Through no fault of her own, Harriet Miers should be rejected in committee
"People are interested to know why I picked Harriet Miers. ... Part of Harriet Miers' life is her religion."
But, Article 6, Paragraph 3 of the Constitution of the United States clearly states:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
So, my questions are these:
- Is the President unaware of these restrictions, which are clearly articulated in the Constitution of the United States? Or,
- Does the President realize that, as an official within the government, he is bound by, and obligated to uphold, the Constitution of the United States? Or,
- Is the President simply dismissive of the Constitution of the United States?
It is not Harriet Miers who has done anything wrong. An individual's religious belief is personal and should be beyond public scrutiny. However, the President has by inference admitted that he violated the U.S. Constitution in his selection process. The President will probably say that the Supreme Court appointment is his choice and how he makes his choice is a private matter. But under the laws of the United States that is not the case.
Harriet Miers may have all of the qualifications necessarry to serve as a Supreme Court Justice. But the President has clearly tainted her nomination and, consequently, rendered her an unsuitable candidate.
If for no other reason than this, Harriet Miers should be rejected in committee.