Why The government Still Scares Homeschoolers

Bill Haymin
By Lee Duigon

October 30, 2006

A government official has shouldered the blame for a brief scare among the homeschool community.

Rod Helder, director of the Division of Non-Public Education, allowed his office to send out a letter to homeschooling parents telling them to report to a police station, with their children, for a "review" of their work.

"I have to take the blame for what happened here," Helder said. "We have to hold these reviews at places where we can meet at no charge. Usually it's a library, a church, or a local government office."

The choice, this year, of a police substation in a strip mall, he admitted, was a public relations disaster.

"I understand people's feelings," he said. "I can see the headlines now — ‘Homeschool Moms Summoned to Police HQ.' I should've foreseen what would happen, and I apologize for it."

As Helder made ready to go on vacation, angry and confused phone calls flooded his office. He ordered the original letter discontinued, changed the meeting place to a library, and sent out new letters.

Peace Restored

North Carolinians for Home Education (NCHE) acted quickly in response to the original letter, advising homeschool families not to go to the meetings. In addition to the choice of the police station, NCHE objected to the letter's request that parents bring their children to the meetings, something not required by statute.

For the time being, at least, NCHE has withdrawn its objections to the meetings.

"The Director of DNPE has heard and responded to the concerns of homeschoolers," says the NCHE's most recent email on the subject. "He has agreed that having these VOLUNTARY meetings at a police station is not a good idea and that … no future meetings will be planned at police stations. He also agrees that since these meetings are voluntary, the presence of students is entirely OPTIONAL … Remember, your participation in these meetings is a voluntary decision that each family will need to make for themselves."

Earlier NCHE emails took a different tone.

"While homeschoolers have enjoyed a peaceful regulatory environment under Mr. Helder's administration," says one email to members, "these meetings exceed the legal requirements on several points, and NCHE strongly recommends against participating.

"As the DNPE letter acknowledges, these meetings are not required by law, and you cannot be penalized for choosing not to attend."

The record review meetings are voluntary, Helder said; the division has been holding them for 20 years, "and nobody's ever complained before."

The purpose of the meetings, procedures, and other details are fully described in the FAQ section of the division's website (http://www.ncdnpe.org/hhh114xx.htm). Participants are selected at random, Helder said. If they decline, the division has the statutory authority to visit them at home. Homeschooling parents must provide their children's scores on standardized achievement tests (parents select which tests to use); and attendance records, lesson plans, textbook lists, and logbooks may be voluntarily displayed.

The Real Story

The flap over the record review meetings draws attention to much more important issues.

"When we started this review program some 20 years ago," Helder said, "we had about 350 homeschooling families in North Carolina. Today we have almost 35,000. This old method is no longer adequate."

There is no way the division can review all 35,000 families, he said. Households in their first year of homeschooling, therefore, are exempt from review.


While the number of homeschooling families increased a hundredfold, the division's staff grew from four full-time employees to … five.

"It's all we can do just to answer people's phone calls," Helder said. "So many people have so many questions about what the state laws require them to do — just routine questions, but we can't keep up. We do try to provide all the relevant information on our website."

In addition to being responsible for supervising home education, the division staff must also visit every private school in the state at least once a year.

"Ours is one of the few states where homeschoolers do not answer to the public schools or any other school establishment," Helder said. "This division is operated by the governor's office, not the State Board of Education."

But the state should not be supervising home education at all. The Bible teaches clearly that the schooling of children is the responsibility of their parents, not the state. Furthermore, any involvement of the state in education is extra-constitutional. Neither "education" nor "schooling" are mentioned even once in the U.S. Constitution.

The problem is that the American people, over the span of 150 years, have grown accustomed to the government taking charge of education. The great majority no longer question it — although the dramatic growth of the homeschooling movement shows that more and more citizens are questioning it, and voting with their feet.

As long as the government has any involvement in homeschooling, which is an abuse in itself, there is the potential for greater abuse, on a grand scale.

In Germany, for instance, the government has decided to enforce a Nazi-era law banning homeschooling altogether. The European Human Rights Court has upheld this law (see http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/oct/06101303.html), and several German fathers have been jailed.

American homeschooling families are aware of this. Is it any wonder NCHE reacted so strongly when parents were "invited" to report to a police station with their children?

It's good that North Carolina does not require its homeschooling families to answer to the public school establishment; but it's not quite good enough.

Originally the strength of American civilization was not the state, but the family. Statist "educators" have spent more than a century trying to undo this. As R. J. Rushdoony writes, "The concept of ‘democratic' or statist education has waged war, not only against the Christian faith, but against the family as well … The ‘public' or statist schools, which began their history as a subversive movement aimed at subverting the old order, now cast the implication of subversion on the family!"[1]

We commend NCHE for its vigilance, and Mr. Helder for his willingness to admit his division made a mistake. But the original "mistake" is to have the government involved in education in the first place.

We look forward to the day when homeschooling comprises enough votes to cast off unconstitutional government "supervision" altogether.

1] R. J. Rushdoony, The Nature of the American System, (Vallecito, CA: Ross House Books, 1965, 2001 edition), 26–27.

Lee Duigon is a Christian free-lance writer and contributing editor for the Chalcedon Report. He has been a newspaper editor and reporter and a published novelist.

Copyright 2005 The Chalcedon Foundation www.chalcedon.edu

By Bill Haymin, 2006
Print Email
Bookmark and Share

Bill Haymin

Because of Bill's increasing concerns about the serious, sobering and perilous times we are living and being manipulated into, his intentions will be mainly devoted (as he has been) to posting articles that will alert, inform, expose, and wake up a sleeping reading public. This involves the issues that are not covered, or not covered truthfully by the "National News Media." "In the time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell.

To warn the public of the present and coming danger of permitting the federalizing of local police departments across our nation is of the utmost importance, if allowed to continue it will result in the planned replication of the infamous "Nazi storm troopers" reminiscent of Hitler´s Germany in recent past history.

Also of grave concern is the agenda of "Sustainable Development."

"It is the official policy of every state government, and nearly every city, town and county in the nation. But, I warn you, accepting the perception that Sustainable Development is simply good environmental stewardship is a serious and dangerous mistake…
Sustainable Development is the process by which America is being reorganized around a central principle of state collectivism using the environment as bait...

…Sustainable Development calls for changing the very infrastructure of the nation, away from private ownership and control of property to nothing short of central planning of the entire economy…
…The Sustainablists insist that society be transformed into feudal-like governance by making nature the central organizing principle for our economy and society"…

Feudalism is the power over slaves.

…"According to Sustainablist doctrine, it is a social injustice for some to have prosperity if others do not. It is a social injustice to keep our borders closed. It is a social injustice for some to be bosses and others to be merely workers.

Social justice is a major premise of Sustainable Development: Another word for social justice, by the way, is Socialism. Karl Marx was the first to coin the phrase "social justice." Some officials try to pretend that Sustainable Development is just a local effort to protect the environment -- just your local leaders putting together a local vision for the community. Then ask your local officials how it is possible that the exact language and tactics for implementation of Sustainable Development are being used in nearly every city around the globe from Lewiston, Maine to Singapore. Local indeed…" Tom DeWeese www.americanpolicy.org

…"Are you starting to see the pattern behind Cap and Trade, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and all of those commercials you´re forced to watch about the righteousness of Going Green? They are all part of the enforcement of Sustainable Development…" Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the UN´s Rio Earth Summit in 1992

"…The politically based environmental movement provides Sustainablists camouflage as they work to transform the American systems of government, justice, and economics. It is a masterful mixture of socialism (with its top down control of the tools of the economy) and fascism (where property is owned in name only – with no control). Sustainable Development is the worst of both the left and the right. It is not liberal, nor is it conservative. It is a new kind of tyranny that, if not stopped, will surely lead us to a new Dark Ages of pain and misery yet unknown to mankind." Tom DeWeese

"A prudent person foresees the danger ahead and takes precautions; the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs. 22:3 N.L.T