Repetition Teaches
Monica King
December 02, 2010
My Beloved Readers: Let me share with you my letter to Barry Moore, Reentry Program Case Manager at the St. Johnsbury Community Justice Center in Vermont...
Dear Barry Moore:
I sent you three VoiceMails this AM after traveling with a reliable witness/reporter to Greenfield, MA jail where we both visited Tim within the confines of the facility.
This is what is TRUE about what Timothy & I were led to believe about his current living facilities:
He is in Franklin County Jail. Fern Theroux & I both saw him talked with him & visited this facility.
We were allowed to visit from 1-4pm.
What is FALSE:
We were not allowed anything close to a "contact visit" which is what Tim told both Fern & myself would be the case when "boarded" by Vermont State Authorities in MA jail awaiting due process...We were allowed to visit in the classical corridor wherein there is bullet-proof glass to see each other through & an automated phone system to speak to each other with.
Fern's reaction to my report to him as an Advocate or Leader of the Disabled American Veterans Chapter in St. J concerning the ritual strip searches the inmates at NERCF are subjected to was one of shock, denial & disbelief. However he was able to corroborate my report as a second witness who WENT to see Tim that Tim in fact has been ritually subjected to this routine within NERCF his entire tenancy there, & that this procedure awaited him after our visit even where there was no way any sort of contraband or other material could have been passed between a visitor & an inmate.
Commentary: Ritual humiliation of this type is a known component of what in military-speak is known as "psy-ops" a type of psychological warfare wherein the prisoner is disarmed of his or her natural abilities to fight captivity by breaking down natural self-esteem in order to imprison a prisoner from within...a way to create the beginnings of the Stockholm Syndrome well documented in hostage taking situations & covered in Professional journals of Psychologists & Trauma & Interventionist therapists.
Next, Fern met with me for 3 hours the evening before to examine the SAME documents I have given you for safe-keeping in your offices. Specifically the Probation & Parole hearing result. Dated 7/29/2010.
To review: this document states with a simple x in a box that the reason for his denial given was "Violation of Abuse Order". Naturally Fern wanted to know what Order this was referring to. I responded I did not know, but my educated guess is that it refers to an Abuse order rendered at the time of his captivity when he was accused of "domestic violence" against his Aunt P in Montpelier.
To reason this out together, let us answer these journalistic questions together;
Since August of last year where else has Tim BEEN? You are welcome to LOOK at the videos, & listen to the recorded conversations in his account at NERCF since last August. He has not been FREE since last August to violate ANY Abuse order.
He could not have violated an Order that was related to me, since I was nowhere in the vicinity of Tim at the time of his arrest & captivity. I was in New Hampshire with a bike & moved quietly & peaceably from Milton & the land we were living on while clearing it of some wooded areas. Once we separated, I went to Laconia & I have ample Federal usps letters to prove where I was.
Commentary; the Police blotter stated that Tim was accused of domestic violence against an unnamed woman in the report. Reason leads us all to understand it could NOT possibly have been me, & this I know is your greatest concern to discern.
Timothy in FACT has been a resident of St. Johnsbury, Vermont for over a year & is currently a registered voter in this city. What other cred does he need at Law? Being a Rhodes scholar? The Laws are not about being perfect of elitists, the laws are to guarantee ALL due process at Law.
SO, here we have a situation wherein I am fully prepared to testify that I have Witnessed violations of the U.S. Constitution that were purposefully & with intent designed to obstruct these basic Constitutional rights by those empowered by the Vermont Bar Association to protect vigorously. These folks are not ignorant of the Laws of the land certainly, which makes for the greater liability. Having attended another adult male's trial in Federal Court in Burlington over an Abuse situation I can guarantee that that woman Judge made sure the defendant KNEW ignorance of the Law is no excuse in her Court. And her Lawful role within the Court was to make SURE he learned those laws & the consequences of violating them...severe & swift.
Here is the clause I have SEEN purposefully & with ill intent violated in Tim's Case by authorities empowered by the State of Vermont to wield such Discretion & therefore Abuses of discretion:
U.S. Constitution: Sixth Amendment
Sixth Amendment - Rights of Accused in Criminal Prosecutions
Amendment Text | Annotations
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
I find it embarrassing FOR the Vermont Bar passed Esquires who understand this basic Constitutional right that I have to cut & paste this section of the Constitution to refresh Your understanding but it is Foundational to the rest of Tim's case.
In Tim's case, his first attorney assigned to him, Jeff Wilson, messed up his first Court ordered Appearance in Barre District Court. So Tim, through circumstances literally outside of his control failed to Appear.
This rendered, according to my research into the matter with Bail Bonds persons, Tim unacceptable as a person who could be bailed out. The Bail being set at 1,000.00 The sum authorities also knew within Vermont was the total of my fixed income, therefore out of reach for me to post; his sole friend & support since captivity.
The expected & predictable outcome of this was further separation of us & a string of attorneys appearing for Tim as required by law & subsequent Withdrawals. This is all on Court records within Barre District & Washington County Courts.
The RESULT was that Timothy ACTUALLY became in situ a resident of St. Johnsbury. And continued, in this hobbled fashion to seek release from prison, exercising his Vermont State Constitutional right to Vote & did so this past election by absentee ballot. This also has been recorded & can be verified by checking with the Town Clerks in St. J Manager's offices.
I moved here in April because one Rubin Jennings advised Tim to plea to the unjust charges filled with purposefully misleading accusations as he would likely get out faster from the prison, at his early release date in May. I came, I relocated & found a suitable apartment for myself & Tim, two middle-aged, heterosexual, monogamously committed people or 'true' Vermonters as the locals say, & this common sense plan has met with inexplicably virulent opposition as I have already detailed in past letters & conversations with you.
Commentary: I believe the reasons behind this opposition are that Tim witnessed some blatant Abuses of Authorities shoulder to shoulder WITH me in the retrial I underwent at the mandated & compelled insistence of unlawful "color of law" authorities who abused their discretion in New Hampshire earlier in the February month of 2009. Please see :
www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/107311
NOW I ask you to review just exactly how many words his current attorney at Law Seth Lipschutz has devoted to Tim's vigorous assistance at Law to restore a modicum of justice in his own life & mine.
Note in the letter I gave you a copy of that Seth says on November 3rd, one full month's time ahead of the next Calendared date of Tim's Pros Se claim filed properly & lawfully within Caledonia Superior Court, that he, Seth has already told Tim he is a loser & that he is sorry to disappoint him but he will not win.
I encourage you to bring this letter to your Director of the Restorative Justice Center in St. Johnsbury for her commentary as a peer reviewer of this particular letter & ask her if she would consider this a "due diligence" type of letter an Advocate of a client would or should draft & send to a client.
Commentary; this man would not last a week as a nursing assistant in any facility rendering care to the aged & elderly in this State or this country.
To write one very brief letter at the start of the month telling your client he is a loser because he did not complete a "grievance procedure" adequately while under duress, & held against his will by the State, being lured into a plea agreement not reflecting TRUE circumstances of what led Tim into this entrapped situation rises in my book to the level of malicious & illegal malpractice of law.
These are not innocent "mistakes" or innocent "misunderstandings". If these assertions in Mr. Lipschutze's letter were true, is it not part of his job & Advocacy before any Court in any of the United States to render counsel & assistance to rectify these deficits he has indicated instead of telling Tim he will lose & just resign himself to this sorry fate?
Commentary: Again I have interviewed Tim & know that if he did not properly complete this process it was not for lack of intelligence or desire to do so. It was because he was abruptly & summarily swept away into another prison in another State & ALL of his personal possessions were STOLEN from him by those holding him against his will.
Who bears the greater responsibility in this Case? The Prisoner or the Prisoners Rights Attorney assigned to Tim by the Court?
Who has the freedom & the means of CORRECTING this deficit at Law? The Prisoner or the Prisoners Rights Attorney assigned to him by the Court?
Who has more free time to correct them? The attorney with a job & a vehicle or the prisoner who can not get out of a cage?
Would this be the standard your director would consider professional in conduct were Tim her client? I am asking this as she is a peer in the Judicial branch of law, a Bar passed attorney? is there not an ethical charge here to keep the Lawyers who function lawfully above reproach in carrying out their duties at Law by regulating their own? As we do with our Boards of Nursing?
Question; I ask of you, of The Director & those I choose to cc this Case & letter to for a wider commentary & to urge more Public disclosure of the ways & means of adjudicating justice within Caledonia County & the State of Vermont.
One final note in our updated findings of yesterday's visit; Fern asked Tim if the inmates from Vermont had requested that Vermont Law books & statutes be made available to them in the Massacusetts facility. Tim responded that they had all been told that; once moved, Vermont Law books were supposed to be in the library before they arrived. To date those books are not in the library.
I sincerely request both of your physical presences at the next calendared status Hearing scheduled for this case in matter in Caledonia Superior Civil Court on December 6, 2010, 10 am.
Sincerely, Monica King, Esq. (ret) Justice of the Peace, New Hampshire
ACTUAL CONTENT of Mr. Lipshutz'es letter to his assigned client:
Timothy Duranleau
Franklin Cty. House of Corrections
CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL MAIL
160 Elm Street
Greenfield, MA 01301
Re: Duranleau v. Pallito
Docket No. 166-6-10Cacv NOVEMBER 3, 2010
Dear Mr. Duranleau:
I have completed my review of your case. Unfortunately, I do not have good news for you.
First of all, the furlough statute gives DOC complete discretion to set furlough conditions. This includes residence. So, you cannot win this case. Second of all, you did not finish the grievance procedure all the way through. That is an independent reason why you cannot win this case.
I am sorry about the bad news. I suggest that I dismiss this case for you. Your best bet would be to start seriously working on release in Washington County.
I will dismiss this case for you unless I receive a letter from you by November 24, 2010. Otherwise I will file a motion to withdraw & you will have to represent yourself.
Sincerely, Seth Lipschutz
Prisoners Rights Office
What Mr. Lipschutz FAILS to mention is the FACT that 3 separate Motions Tim drafted, printed & sent via usps mails from Greenfield, MA to St. Johnsbury, VT to ask for a PHYSICAL appearance in this Court went missing between these two New England States.
cc Interpol
Dear Barry Moore:
I sent you three VoiceMails this AM after traveling with a reliable witness/reporter to Greenfield, MA jail where we both visited Tim within the confines of the facility.
This is what is TRUE about what Timothy & I were led to believe about his current living facilities:
He is in Franklin County Jail. Fern Theroux & I both saw him talked with him & visited this facility.
We were allowed to visit from 1-4pm.
What is FALSE:
We were not allowed anything close to a "contact visit" which is what Tim told both Fern & myself would be the case when "boarded" by Vermont State Authorities in MA jail awaiting due process...We were allowed to visit in the classical corridor wherein there is bullet-proof glass to see each other through & an automated phone system to speak to each other with.
Fern's reaction to my report to him as an Advocate or Leader of the Disabled American Veterans Chapter in St. J concerning the ritual strip searches the inmates at NERCF are subjected to was one of shock, denial & disbelief. However he was able to corroborate my report as a second witness who WENT to see Tim that Tim in fact has been ritually subjected to this routine within NERCF his entire tenancy there, & that this procedure awaited him after our visit even where there was no way any sort of contraband or other material could have been passed between a visitor & an inmate.
Commentary: Ritual humiliation of this type is a known component of what in military-speak is known as "psy-ops" a type of psychological warfare wherein the prisoner is disarmed of his or her natural abilities to fight captivity by breaking down natural self-esteem in order to imprison a prisoner from within...a way to create the beginnings of the Stockholm Syndrome well documented in hostage taking situations & covered in Professional journals of Psychologists & Trauma & Interventionist therapists.
Next, Fern met with me for 3 hours the evening before to examine the SAME documents I have given you for safe-keeping in your offices. Specifically the Probation & Parole hearing result. Dated 7/29/2010.
To review: this document states with a simple x in a box that the reason for his denial given was "Violation of Abuse Order". Naturally Fern wanted to know what Order this was referring to. I responded I did not know, but my educated guess is that it refers to an Abuse order rendered at the time of his captivity when he was accused of "domestic violence" against his Aunt P in Montpelier.
To reason this out together, let us answer these journalistic questions together;
Since August of last year where else has Tim BEEN? You are welcome to LOOK at the videos, & listen to the recorded conversations in his account at NERCF since last August. He has not been FREE since last August to violate ANY Abuse order.
He could not have violated an Order that was related to me, since I was nowhere in the vicinity of Tim at the time of his arrest & captivity. I was in New Hampshire with a bike & moved quietly & peaceably from Milton & the land we were living on while clearing it of some wooded areas. Once we separated, I went to Laconia & I have ample Federal usps letters to prove where I was.
Commentary; the Police blotter stated that Tim was accused of domestic violence against an unnamed woman in the report. Reason leads us all to understand it could NOT possibly have been me, & this I know is your greatest concern to discern.
Timothy in FACT has been a resident of St. Johnsbury, Vermont for over a year & is currently a registered voter in this city. What other cred does he need at Law? Being a Rhodes scholar? The Laws are not about being perfect of elitists, the laws are to guarantee ALL due process at Law.
SO, here we have a situation wherein I am fully prepared to testify that I have Witnessed violations of the U.S. Constitution that were purposefully & with intent designed to obstruct these basic Constitutional rights by those empowered by the Vermont Bar Association to protect vigorously. These folks are not ignorant of the Laws of the land certainly, which makes for the greater liability. Having attended another adult male's trial in Federal Court in Burlington over an Abuse situation I can guarantee that that woman Judge made sure the defendant KNEW ignorance of the Law is no excuse in her Court. And her Lawful role within the Court was to make SURE he learned those laws & the consequences of violating them...severe & swift.
Here is the clause I have SEEN purposefully & with ill intent violated in Tim's Case by authorities empowered by the State of Vermont to wield such Discretion & therefore Abuses of discretion:
U.S. Constitution: Sixth Amendment
Sixth Amendment - Rights of Accused in Criminal Prosecutions
Amendment Text | Annotations
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
I find it embarrassing FOR the Vermont Bar passed Esquires who understand this basic Constitutional right that I have to cut & paste this section of the Constitution to refresh Your understanding but it is Foundational to the rest of Tim's case.
In Tim's case, his first attorney assigned to him, Jeff Wilson, messed up his first Court ordered Appearance in Barre District Court. So Tim, through circumstances literally outside of his control failed to Appear.
This rendered, according to my research into the matter with Bail Bonds persons, Tim unacceptable as a person who could be bailed out. The Bail being set at 1,000.00 The sum authorities also knew within Vermont was the total of my fixed income, therefore out of reach for me to post; his sole friend & support since captivity.
The expected & predictable outcome of this was further separation of us & a string of attorneys appearing for Tim as required by law & subsequent Withdrawals. This is all on Court records within Barre District & Washington County Courts.
The RESULT was that Timothy ACTUALLY became in situ a resident of St. Johnsbury. And continued, in this hobbled fashion to seek release from prison, exercising his Vermont State Constitutional right to Vote & did so this past election by absentee ballot. This also has been recorded & can be verified by checking with the Town Clerks in St. J Manager's offices.
I moved here in April because one Rubin Jennings advised Tim to plea to the unjust charges filled with purposefully misleading accusations as he would likely get out faster from the prison, at his early release date in May. I came, I relocated & found a suitable apartment for myself & Tim, two middle-aged, heterosexual, monogamously committed people or 'true' Vermonters as the locals say, & this common sense plan has met with inexplicably virulent opposition as I have already detailed in past letters & conversations with you.
Commentary: I believe the reasons behind this opposition are that Tim witnessed some blatant Abuses of Authorities shoulder to shoulder WITH me in the retrial I underwent at the mandated & compelled insistence of unlawful "color of law" authorities who abused their discretion in New Hampshire earlier in the February month of 2009. Please see :
www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/107311
NOW I ask you to review just exactly how many words his current attorney at Law Seth Lipschutz has devoted to Tim's vigorous assistance at Law to restore a modicum of justice in his own life & mine.
Note in the letter I gave you a copy of that Seth says on November 3rd, one full month's time ahead of the next Calendared date of Tim's Pros Se claim filed properly & lawfully within Caledonia Superior Court, that he, Seth has already told Tim he is a loser & that he is sorry to disappoint him but he will not win.
I encourage you to bring this letter to your Director of the Restorative Justice Center in St. Johnsbury for her commentary as a peer reviewer of this particular letter & ask her if she would consider this a "due diligence" type of letter an Advocate of a client would or should draft & send to a client.
Commentary; this man would not last a week as a nursing assistant in any facility rendering care to the aged & elderly in this State or this country.
To write one very brief letter at the start of the month telling your client he is a loser because he did not complete a "grievance procedure" adequately while under duress, & held against his will by the State, being lured into a plea agreement not reflecting TRUE circumstances of what led Tim into this entrapped situation rises in my book to the level of malicious & illegal malpractice of law.
These are not innocent "mistakes" or innocent "misunderstandings". If these assertions in Mr. Lipschutze's letter were true, is it not part of his job & Advocacy before any Court in any of the United States to render counsel & assistance to rectify these deficits he has indicated instead of telling Tim he will lose & just resign himself to this sorry fate?
Commentary: Again I have interviewed Tim & know that if he did not properly complete this process it was not for lack of intelligence or desire to do so. It was because he was abruptly & summarily swept away into another prison in another State & ALL of his personal possessions were STOLEN from him by those holding him against his will.
Who bears the greater responsibility in this Case? The Prisoner or the Prisoners Rights Attorney assigned to Tim by the Court?
Who has the freedom & the means of CORRECTING this deficit at Law? The Prisoner or the Prisoners Rights Attorney assigned to him by the Court?
Who has more free time to correct them? The attorney with a job & a vehicle or the prisoner who can not get out of a cage?
Would this be the standard your director would consider professional in conduct were Tim her client? I am asking this as she is a peer in the Judicial branch of law, a Bar passed attorney? is there not an ethical charge here to keep the Lawyers who function lawfully above reproach in carrying out their duties at Law by regulating their own? As we do with our Boards of Nursing?
Question; I ask of you, of The Director & those I choose to cc this Case & letter to for a wider commentary & to urge more Public disclosure of the ways & means of adjudicating justice within Caledonia County & the State of Vermont.
One final note in our updated findings of yesterday's visit; Fern asked Tim if the inmates from Vermont had requested that Vermont Law books & statutes be made available to them in the Massacusetts facility. Tim responded that they had all been told that; once moved, Vermont Law books were supposed to be in the library before they arrived. To date those books are not in the library.
I sincerely request both of your physical presences at the next calendared status Hearing scheduled for this case in matter in Caledonia Superior Civil Court on December 6, 2010, 10 am.
Sincerely, Monica King, Esq. (ret) Justice of the Peace, New Hampshire
ACTUAL CONTENT of Mr. Lipshutz'es letter to his assigned client:
Timothy Duranleau
Franklin Cty. House of Corrections
CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL MAIL
160 Elm Street
Greenfield, MA 01301
Re: Duranleau v. Pallito
Docket No. 166-6-10Cacv NOVEMBER 3, 2010
Dear Mr. Duranleau:
I have completed my review of your case. Unfortunately, I do not have good news for you.
First of all, the furlough statute gives DOC complete discretion to set furlough conditions. This includes residence. So, you cannot win this case. Second of all, you did not finish the grievance procedure all the way through. That is an independent reason why you cannot win this case.
I am sorry about the bad news. I suggest that I dismiss this case for you. Your best bet would be to start seriously working on release in Washington County.
I will dismiss this case for you unless I receive a letter from you by November 24, 2010. Otherwise I will file a motion to withdraw & you will have to represent yourself.
Sincerely, Seth Lipschutz
Prisoners Rights Office
What Mr. Lipschutz FAILS to mention is the FACT that 3 separate Motions Tim drafted, printed & sent via usps mails from Greenfield, MA to St. Johnsbury, VT to ask for a PHYSICAL appearance in this Court went missing between these two New England States.
cc Interpol
Print
Email
