Cuts in food aid threaten lives and national security
William Lambers
February 17, 2011
The budget cuts to international food aid, as proposed by the House of Representatives, will threaten millions of lives. These funding cuts, which total over $800 million, will cause immense damage to our foreign policy.
There is a hunger crisis afflicting nearly 1 billion people worldwide. This crisis is hardest on children who, trapped in war or disaster zones, or living in poverty, depend on access to proper foods for their survival and growth.
How do we expect peace and stability to emerge in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Sudan and other countries if the people are hungry and malnourished? We all saw in Egypt how high food prices and malnutrition caused massive discontent among the population. Food security is integral to any nation's well-being.
The cost of food aid is a relatively small part of the budget. There is not much to be saved by cutting hunger-fighting programs. Clearly, there are programs far less important that can be cut instead. Look at some of the ongoing waste identified by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.
According to Reuters, Gates "blasted lawmakers blocking the Pentagon's five-year effort to cancel a $6 billion interchangeable engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter being built by General Electric (GE.N) and Britain's Rolls-Royce Group (RR.L)."
Gates said, "We consider it an unnecessary and extravagant expense." If Congress were to budget a small portion of that money toward the World Food Programme, it could fund operations in multiple countries where peace and reconstruction are on the line. Food is what can tip the balance.
But instead, food aid is being reduced in the House proposed budget with little regard to the consequences. We can cut every program we have, but we still need to have a foreign policy. Fighting hunger and boosting agricultural production are crucial elements of our foreign policy, and not emphasized nearly enough.
The question to lawmakers is have you thought these proposed budget cuts through? Considering that hunger and malnutrition afflict nearly 1 billion people worldwide suggests that the House of Representatives has not.
Visit the World Food Program USA take action page to contact Congress.
There is a hunger crisis afflicting nearly 1 billion people worldwide. This crisis is hardest on children who, trapped in war or disaster zones, or living in poverty, depend on access to proper foods for their survival and growth.
How do we expect peace and stability to emerge in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Sudan and other countries if the people are hungry and malnourished? We all saw in Egypt how high food prices and malnutrition caused massive discontent among the population. Food security is integral to any nation's well-being.
The cost of food aid is a relatively small part of the budget. There is not much to be saved by cutting hunger-fighting programs. Clearly, there are programs far less important that can be cut instead. Look at some of the ongoing waste identified by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.
According to Reuters, Gates "blasted lawmakers blocking the Pentagon's five-year effort to cancel a $6 billion interchangeable engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter being built by General Electric (GE.N) and Britain's Rolls-Royce Group (RR.L)."
Gates said, "We consider it an unnecessary and extravagant expense." If Congress were to budget a small portion of that money toward the World Food Programme, it could fund operations in multiple countries where peace and reconstruction are on the line. Food is what can tip the balance.
But instead, food aid is being reduced in the House proposed budget with little regard to the consequences. We can cut every program we have, but we still need to have a foreign policy. Fighting hunger and boosting agricultural production are crucial elements of our foreign policy, and not emphasized nearly enough.
The question to lawmakers is have you thought these proposed budget cuts through? Considering that hunger and malnutrition afflict nearly 1 billion people worldwide suggests that the House of Representatives has not.
Visit the World Food Program USA take action page to contact Congress.
Print
Email
