Fake Sudan (Real Ethiopia) and Fake Ethiopia (Real Abyssinia): what is at stake?
Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
February 16, 2010
I then referred to central Sudan´s populations, the inhabitants of the vast area where are located the country´s main cities, namely Khartoum, Shendi, Gedaref, Malakal, Kosti, and Wad Madani. I said: "Today´s Sudan´s Arabic-speaking, Kushitic populations must be finally taught their true, national history, instead of the colonial falsehood that is still being taught in the universities of the otherwise "anti-Western" Sudan".
And I concluded that "finally, the country will have to be renamed "Ethiopia" to correctly reflect the true, historical usage of the term given by the Ancient Greeks and Romans to the country south of Egypt., and to the great Kushitic / Meroitic state that left so many great monuments on the soil of today´s de-personified and fake Sudan".
Following the publication of the article, I received many letters from readers asking more details about my suggestion and the reasons for which I demand the official renaming of the two troublesome and tyrannical countries that proved to be a cemetery of many peoples. In the present article, I will explain why the correct name of a country is critical for modern nation building, and focus on the Sudan / Ethiopia and Abyssinia / Fake Ethiopia predicaments.
The Evil Constituent Elements of the European Colonialism and its Rise
It all has to do with the phenomenon of European colonialism that proved to be the African continent´s most calamitous period of history. It is essential to bear in mind that before the French Revolution, the idea of nation – as perceived, formulated and diffused by the so-called Enlightenment philosophers – simply did not exist.
Certainly words like natio in Latin and ethnos in Ancient Greek existed in all the ancient languages. However, the use of the aforementioned two words in modern languages should not lead us to confusion because the present connotation simply did not exist in the Antiquity.
In brief, what we call "nation" today did not exist as connotation in any language during the Antiquity and the Islamic Ages. Had the modern, widely diffused, connotation of the word ´nation´ been presented to erudite scholars, priests and philosophers of past times, they would have all rejected it as a paranoiac invention and a perilous fantasy. For the ancient peoples, what we call "nation" is an illusory and fake concept.
The subject is certainly vast but here I mention it only to refer to an early stage of European colonialism in Asia and Africa, namely that of the diffusion of many false concepts.
The Euro-cannibals
False concepts, ideological and theoretical confusion, treachery, corruption, inducement into high treason, and comprehensive conspiracy against the colonized peoples are all constituent parts and fundamental pillars of the European colonialism. To understand why all these evildoings have been perpetrated worldwide by the Euro-cannibals, one must see the map of the world in three dates: 1490, 1785 and 1920.
Before 520 years, there was still an Islamic state in Spain, there were still great indigenous kingdoms in America, and the Islamic world was ruled by many local authorities and kings, spanning from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Africa was constituted in a myriad of rather modest states, whereas China was living with the fresh memory of Emperor Yongle´s expansion up to the easternmost confines of Central Asia. Russia was an insignificant realm that had just managed to deter the Great Horde, and Western Europe was a multi-divided, poor, barbaric and uncivil circumference in turmoil.
Before 225 years, America was occupied by and divided among five European colonial powers (Spain, Portugal, France, England, and Holland), after terrible genocides had taken place due to the forced Christianization of many subjugated indigenous peoples. The then recent formation of the US was viewed by the Founding Fathers as key to the elimination of the colonial scourge from the Western Hemisphere. The Islamic world was mainly under the control of three huge kingdoms, namely the Ottoman Empire (Islamic Caliphate), Safavid Iran, and Mughal India, although the latter had started being disintegrated due to the English – promoted Maratha Hindu kingdom and the increasing colonial presence of the English and the French. Islamic – Ottoman control over North Africa was still firm, and only in Africa´s coastal lands, European colonial presence was attested. Qing (Manchu) China was on the eve of the Messianic White Lotus rebellion that weakened the Manchu rule. Russia had risen to a significant European power due to the expansion in Siberia, the Far East, and more importantly, in the South (the Black Sea and the Caucasus region), although Central Asiatic Islamic states were still independent. Contrarily to almost the rest of the world, Europe was significantly stronger and wealthier due to the exploitation of the natural resources of the colonized territories, mainly in America and secondarily in India.
But in 1920, the colonization project had been completed with
a) the military and diplomatic defeat of the Ottoman Empire,
b) the demise of the last Iranian imperial regime (the Qajar dynasty),
c) the dissolution of Imperial China,
d) the elimination of any independent authority in India and Africa, and – more importantly –
e) the substitution of the former anti-colonial US establishment with a set of puppets of the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge and its latest dependency, the Zionist club.
Over the past 90 years, colonial Europe (England, France, Holland and Belgium) and their Anti-American dependency at Washington ruled the world in an inhuman, totalitarian and criminal way, storing stolen wealth in their financial institutions and plunging the rest of the world into the worst crisis that has ever existed in the History of the Mankind.
Fake Name and Fake Identity Projected on Subjugated, Colonized Peoples
The comparison is detrimental and this is the reason the world mass media have done their best to keep it unnoticeable and hidden. As the prevailing colonial (or rather postcolonial) situation is critical for the colonial powers´ grip on the rest of the world, the colonial academia devised several means and methods by which they would perpetuate this situation.
Expecting to face immediate political reaction (as they did), they invented a mechanism solid enough and difficult to detect that they subsequently implemented. The mechanism was geared to ensure the permanent cancellation of all the subjugated peoples´ perspective of real independence and genuine sovereignty.
The mechanism involves four layers:
a. the elaboration of an interpretative system that totally disfigures historical reality to perfectly adjust it to the global supremacy needs of the colonial powers
This system consists in a false reconstitution of the historical past of every people, a fallacious comparison and interpretation of the historical interactions among all the peoples, and a meticulous and systematic study focus misplacement. All disciplines of the Humanities are involved, as falsehood covers fields as diverse as History, Philology, Philosophy, Art History, History of Religions, Social Anthropology, Ethnography, Linguistics, Archeology, etc. This system has been perpetuated from generation to generation due to the authoritarian nature of the academic institutions, the existing totalitarian control of the interpretative ideas and proposals, and the Freemasonic grip on the colonial countries´ academic institutions.
b. the attraction / invitation of foreign students originating from colonized countries and subjugated peoples
This takes many forms, involving scholarships, promotions, and every type of corrupt method that helps detach young students and / or research fellows from the traditional educational system of their people, and gradually turn them to colonial puppy dogs totally unable to critically think and utterly reject the colonial theoretical elaboration that truly damages their own people´s historical identity, cultural integrity, and traditional education.
Apart from the financial aspect of the corruption, there is a vast level of emotional and psychological corruption involved. Historical lies, earlier composed by the villainous Freemasonic academia, take the form of fake patriotism´s stimuli when shamelessly "taught" as academic truth. This makes of the foreign student a "bon pour l´ Orient" fabricated in the West and then exported to the student´s country.
These ´students´ undergo also a process of psychological corruption because they are induced to believe that their career will be successful if they go back home to further diffuse the lies learnt in Western Europe as historical truth.
This evil orchestration gets the credit of the technological advance of the Western European countries and makes the various African, American, Asiatic and European students assume that the successes of the European academia in physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics, astronomy, and engineering can be possibly be a guarantee for the authenticity and the truth of the Western academia´s disciplines of Humanities.
c. the projection of the whole system onto the colonized countries
This is not limited in the acclaimed return of the former ´students abroad´! It takes the form of foreign language institutes, cultural associations, several depts. of the colonial embassies (notably press, cultural), and an orchestration of corrupt methods, involving bribery of local mass media, politicians, academia, and public administration heads.
As it happens with the attraction of foreign students in the Western universities, it can also involve multiple levels of corruption, such as emotional, psychological, institutional and other. It can end up with unnoticed and unperceived high treason, thus damaging the real interests of the targeted people in an irreversible way. The imposition of a fake name and false identity constitute in this regard some of the most irreversible damages that can be caused to a targeted people.
d. the prevalence of cultural, religious, educational, academic, and intellectual dissociation and disconnection among the all the targeted peoples worldwide
This means direct ignorance of the "other", which in turn allows the colonial powers to leverage their interests accordingly. When there is not a single Dept. of Somali Studies in Venezuela, when there is not a single specialist on Nilo-Saharan cultures and languages in Iran, when there is no Dept. of Assyriology in Mexico, when there is not a single specialist on Pre-Columbian civilizations in Sudan, and when there is no Dept. of Manichaeism in Tunisia, we can be sure that the colonial academic scheme will last much and damage subjugated peoples and misled administrations even further.
This situation constitutes a supreme tool of the colonial powers´ policy making process because mutual understanding, knowledge of the "other", interconnection and direct exchange of knowledge (without the need to use an "international" language and refer to bibliography written by European scholars for the interests) can prevent the colonial scheme by promoting challenging viewpoints and pertinent refutations of the Anglo-French Freemasonic fallacy that has been so systematically diffused worldwide.
As a matter of fact, this point is critical for the perpetuation of the role of "academic" center that so malignantly has been played by London, Oxford, Cambridge, Paris, Amsterdam, etc.
This situation, if properly studied, helps shape a very different perception of our world. This is actually the key to understanding the historical developments that took place in East Africa over the past 250 years.
Fake names and fake identities
The projection of fake name and false identity did not occur in Eastern Africa only. Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco are fake names indeed. Libya as name was totally unused by any inhabitant of that area before 100 years. Iraq is a false name too; it should be called Aram Nahrin (Mesopotamia).
Similarly, Greece is a fake name for either the Greek speaking Eastern Romans (who used to identify themselves as Romioi) or for the Albanian, Slavic, and Vlachian speaking peoples of the South Balkans, who comically have been labeled by Anglo-French political agents and spies as "Greeks".
Furthermore, Lebanon is a fake name for the modern Phoenicians whose country could form a cohesive modern nation if the correct name (Phoenicia) was chosen in order to support the national historicity and the cultural integrity of the modern Phoenicians.
In addition, modern Iran is a fake because as appellation, it consists in the false use of an imperial name that was employed to denote many peoples (not "nations") for many historical periods during which the modern concept of "nation" did not exist. Either pre-Islamic or Islamic, Iran was a rightful cover name for Azerbaijan (Atropatene), Khwarezm (Chorasmia), Babylonia, Characene, Fars (Persia), etc. With the rise of the pseudo-Pahlavi dynasty and the transformation of the imperial state into a modern national kingdom, the name Iran was simply constrained to mean Fars, thus rendering all the other peoples secondary groups destined to cultural and national genocide.
The aforementioned is not an exhaustive list, and one could add many other fake constructions like Kenya, Mali, Pakistan, India, Yugoslavia, Turkey, France, etc.
Fake Sudan and Fake Ethiopia
The formation of the two fake states between Egypt and Somalia was effectuated through several phases of colonial conspiracy that can be easily retraced.
If we go back to 1798 when Napoleon invaded Egypt, we can find no local people using the term Sudan specifically for the territory of the modern state that was incepted in 1956. Bilad as Sudan was a vast geographical term in Arabic that helped denote the lands inhabited by Black people. Modern Mali´s territory was "Sudan" too. Similarly, the Ancient Greek and Latin name Aithiopia / Aethiopia was in total desuetude among the inhabitants of today´s Sudan which truly corresponds largely to what Ancient Greeks and Romans called Ethiopia.
If we refer to the territory of modern Abyssinia (fake ´Ethiopia´), we can safely claim that in 1798, it did not constitute one but many different states. They were inhabited by Kushitic (Oromos, Afars, Sidamas, Ogadeni Somalis and others), Nilo-Saharan (Anuak, Nuer, etc.) and Semitic (Amhara, Tigray) populations. The small Amhara – Tigray (Semitic) Abyssinian kingdom that over the span of almost a century invaded all the rest with the help of the Anglo-French was confined on only a small part of today´s Abyssinia´s territory in 1798. And it was identified as Abyssinian (Habasha) by all its inhabitants, neighbors and foreigners.
So tiny the Abyssinian kingdom was that it was smaller than the homonymous Ottoman province (Habasha) that consisted of territories of the modern states of Eritrea and Djibouti, and parts of the provinces Tigray and Afar of today´s Abyssinia!
Some of these insignificant Abyssinian kings may have used the title ´King of Ethiopia´, imitating the Axumite Abyssinian King Ezana who had attacked and momentarily occupied a small part of Ancient Ethiopia (in Sudan) ca. 1400 years earlier. But they were totally unrelated to Ezana in terms of religion, dynasty, ethnicity, and even language; and the Abyssinian king Ezana himself could not pretend that he was truly King of Ethiopia even at the moment he destroyed Meroe (the Ethiopian capital, nearby Bagrawiyah in today´s Sudan) because he was then in control of less than 20% of the Ethiopian territory.
All this was known to the European academia who meticulously scrutinized all the ancient Greek and Latin sources before embarking on their colonial expeditions, starting with Napoleon. The reconstitution of the (erroneously perceived by them) Antiquity was the pretext for their presence and offered them the necessary coverage of their anti-African attitude and their evil willingness to subdue and exploit all Africans.
Acting to re-establish a disappeared Antiquity at the detriment of the modern daily reality of so many peoples, the Anglo-French colonials committed an incommensurable genocide that not many Africans have duly noticed thus far. This is however a vast subject that totally escapes the present article´s scope.
Here I want to make only a hint. Since the name Libya was re-introduced out of the Anglo-French willingness to erase the modern African peoples´ real life and substitute it with their criminal fantasy, the same could have happened with the name Ethiopia.
In the same way the Anglo-French academia were well aware of the fact that the name of Libya could eventually be attributed the Cyrenaica (Barqah) and Tripolitania (Tarablus), they knew that the name of Ethiopia denoted for the Ancient Greeks and Romans the country south of Egypt, i.e. today´s Sudan.
After the Anglo-French advisors of the Albanian Ottoman soldier Muhammad Ali (initiated in the Freemasonic evilness by Napoleon himself) ordered him to declare independence from the Ottoman Empire (and in the process he became finally acknowledged as Viceroy, Khedive), they later advised him to attack Ottoman Sudan that was ruled by the Mameluk soldiers of the Sultan; this occurred in 1820. What ensued was a very confused situation in the area of today´s northern, eastern, western and central Sudan, which ended in 1865 when the decayed Ottoman Empire, in order to further focus on the Caucasus area (against Russia and Iran) and the Balkans (against Austria – Hungary, Russia and the colonial states created because of European interference), ceded its Red Sea territories to Egypt, which was however still considered as part of the Ottoman Empire, but directly ruled by the Viceroys (the descendants of Muhammad Ali), mere puppets of the French and the English.
For all these long decades, English and French moved calmly to Ethiopia (i. e. today´s Sudan) stealing the abundant Kushitic Ethiopian antiquities, excavating temples and pyramids, and instigating ethnic divisions. They could have easily demanded the Egyptian Viceroy to name his territories throughout the Sudan as Ethiopia, because they already knew that this would reflect the correct and pertinent use of the Ancient Greek and Latin name ´Ethiopia´. But they did not do so. The reason was simple; their plans was other and they wanted to fallaciously attribute this name to another country that has no right to bear it: Abyssinia.
Even after the rise and the fall of the famous Sudanese Islamic leader Muhammad Ahmad (rather known as Mahdi), and the 1892 re-conquest of Sudan by Lord Kitchener, the English could have named the country spanning from Wadi Halfa to Metemma (on the Abyssinian border) Ethiopia. Although Abyssinia was in chaos after Yohannes´s death and defeat in 1889, and despite an attempt of Amhara – Russian rapprochement undertaken by Sahle Mariam (a trash that was later named "Menelik" and pretended to the Abyssinian throne), the English did not name Sudan "Ethiopia". The reason is simple; this would have enabled a real nation building in modern Sudan and at the same time it would have become a hurdle to the very old Freemasonic plans providing for the formation of a pseudo-Christian state named Ethiopia that, spanning from the southern border of Egypt to the Indian Ocean, will function as venue for the evil person that Freemasonic messianic eschatology depicts as the Messiah and the Hebrew, Christian and Islamic apocalyptic traditions portray as the Antichrist.
I will further expand on the subject in a forthcoming article.
Note
Picture: Remains from Mussawarat as Sufra, one of Ethiopia´s greatest cities, in today´s Sudan, ca. 200 km northeastwards from Khartoum. From: http://www.alnilin.com/vb/showthread.php?t=43461&page=4
Print
Email
