated with civilisation and that its creed of tolerance is not always observed in practice. But the most controversial part of the speech criticised the cult around the personality of Ataturk. Dr Yayla called for a rational debate. Turkey in the EU would be a liberal democracy where the hero worship would be modified. Turkey outside the EU, with Kemalism unreformed, would be “like Jordan or Syria”.

This is sheer paranoia! There is no hero worship in Turkey; this is a lie. There is simply and plainly respect for the Founder of the Only Secular and Democratic State within the Islamic Sea of Barbarous, Analphabetic and Cannibalistic bogus-kings and tyranno-presidents.

There is only veneration and admiration for the Man who managed to institutionalize what lewd and coarse dictators failed even to envision (let alone implement) in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Morocco, Algeria, Syria, Palestine, Pakistan, Iran, Nigeria and Indonesia.

Where a Nasserist trash like Qadhafi failed in the 1990s, Kemal Ataturk was successful in the early 1920s. A chaotic difference!

However, it is not on this occasion where Mr. Duff’s worship of the villainous and murderous bogus-kings and presidents gets revealed.

Accepting the Islamist terrorist purposes of Prof. Yayla, Mr. Duff says that “outside Europe and with Kemalism unreformed, Turkey will be like Jordan and Syria”.

This is an aberration!

Turkey is still outside Europe; let’s assume that Kemalism has been so far unreformed. Turkey has nothing in common with either Jordan or Syria at the political, social, behavioural, cultural, intellectual, educational, and economic levels. How would Turkey be like these states from which Turkey differs so markedly and strikingly, if Turkey remains the same (assumingly unreformed and secluded/excluded from the EU)? You don’t need to study Aristotle’s logic to realize how inconsistent this ridiculous statement is.

Even a child would realize that if you are now different from something else, and both remain unchanged, then you will not be “like your opposite”!

The chaotic difference between Civilized Turkey and Arabophone Barbary

Turkey is a secular state, and a democratic and multipartite society whereby religion has no place at the level of the administration and politics. Sunday and Saturday are non working days.

Contrarily, Assad’s Syria and Abdallah’s Jordan are religious tyrannical and undemocratic states run by fanaticized ignorant sheikhs who oblige the state to accept Friday as non working day so that they - through social pressure - gather in mosques the outright majority of the men to have them exposed to their maniac screaming that is full of hysterical hatred addressed against the West, against Israel, and against Secularism.

If Erdogan prevails thanks to the paranoid support offered to him by the idiotic, gullible and pathetic Liberals of Europe, Turkey will become like Syria and Jordan.

The truth is 100% opposite to the irrelevant misinformation of the Liberal Euro-deputy who got his globally dangerous text easily published in the Financial Times.

Who insults Kemal Ataturk?

It would be perhaps at this point quite useful to identify the Ataturk denigrators and through their vocabulary to understand their ideas and their political agendas. This would certainly help the devious, apostate Euro-apathetic deputy better conceive the tragic dimensions of his deception.

The Web is a wonderful tool for parallel research that anyone could undertake at will. We may offer here only an indicative paradigm.

Similar approach and vocabulary reminiscent of that employed by the academic terrorist, Prof. Yayla, can be found in a blog entitled “ Truth about Jewish Gay Dictator Mustafa Kemal Exposed”. The link is: http://m-kemal.blogspot.com/

Here you have selected readings:

Reading 1

Jewish Gay Dictator Mustafa Kemal was a Freemason and a British agent. In Turkey, once the children start school, they are forced to admire Jewish Mustafa Kemal in order to justify his anti-Islamic actions. Once the students graduate from the high school or university, they admire and respect Jewish Mustafa Kemal to such an extent that they do not even question his reforms (in fact, no one can ever dare to so, due to the state laws). This is how the oppressive kemalist/Jewish secular regime in Turkey is brainwashing the new generations. The main goal of this brainwashing campaign is to make the Muslim Turks turn away from Islam and forget their glorious History.”

Reading 2

There were two questions I wanted to ask, I said over the phone to Batya Keinan, spokeswoman for Israeli president Ezer Weizman, who was about to leave the next day, Monday, Jan. 24, on the first visit ever made to Turkey by a Jewish chief of state. One was whether Mr. Weizman would be taking part in an official ceremony commemorating Kemal Ataturk.

Ms. Kenan checked the president's itinerary, according to which he and his wife would lay a wreath on Ataturk's grave the morning of their arrival, and asked what my second question was.

"Does President Weizman know that Ataturk had Jewish ancestors and was taught Hebrew prayers as a boy?"

"Of course, of course," she answered as unsurprisedly as if I had inquired whether the president was aware that Ataturk was Turkey's national hero.

Excited and Distressed

I thanked her and hung up. A few minutes later it occurred to me to call back and ask whether President Weizman intended to make any reference while in Turkey to Ataturk's Jewish antecedents. "I'm so glad you called again," said Ms. Kenan, who now sounded excited and a bit distressed. "Exactly where did you get your information from?"

Why was she asking, I countered, if the president's office had it too?

Because it did not, she confessed. She had only assumed that it must because I had sounded so matter-of-fact myself. "After you hung up," she said, "I mentioned what you told me and nobody here knows anything about it. Could you please fax us what you know?"

I faxed her a short version of it. Here is a longer one.

Stories about the Jewishness of Ataturk, whose statue stands in the main square of every town and city in Turkey, already circulated in his lifetime but were denied by him and his family and never taken seriously by biographers. Of six biographies of him that I consulted this week, none even mentions such a speculation. The only scholarly reference to it in print that I could find was in the entry on Ataturk in the Israeli Entsiklopedya ha-Ivrit, which begins:

"Mustafa Kemal Ataturk - (1881-1938), Turkish general and statesman and founder of the modern Turkish state.

"Mustafa Kemal was born to the family of a minor customs clerk in Salonika and lost his father when he was young. There is no proof of the belief, widespread among both Jews and Muslims in Turkey, that his family came from the Doenme. As a boy he rebelled against his mother's desire to give him a traditional religious education, and at the age of 12 he was sent at his demand to study in a military academy."

Secular Father

The Doenme were an underground sect of Sabbetaians, Turkish Jews who took Muslim names and outwardly behaved like Muslims but secretly believed in Sabbetai Zevi, the 17th-century false messiah, and conducted carefully guarded prayers and rituals in his name. The encyclopedia's version of Ataturk's education, however, is somewhat at variance with his own. Here is his account of it as quoted by his biographers:

"My father was a man of liberal views, rather hostile to religion, and a partisan of Western ideas. He would have preferred to see me go to a lay school, which did not found its teaching on the Koran but on modern science.

"In this battle of consciences, my father managed to gain the victory after a small maneuver; he pretended to give in to my mother's wishes, and arranged that I should enter the (Islamic) school of Fatma Molla Kadin with the traditional ceremony. ...

"Six months later, more or less, my father quietly withdrew me from the school and took me to that of old Shemsi Effendi who directed a free preparatory school according to European methods. My mother made no objection, since her desires had been complied with and her conventions respected. It was the ceremony above all which had satisfied her."

Who was Mustafa Kemal's father, who behaved here in typical Doenme fashion, outwardly observing Muslim ceremonies while inwardly scoffing at them? Ataturk's mother Zubeyde came from the mountains west of Salonika, close to the current Albanian frontier; of the origins of his father, Ali Riza, little is known. Different writers have given them as Albanian, Anatolian and Salonikan, and Lord Kinross' compendious 1964 "Ataturk" calls Ali Riza a "shadowy personality" and adds cryptically regarding Ataturk's reluctance to disclose more about his family background: "To the child of so mixed an environment it would seldom occur, wherever his racial loyalties lay, to inquire too exactly into his personal origins beyond that of his parentage."

Learning Hebrew

Did Kinross suspect more than he was admitting? I would never have asked had I not recently come across a remarkable chapter while browsing in the out-of-print Hebrew autobiography of Itamar Ben-Avi, son of Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, the leading promoter of the revival of spoken Hebrew in late 19th-century Palestine. Ben-Avi, the first child to be raised in Hebrew since ancient times and later a Hebrew journalist and newspaper publisher, writes in this book of walking into the Kamenitz Hotel in Jerusalem one autumn night in 1911 and being asked by its proprietor:

" 'Do you see that Turkish officer sitting there in the corner, the one with the bottle of arrack?' "

" 'Yes.' "

" 'He's one of the most important officers in the Turkish army.' "

" 'What's his name?' "

" 'Mustafa Kemal.' "

" 'I'd like to meet him,' I said, because the minute I looked at him I was startled by his piercing green eyes."

Ben-Avi describes two meetings with Mustafa Kemal, who had not yet taken the name of Ataturk, 'Father of the Turks.' Both were conducted in French, were largely devoted to Ottoman politics, and were doused with large amounts of arrack. In the first of these, Kemal confided:

"I'm a descendant of Sabbetai Zevi - not indeed a Jew any more, but an ardent admirer of this prophet of yours. My opinion is that every Jew in this country would do well to join his camp."

During their second meeting, held 10 days later in the same hotel, Mustafa Kemal said at one point:

" 'I have at home a Hebrew Bible printed in Venice. It's rather old, and I remember my father bringing me to a Karaite teacher who taught me to read it. I can still remember a few words of it, such as --' "

And Ben-Avi continues:

"He paused for a moment, his eyes searching for something in space. Then he recalled:

" 'Shema Yisra'el, Adonai Elohenu, Adonai Ehad!'

" 'That's our most important prayer, Captain.'

" 'And my secret prayer too, cher monsieur,' he replied, refilling our glasses."

Although Itamar Ben-Avi could not have known it, Ataturk no doubt meant "secret prayer" quite literally.”

Reading 3

People! Is it not true that the new western dress code, which was brought by the enemies of Islam after the establishment of the oppressive secular republic by Jews, is against the Human Rights - how can one be forced to wear a specific style? The so-called secular democratic republic is only written on paper and their constitution. There has never been true democracy in Turkey since 1923. In particular, Jewish Mustafa Kemal's time was an extreme dictatorship. Everything is controlled by the Army which is run by Jews. The current Military chief general Yasar Buyukanit is also an ardent zionist Jew who has relatives in Israel.

Jews and Freemasons, who co-operated with west and founded secular regime over Muslim blood, tried to scrape off the roots of Islam from Muslim Turkey; they made Muslim Turks turn their back to Muslim world, beg West and forget their Islamic past. After the establishment of the new secular regime by these Jews, Turkey, while even signing the Moudros armistice after WWI being one of the major and respected country in the world, today became a reserve state of Zionist Israel and a puppet of EU and USA.”

Conclusion

When you reach the point of reading that Turkish General Buyukanit has Jewish family in Israel, you realize that you have to move immediately to a more serious website. The same conclusion you draw when you happen to read the text of the Euro-deputy of Hamas, Mr. Duff….