Turkey, the Islamic World, China and the Prevalence of the Asiatic Landmass
Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
September 22, 2008
I then examined China´s and Turkey´s common experience and historical evolution. I questioned the use of the long lasted US – Turkish ´friendship´ that turned out to be an ineffective alliance, an evident liability, and an insupportable burden for Turkey. I subsequently identified possible threats and challenges for China, and specified feasible targets for China´s leadership to set for themselves.
Before examining the scope of the unavoidable Chinese – Turkish partnership, I will expand on the current threats and challenges in front of which the Turkish people find themselves. I will then outline the necessary and feasible targets that the Turkish leaders must determine for themselves.
Turkey – Possible Threats
Similarly with China, Turkey perceives as threat the rekindled Russian militarism, interventionism and imperialism. The Turkish – Central Asiatic axis of Energy persistently opposes the Russian tendency to the South which tries to take the shape of a Russian – Iranian rapprochement.
Not because of its size but because of its use and manipulations by Russia, Armenia can become a future problem for Turkey; the Armenian irredentism is constantly fueled by France, and this is the quintessence of the deliberately perpetuated literature on the supposed ´Armenian Genocide´ – one of the most incredible conspiracies of the 20th century. An eventual combination of the French and the Russian efforts can create in the area between Caucasus and Mesopotamia problems of dire global consequences.
The deteriorated security conditions in Iraq, and more particularly in its northern part, represents a real threat for Turkey. It is wrong to call it ´Kurdish problem´ because there are various peoples involved (notably Aramaeans, Turkmen, etc.) and in addition, the fake term ´Kurds´ spreads confusion among the international public opinion as the so-called ´Kurdish´ populations do not consist in one nation but many. Most of them are unrelated to the ethno-religious group that the French secret services arm, train, financially support, and politically promote only to make of it the ruling class in a fake ´Kurdistan´ that – if materialized – will be a real Hell for all the others, those who are fallaciously called ´Kurds´ as well.
The radicalization of the masses in Syria, Jordan and Lebanon, combined with, direct or indirect, an escalated clash with Israel, and the eventual Iranian involvement represent sheer destabilization in Turkey´s southern border. Russia´s arms sales to Syria makes the issue even more critical for Turkey.
A far more dangerous, although well mystified, threat is due to the European Union. Turkey is more developed than most of the Balkans states and can therefore – following a certain process of adaptation to EU norms – become a fully accredited EU member state. This has also been declared as fundamental target of the Turkish secular establishment since the early 60s. With some millions of Gastarbeiter in Europe and several Turkish origin deputies in Germany´s federal and Land parliaments, Turkey would be easily and smoothly adapted in the EU. The presence of an Islamist government creates an awkward situation in the relationship, but there is more to it. Attested European practices and analysis of Turkey´s long term perspectives demonstrate that Turkey needs to stay out of the European Union and focalize on other parts of the world where Turkey´s interests call for immediate action and developments.
The main part of the problem is that the Anti-Turkish establishments of France and England continue their traditional Anti-Ottoman policies without even changing tactics. What they want is generally speaking the annihilation of Turkey; more particularly they attempt to
1. damage Turkey´s interests in Central Asia, Caucasus region and the Middle East
2. minimize Turkey´s international role and position, particularly in international bodies (permanent position in the reformed UN Security Council; Mediterranean Union; G-8 discussions to enlarge that body with other leading economies, without however Turkey but …. with Indonesia, as ´representative´ of the Islamic countries, despite the fact that Indonesia´s GDP is smaller than Turkey´s that corresponds to only 1/3 of the SE Asiatic country´s population)
3. divide Turkey into two countries with the secession of several Eastern provinces where an independent ´Kurdistan´ (with ca. 15 million people) will be formed in order to plunge most of the local populations (which are not Kurdish but other, and have been disfigured as ´Kurds´ by the Anglo-French Freemasonic Anti-Turkish propaganda) into a tyrannical regime that will be far more detrimental to them than Turkey has ever been.
4. deny Turkey´s natural right to self-defense and nuclear energy and weapons
5. accept an amputated Turkey of 60 million people in the EU under condition the economy is under European control and the military totally isolated from the society so that the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge be able to infiltrate, diffuse their aberration of evolutionism (an erratic and inhuman concept), distort the democratic character of the country, and turn it to a customary European Crypto-Masonic totalitarianism.
Turkey – Possible Challenges
In order, to outmaneuver the various Anti-Turkish schemes conceived and activated by the concerted Anglo-French diplomacy, and the part of the US establishment that is linked to Europe, Turkey cannot allow developments occur in the Middle East, the Caucasus region, and Central Asia without shaping them in a way drastically opposed to the Anglo-French plans.
Caucasus is by now Turkey´s greatest challenge. In this regard, it will be essential to form a strong alliance with Georgia and Azerbaijan. The schemes of Western diplomacies have to be finally revealed to the inexperienced and gullible president of Georgia. The futility of imposing or insisting on solutions that oppose fundamental rights must in this case be stressed. A successful policy is always based on principles and reflects moral values. With Russia exposed in the Chechnya Genocide, it was absolutely erroneous for Georgia to insist on exercising sovereignty on territories where non Georgians live, like the Southern Ossetians and the Abkhazians. It would rather be advisable to offer them independence first, and subsequently attract them through various projects of cooperation; this would be enough to disentangle them from Russia. Particularly the Abkhazians would prefer Turkey and Georgia to Russians - as allies, not despots.
Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan must form a triple alliance and a confederation, which will open the way for Turkish soldiers to be permanently stationed in Tbilissi and Baku. Failing to shape a drastic advance to the East, a Turkish Drang nach Osten, Turkey leaves priceless space to the Russians; and at the same time, by not taking an initiative, Turkey enables Russia to gain the upper hand in the area of Caucasus.
Turkey should view any further disintegration of Georgia as Turkish national loss; and every day Azerbaijan is separated from Turkey by fake and meaningless borderlines is a lost day.
The Caucasus challenge for Turkey is urgent because it is introductory to two other challenges, namely Iran and Central Asia.
Iran is by definition a challenge for Turkey; Iran cannot be allowed to become a nuclear power, and Iran cannot be left as it is, namely an extremist, kleptomaniac theocracy. And Iran, as long as it is not a federal and democratic country, cannot be allowed to exist within its present borders. Turkey and Azerbaijan must shape a common policy, coordinate and co-finance efforts to trigger series of revolts among Iran´s Azeris, Turks, Turkmen, Loris, and other oppressed ethno-religious groups.
Dissolution of Iran is the only answer to a nuclear Iran.
With systematic work, it can be a matter of just two (2) years, so oppressed and dissatisfied the various oppressed ethno-religious groups of Iran have been over the past three (3) decades. At the same time, Turkey should help the Baluchs in SE Iran achieve independence too, and form a first, partly and provisory, state of Baluchistan until Pakistan´s Baluchs manage to secede from Pakistan in their turn, and merge in a United Baluchistan that would control the geo-strategically important area of the Ormuz straits.
The Iran challenge for Turkey is urgent because it is introductory to an even greater challenge, namely Central Asia.
The Central Asia challenge is vital for Turkey; the confirmation of geographical continuity of the Confederation of the Turanic States from the Balkans to China will signal the ultimate imposition of the East – West Energy axis and the permanent separation of Russia from the South, the Persian Gulf, the Arabian Peninsula, Eastern Mediterranean, Red Sea, the Horn of Africa, and the Indian Ocean. Only this geo-strategic option can guarantee sufficient energy supplies to China, India and Europe, without involving blackmails and troubles.
Central Asia and Azerbaijan, acting a the Asiatic landmass main source of energy, will offer an effective counterweight to Russia´s domineering presence in the world´s energy markets, mostly through a series of pipelines from Central Asia to China, India, and through Turkey to Europe,.
Iraq consists in a minor challenge for Turkey; in fact, it is so, only as long as Iran exists as such within its present borders; and under current regime. It is critical for Turkey and China that Iraq remains always within a sphere of influence as specified under the terms of Qasr e Shirin Treaty (1639). But the easiest way to prevent the rise of Persian influence in Iraq (and more particularly in its southern part) is to dismantle the Iranian extremist, kleptomaniac theocracy.
The danger for Shia cooperation and concerted action on both sides of the southern part of the Iran – Iraq borderline is due to the removal of Saddam, the US military presence in Iraq, and the ensuing devious policies of colonial character. The immoral and inexcusable US policy practiced immediately after the demise of Saddam Hussein, namely to treat the victims and the rulers of the previous regime equally, avoiding any approach to Justice, Equity and Reparation, triggered the rapprochement of the otherwise rival Shia factions, those of Iraq and those of Iran.
Iraq is a challenge for Turkey, due to the evident cooperation of the Iraqi terrorists groups of Barzani and Talabani with the PKK under the auspices of the French secret services. In fact, Turkey should invade the northern part of Iraq as soon as possible to prevent the massacre of many ethno-religious groups at the hands of the aforementioned terrorists; and at any moment the Americans withdraw from Iraq, Turkey must make it cleat that Ankara does not recognize the fake independence of this Ottoman province, which was invaded by the British during WW I, and unreasonably and disastrously for the World Security separated from Turkey.
Finally, the Western involvement in Lebanon and the rise of pseudo-Islamic fanaticism and extremism in Lebanon, Syria and Jordan consists in a challenge for Turkey; the same concerns Saudi Arabia, the epicenter of darkness and odium. The cultivation of this sort of evil system perfectly corresponds to the messianic and eschatological plans of the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge, as it helps prepare further wars around Jerusalem with excessive collateral damages this time – which is precisely what China wants to avert in the wider Middle East. Turkey can protect the World Jewry and at the same time ensure long lasting peace by a single act: invading Damascus.
Turkey – Feasible Targets
Turkey is the main, historically authentic, offspring of the Oriental monarchies and the last of many successive states in the world´s most critical region, the Middle East. Through a chain of interlinked stages, Turkey – Ottoman Empire – Islamic Caliphate – Eastern Roman Empire – Roman Empire – Seleucid / Ptolemaic kingdoms – Alexander the Great – Achaemenidian Iran – Nabonid Babylonia – Sargonid Assyria – Neo-Assyrian Empire – Hittite Empire – Old Assyrian and Old Babylonian kingdoms – Neo-Sumerian kingdoms – Akkadian Empire, one can go back to the Dawn of the World Civilization in Ancient Sumer, in the Mesopotamian South at the end of the 4th millennium BCE.
Turkey, as Ottoman Empire, controlled an area of no less than ca. 5 million km2 until the late 1910s. It has not been clearly noticed and thoroughly understood that, among the WW I Central Allies (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire, Japan), the most gravely and the most iniquitously treated in the post-war treaties was the Ottoman Empire, which lost in the treaties much more than the territory it ceded during war. After all the related treaties were signed, the Ottoman empire was left with less than 10% of its territory before the WW I, something that was corrected to ca. 18% (Turkey´s present territory) only thanks to the commitment and the determination of Kemal Ataturk. Austria – Hungary was treated in almost the same way, but the leading force in the anti-Entente camp, Germany, lost only ca. 15% of its pre-WW I territory.
As the Anti-Turkish paroxysm and hysteria prevails today among the Anglo-French Freemasonic establishment, Turkey should perceive the targets of its perfidious enemies in historical terms, making a comparison between its present territory and the area the Sultan controlled until July 1798, when Napoleon started the onslaught´s first stage by disembarking in Egypt. As the vicious and racist, anti-Turkish attitude, so excellently highlighted in the late 19th century by the criminal English premier Gladstone, still prevails today, Turkey should realize that the only possible line of defense is overwhelming attack, and systematic destruction of every Anglo-French plan, project and policy. If this is not done, today´s Turkey will follow the fate of the Ottoman Empire.
Turkish occupation of Northern Iraq must take place suddenly and unexpectedly. In the Caucasus region, Turkey and Azerbaijan must merge as soon as possible, and the Confederation must immediately invite Georgia to join. Then, the exploitation of the Caspian Sea natural resources should be the main concern of Turkey, and its new partner China.
In fact, Turkey and China must set a plan of Asiatic Islamo-Chinese political, cultural, and economic cooperation which will be extended at the level of concerted military action and alliance. The basic targets at a preliminary level should be the following:
1. Containment of Russia in the north of the Silk Road territories of Turkey, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Gilan, Mazandaran, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia and China
2. Demise of the Iranian regime of kleptomaniac theocracy without American, European or Israeli involvement
3. Containment and disintegration of the root causes of the Islamic Terrorism
4. Departure of the American forces from Iraq, and their substitution by Turkish army
5. Prevention of a war between Syria and Israel
6. Departure of the UN – US led forces from Afghanistan
7. Formation of a Confederation Turkey – Georgia - Azerbaijan
8. Formation of a Pan – Turanian Economic Union
9. Definite Interruption of the Turkey – EU negotiations
10. Parallel Withdrawal of Turkey from NATO and adhesion to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization
11. Nuclear cooperation between Turkey and China
12. Exchange of naval bases between China and Turkey (Chinese fleet in Antalya and Turkish fleet in Shanghai)
More specifically on the vast scope of the Turkish – Islamic – Chinese Cordial Alliance in Asia, I will expand in a forthcoming article.
Note
Picture: Aramaeans from the area of today´s SE Turkey diffused the ´Luminous Religion´ (Nestorian Christianity) in China and wrote this stele´s text ca. 780, at His-an-fu. However, approximately 750 years later, their descendants were targeted by the Anglo-French colonial missionaries, who after blackmailing the Nestorian Christians, exposed them to the Ottoman authorities in order to create a permanent friction and grave collateral damage to both. The Aramaeans have been targeted by the Anglo-French colonials first; long before the Ottomans and the Chinese. Today, the Aramaeans, the Turks and the Chinese are again targets of the unrepentant Anglo-French colonials; it´s about time to react through concerted action of irreversible character.
Online editions of Prof. Dr. M. S. Megalommatis´ book on the "Turkish – Greek Relations and the Balkans" are available here:
http://community.webshots.com/user/turkeygreecemegalommatis (in Turkish) and http://community.webshots.com/user/greeceturkeymegalommatis (in Albanian)