Divided We Fall

I recently attended the UFO Conference in Barcelona, and to be honest it left me feeling a little flat and deflated. The endless twittering and appreciative applause from the tin foil hat brigade, who made up some of the audience, drove me mostly to despair. I know those statements would seem odd to anyone reading this, knowing who I am and what I represent, but I am sick and tired of the same old re-hash of information, and the same old faces on the UFO circuit. One of the highlights of this event was Dr Steven Greer, a man who made the UFO subject fashionable again; his ground breaking Disclosure Press Conference laid the foundation for many UFO based websites, it also gave much needed hope to anyone pursuing full disclosure of the Extraterrestrial issue. Without Dr Greer´s input, this subject may have died years ago, or at the least would have faded back into the realm of the kooks, and knuckleheads. I had the privilege to meet Dr Greer several years ago, albeit briefly, and he is a remarkable man, his knowledge of this subject is immense, but more importantly, is his understanding of it. The recent interview he granted to Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy, (Project Camelot) has caused some considerable controversy within the disclosure community. Many people have emailed me asking my thoughts on this interview, and if I believe that Project Camelot could be a disinformation bandwagon, providing a platform for those who wish to confuse, and divert attention away from the real truth concerning Extraterrestrial visitation to our planet.

Firstly, I have never met Bill Ryan or Kerry Cassidy, so it would be unfair of me to comment on their individual personalities or motives regarding this issue. What I can give is an opinion on what I hear and observe and formulate an opinion from that. The interview in question was strained from the beginning, mainly because Project Camelot had posted a blog the night before disputing some comments Dr Greer had made in his presentation in which he stated that Extraterrestrials are not hostile. Project Camelot had called the idea insidious, resulting in a heated exchange on the intentions of the Extraterrestrials. From my perspective I have to agree with Dr Greer, I have studied this subject for many years, and I have never come across one verifiable account of aggression from any Visiting civilisation.

In contrast I have come across many instances of our aggression towards them, most notably the Los Angeles County UFO in 1942. This Extraterrestrial object triggered a massive anti-aircraft artillery barrage from the military; over 1,400 shells were fired at the craft, in full view of hundreds of thousands of residents, yet no aggressive response from the object was seen or reported. There were some casualties however, on the ground. At least 6 people died as a direct result of the Army's attack on the UFO, mostly from fallen shells and shrapnel which also caused considerable damage to property in the surrounding area. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Los_Angeles).

Then there is the abduction debate, some people have claimed to have been abducted and subsequently abused by certain celestial beings. There is evidence to support some of these claims, medical evidence, implants etc but that does not prove Extraterrestrials were behind the abduction; all it proves is that the abductees perceived them to be alien. It should be noted that virtually all of the lurid reports being palmed off on the public as examples of "alien misbehaviour" are actually secret psychological warfare operations by human rogue military-intelligence units. These renegade military-intelligence units kidnap civilians without legal authorization or justification. These units drug those they kidnap, (often experiencer´s). These renegades deliberately physically abuse, and even gang-rape the civilians they kidnap. These covert-operations military-intelligence units then use brainwashing techniques to make the civilians they kidnap forget about the military kidnapping, while the renegades hypnotically implant a false memory about the horrific experience as an alien abduction. (http://www.drboylan.com/milabs.html). See also Barry King (http://alien-disclosure-group.moonfruit.com/#/thevoice/4529667923).

Hard to believe I know, but what everyone must understand is that there has been a propaganda campaign going on since the 1950s possibly much earlier, concerning this issue. This has been perpetrated mostly by the secret Government, and the military industrial complex, who are the chief architects of the cover-up concerning the Extraterrestrial issue. President Eisenhower warned the American people of this powerful threat in his farewell address on 17 January 1961. (http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Eisenhower%27s_farewell_address) see also President John F Kennedy´s address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association on April 27, 1961 which touches on the subject also.(http://vodpod.com/watch/904665-president-john-f-kennedy-secret-society-speech-version-2).

The most compelling evidence I have that Extraterrestrials are not hostile, are my own personal experiences. I personally believe people like me who have had a genuine extraterrestrial experience are given a token; this token cannot be seen, touched or analyzed under a microscope, but it´s something that touches your heart. It very difficult to explain in words, but im confident that anyone who has had a similar genuine experience could maybe explain it better or perhaps know exactly what im trying to say.

Having said that, for anyone to state categorically and unequivocally that every Extraterrestrial in the Universe is non hostile is foolish, it´s impossible to tell. Dr Greer´s statement primarily was about the Extraterrestrial civilizations who have visited here, and I agree, they have shown no provable aggression. The only insidious comments I have heard in this affair were the comments made by Kerry when she frequently used the term invaders, that comment indicates a lack of understanding about the whole subject, and demonstrates a cynical and dangerous viewpoint. Dangerous in the sense that she has an audience who are no doubt greatly influenced by the media presented on her website, and influenced by her own personal commentary too. Attitudes like that do not help in the push for disclosure, they only stifle it.

The Project Camelot site is full of alleged whistleblowers, with various viewpoints, covering a variety of different topics. They have some excellent material on their site, but they also have some questionable material too. That´s why it´s imperative that you do your own research, and do not specifically rely on the viewpoint of others. Take it on board by all means, but do it objectively, and without abdicating your own thinking abilities. I personally do not believe Project Camelot is a disinformation site, I think they are two honest hearted individuals with strong view points, who like most of us, are searching for the truth. The only problem I have with sites like that is the information overload it provides. It caters for everyone, no matter what you believe. It´s basically an emporium of ear ticklers, eager to feed a hungry audience with things they want to hear, and in some cases outrageous dross and miss-direction.

The only thing I am interested in at present, is full disclosure of the Extraterrestrial issue, all other distractions are ignored. They are ignored, because I believe once we have gained disclosure on this issue then all the other pieces will fall into place. We also have to take one step at a time, firstly by putting aside our own egos and petty squabbles, and being humble enough to take a back seat when necessary. It´s imperative also, that we all get behind those who are taking the lead and gaining the ground, if not, we will become fragmented, then the very people who are covering this issue up will not only win the battle, but the war also.

So in closing I will leave you with this thought, "a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." John F. Kennedy