Anti-Somalia, Anti-Ogaden Falsehood of Western Academia: Fabrication of Fake Ethiopian History

Most of the troubles attested in Eastern Africa are not due to the racist and barbaric elites of the Amhara and Tigray-ruled Abyssinia. By themselves, the rancorous, hatred-promoting, Monophysitic (Tewahedo) Abyssinians would never be able to expand their influence outside the small and arid land which is theirs, and which will be finally left to them.

Similarly, most of the plights occurred in the wider Horn of Africa region are not due to the colonial diplomats and military who repeatedly tormented the area, spreading death and facilitating genocides.

The main reason for the Hell, in which numerous Kushitic and Nilo-Saharan African nations find themselves engulfed, is the evil, fallacious literature that has been ceaselessly composed by Anglo-French academia and systematically diffused worldwide in a peremptory way in order to deceive all possible players.

Foe identification is the task no 1 for all the terrorized and tyrannized nations of Eastern Africa from Sudan´s Furis, Nuer, Dinka and Bejas to Abyssinia´s Afars, Oromos, Sidamas, and Ogadenis, and from Kenya´s Somalis, Oromos and Luos to the multi-divided Somalis.

What actually condemned all these nations to underdevelopment, tyranny, and even genocide is what stands at the origin of the European colonialism: a false perception of African History, a premeditated falsification of the historical past of many great African nations, and a systematic diffusion of the falsehood that the Anglo-French Freemasonic academia meticulously elaborated during the past two centuries.

Egyptology, Coptology, Islamology, African Studies, Kushitic Studies, Berberic Studies, and every other Orientalist discipline that has been developed with a focus on an African civilization is the result of a vicious and villainous will to superimpose Europe´s mediocre, poor and unauthentic past over the irreversible reality of six (6) millennia of great and genuine, inventive and unsurpassed Asiatic and African civilizations. Compared to them, the ancestors of today´s Europeans were low, ignorant, trashy, lewd, barbaric and cannibalistic.

Africans Programmed to Total Extinction

Worse than this, the falsification that has been methodically elaborated, systematically diffused worldwide (by means of many tricks), and tyrannically imposed on all Africans (by means of colonial rule) has another – definitely more inhuman – raison d'être: the production of socioeconomic, educational, cultural and political developments that will lead all the survivors of genuine African civilizations to total extinction.

False interpretation of the past could just be a researcher´s mistake, which is a possibility for every human. But dozens of thousands of lies involved in the fabrication of a pseudo-African History, geared only to eliminate all Africans by means of cultural, religious, socio-behavioural and even physical genocide, are not a coincidence, let alone a mistake. They are the elements of a fake reality that, projected on all Africans, becomes the means of the unnatural and cruel justification of today´s Africa´s troublesome situation.

The elaboration of the evil and inhuman Anti-African falsehood needs a 100-volumed encyclopedia to be enlisted, let alone commented. The interaction between Freemasonic Anglo-French academia and diplomacy brings the falsehood produced in institutes, universities, research centers and academia to the corridors of foreign ministries, embassies and decision making centers and lobbies.

Thence, the criminal Anti-African act is exported to the puppet regimes and the tyrants that the Anglo-French colonial power fittingly enthroned in the fallaciously divided continent. These gangster-like local elites, only to obtain the permission of further staying in power, do implement and enforce these lies, false concepts and anti-African interpretations of the African History at the local level; and this happens at the prejudice of all the indigenous nations that are thus menaced with ultimate extinction.

The falsehood diffusion process has been intensified with the involvement of mass media that generate tones of fallacious reports, analyses, and commentaries, thus totaling misleading either average Europeans and Americans or endangered Africans on the subject. Wikipedia represents only a more recent dimension of the intensified falsification of the African History. Every entry concerning African History, and Eastern African History more particularly, is full of falsifying data, innuendos, farfetched assumptions, and deliberate misinterpretations produced only to gear a most distorted version of "history". Truths are not said to leave therein enough space for lies.

False Contextualization of Events

In History, falsification takes very often the form of false contextualization of events; this means that, although the author mentions correctly an event that took place indeed, he misplaces it within a historical context that did not exist, and which is very difficult if not impossible for the average reader to detect, let alone refute.

Much of the falsification effort consists in skilful narratives, syntactical structures, and mere usage, involving attributive adjectives, resultative adjectives and the like – all correctly used in order to create a fake environment around the undisputed, but altered within its context, event. It takes strong skills in error analysis to detect this sort of falsification.

Of course, learned indigenous people with a background in the History of their nation are able to immediately identify the errors contained in a book or article about their past, but the Freemasonic colonial elite counts on the limited scope of these persons´ possible reaction.

In other words, an English historian or political scientist, who writes in order to falsify the History of Somalia, ´knows´ that the Somalis, who can easily demonstrate the fallacious nature of his text, have no access to mass media and publication houses allover the world to refute and discredit him.

They count on the fact that the inhuman tyranny imposed on almost all Africans nations reduces their life scope to mere survival, and thus they feel that their hands are free to further propagate their Anti-African falsehood.

In itself, their historical forgery´s political use that they intend to make is all that matters for them. Studying the history itself of the Orientalist disciplines helps discover how they maneuver politically the academic falsehood that they produce, and by projecting this situation into the future, one can anticipate further developments.

As the subject is vast, and the falsification effort was materialized in thousands of articles, entries and books, I intend to unveil the falsification contained in a single text, by progressively refuting all points of falsification.

This method serves as model for many young African scholars and students who want to counterattack and outmaneuver the Freemasonic Anglo-French conspiracy against Africa in its entirety.

I will therefore be publishing excerpts of a 20-page article about Somalia, criticizing the errors point by point. For this purpose, I selected the article "The Ogaden: A Microcosm of Global Conflict" by Ezekiel Rediker.

Ezekiel Rediker is a Senior at Taylor Allderdice High School in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where he wrote this paper for Mr. Paul Schaltenbrand´s U.S. History course in the 2003-2004 academic year. This article was selected by the Concord Review (http://www.tcr.org/tcr/essays.htm) for the Emerson Prize, so this means that in the United States, there are academic institutions (http://www.tcr.org/about.htm) that offer prizes and awards for the forgers, the falsifiers and the deceivers. For a country where people accepted with almost no protest that their monies be effectively stolen (in the form of trillion dollar level bailout) by the Wall Street plutocracy, this does not necessarily mean much. It does mean however much for the Ogadenis and the other Somalis because it demonstrates that they are all targeted for national annihilation and physical extinction.

I will therefore be progressively republishing excerpts, commenting, and refuting the fallacies contained in the said article. Latin numbers inserted in the text correspond to points of my commentary. Modern European numbers in the text corresponds to the author´s footnotes.

The Ogaden: A Microcosm of Global Conflict

By Ezekiel Rediker

The British author Salman Rushdie (I) once said: "To be Somali is to be a people united by one language and divided by maps."1 Rushdie was referring to the colonization of East Africa by European powers, a process that split the Somali people (II) and created enormous havoc in its wake. After the "Scramble for Africa", European nations did not respect ethnic and tribal boundaries as they created new states. (III) They divided the region inhabited by the large and geographically dispersed Somali tribe into Italian, British, and French protectorates. After Africa won its independence from Europe, borders were redrawn again. Four nations with significant Somali populations were created: Somalia, Ethiopia (IV), Kenya, and later Djibouti.

Yet independence did not create stability. Within a decade, Somalia´s dictator, (V) Siad Barre, an advocate of Somali pan-nationalism, (VI) attempted to unify the five regions that comprised "Greater Somalia." (VII) These included the two former British and Italian protectorates that formed the country of Somalia, the Northern Frontier Districts of Kenya, the former French Somaliland, which became the Republic of Djibouti, and the Ogaden and Haud regions of Ethiopia. Barre´s idea of Somali pan-nationalism eventually led to a major war over the Ogaden region with Ethiopia, intense Cold War rivalry between the Soviet Union and the United States, (VIII) and finally the collapse of Somalia. (IX) The Ogaden war not only helped to destroy Somalia, but had brutal repercussions in neighboring countries as well. To this day, guerilla warfare continues in the Ogaden region, (X) and the Somali Ethiopians (XI) of the region continue to suffer tremendously. (XII) The historic conflicts over the Ogaden are complex, involving longstanding ethnic rivalries, Asian and European imperialism, Cold War competition, and tribal nationalism. (XIII) The Ogaden is thus a microcosm of the many forces that have shaped the history of the African continent.

Commentary

(I) In the first line of his text, the author demonstrates his partial stance, helping every criticism, and infuriating any objective reader. Referring to the most loathed and most despised person among all the Muslims of the earth is a provocation against all the Somalis. As such, it discredits the author from the first moment. It is precisely the same with someone writing the History of Judaism and mentioning in the first line of his book Hitler´s views of the Jews.

Using terms and expressions about Somalia that have been aired by a renegade of Islam is an insult against the Muslim nation of the Somalis, and clearly demonstrates the premeditated nature of the entire undertaking. Knighted by the queen of England, Salman Rushdie merely added insult to infamy. The disastrous beginning heralds an ominous text.

(II) The term ´people´ is wrongly used here; whenever we refer to several historical periods (and the author covers the span of five – out of 35 – centuries of Somali History), we have to use the term ´nation´. ´People´ is the correct term when refer to present times or only to one historical period in the past. When we refer to the times of Caesar, we can use the term the ´Roman people´; if we refer to the Romans diachronically, we have to use the term the ´Roman nation´.

In this case, the author tries to deprive the Somalis of their great past that eclipses by far the meager and unimportant past of the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians who have become the tool of the evil colonial powers in Eastern Africa over the past two centuries. As such, and only because of this attempt, the author should be considered as an enemy of the Somali Nation and be dealt with accordingly, through denunciations and condemnations.

(III) The sentence may be correct, but it is said as if there are no moral consequences; yet, the evident repercussions of this evil Anglo-French Freemasonic plan involve more than a dozen of genocides perpetrated throughout Africa. Narrating this truth without any comment of moral content deprives the author from any humane character. It is as if writing the History of Modern Europe, an author states amongst other details that Hitler exterminated so many millions of people. It is unethical, and as such, evil. It sheds light on the rancorous personality of the author who writes only to deliberately falsify. This personality belongs exclusively to Freemasons.

(IV) The country´s name is Abyssinia. Using the false term ´Ethiopia´ means automatic contribution to, or support of, the multileveled and multifaceted genocides perpetrated by the Amhara and Tigray Ethiopianist gangsters. The term ´Ethiopia´ was used by the Ancient Greeks and Romans for the Kushitic state of Sudan; its modern use for the colonial state of Abyssinia consists in Crime against the Mankind. See: http://www.buzzle.com/articles/calling-abyssinia-as-ethiopia-part-of-the-oromo-ethiopian-genocide.html

(V) Improper use of a term that would be rejected by the majority of the Somalis. ´President Siad Barre´ is the correct term. It would be interesting to know whether the author would call Hassan II of Morocco a Butcher, and not a king. However, the use of this term merely adds perjury to falsehood.

(VI) Another false term; there has never been "Somali pan-nationalism", neither can it be. Such terms refer to an all-union of several peoples speaking similar languages; terms like Pan-Turkism, Pan-Turanism or Pan-Slavism are correct because they call for a union among Turks, Turkmen, Azeris, Uzbek and others (for the former two terms) or among Russians, Poles, Czechs, Serbs, Macedonians and others (for the latter term). But all the Somalis either in Ogaden or in Kenya and elsewhere speak the same language and are one nation.

And how should we call the criminal deeds of the English to illegally occupy Ireland and Scotland? Pan-Anglism?

Referring to the term: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-nationalism

(VII) The term ´Greater Somalia´ is a metaphor; what corresponds to this term, as land and population, consists in mere expression of the Somali Nation´s wish to unite and form one nationhood. The term is void of any chauvinistic and nationalistic contents because it describes territories inhabited exclusively by Somalis.

Except, the villainous desire of the heinous author is to promote the permanent division of the Somali Nation. Such a desire, coming from a person so far and so irrelevant of the African reality, can only be due to bribery or chicanery.

(VIII) This assumption is totally false; the US did not support Somalia against the Soviet and Cuban armies that defended the illegal interests of the Amhara and Tigray cannibals. There was no "intense Cold War rivalry" because of the war between Somalia and the USSR.

(IX) This is another lie; there is no relationship between the defeat of the Somali army (1978) and the collapse of the Siad Barre administration (1990). The only link between the two events is the permanent, evil predisposition of the Freemasonic regimes of the colonial states of England and France against the Somali Nation. But this goes back to the beginning of the colonial times in Eastern Africa.

(X) There is no guerilla in Ogaden; there is a national liberation struggle against the illegal Abyssinian occupation of Ogaden. This predates the Ogaden War and the liberation effort undertaken by President Siad Barre. The Somalis of Ogaden never accepted the criminal and paranoid transfer of colonial territory from England to Abyssinia that occurred in the late 40s and the early 50s.

(XI) There are no ´Somali Ethiopians´; the subjugated Somalis of Ogaden have nothing in common with Abyssinia. They deny the right of that country to either occupy Ogaden or be called ´Ethiopia´, and they passionately act to irreversibly split and ultimately demolish the Hell ´Ethiopia´.

(XII) How comical! The author criminally lies by saying a half truth; yes, the Ogadenis are suffering. But because of whom? This is what the unethical character of the writer cannot afford to confess. Ogadenis suffer – as testified by the devastating HRW Report – because of the inhuman methods of tyranny, mass extermination and genocide applied against them by the racist Amhara and Tigray Abyssinian rulers, and more specifically the Meles Zenawi regime.

(XIII) Tribal nationalism is an inexistent term. A tribe is part of a nation, so there cannot be such a term, because its two components are contradictory to one another.

In a forthcoming article, I will republish and refute further parts of Ezekiel Rediker´s falsification effort.