TEXAS 5 conviction White House Criminal Cover Up, Butt shot with S&W JHP 40 caliber & still running.
Mark Lowry
April 03, 2007
• J. Edgar Hoover “'The individual is handicapped coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous, he cannot believe it exists.”
Mark W Lowry “Inability to believe in the unbelievable, imagine the unimaginable, and comprehend the incomprehensible; impoverishes the human soul; demoralizes the human spirit and condemns us to lesser lives of ignorance and slavery by evil people who distort human reality of perceptions, potentials and dreams to satisfy their greed and maintain control over us.”
Johnny Sutton’s aggressive prosecution of two Border Patrol Agents Ramos and Compean left a lot of questions regarding how in the world they could have ever been convicted without some level of collusion between the prosecutor and witnesses.
Multiple questions raised include, charges the officers said they were out to get some Mexicans that day proved to be a lie.
Sutton said Ramos and Compean never mentioned the drug smuggler had a gun in his hand before shooting. That assertion has also been proven incorrect.
Sutton said he would arrest the drug smuggler for more drug trafficking if he could but refused to when he had the chance.
Sutton said this was a west Texas jury that convicted them and they don’t take kindly to illegal drug smuggler’s and if there was any way they could have they would have not convicted Ramos and Compean. Three jurors signed affidavits petitioning the court for a new trial because they felt coerced into voting guilty when they thought the officers were innocent.
Sutton says he had no contact with or direction from the White House or Attorney General Gonzales regarding the case. It was his sole decision to prosecute the officers. Sutton has been on the Justice Department Advisory panel that reports to the Attorney general and President on policy issues of national importance since 2002. In March of 2006 Gonzales gave him the head job on the panel.
Sutton reportedly worked closely with the Attorney General and President regarding issues of national policy, cases and other topics in two day meetings, every month or so. It is very unlikely he would not have mentioned something as politically sensitive as prosecuting and jailing two Border Patrol agents without receiving the blessings of Gonzales and Bush Baby. He has been a long time Bush Baby personal friend and loyal supporter.
Involvement of the Mexican Consular office and their demands on the White House are not clear and also raise questions about credibility of the prosecution of this case.
Special Agent Sanchez, (who was an apparent friend of the drug smuggler) was involved in the investigative process and had custody of evidentiary material while in the company of the drug smuggler. This raises many questions of credibility of his statements.
All of those factors and many more make the prosecutorial case against Border Patrol Officers Ramos and Compean lack any credibility before the American public. But even without those widely recognized shortcomings there remains the question of the alleged actual shooting.
Sutton says there is no question because Ramos and Compean attorneys stipulated the bullet that wounded the drug smuggler came from Ramos’ weapon. They could not have possibly known if it did or did not come from Ramos’ weapon without valid ballistic investigation and verification.
Sworn affidavit testimony by Special Agent C.R. Sanchez the drug smuggler’s guardian agent, reported the following: “Ballistics testing confirms a government-issued weapon belonging to U.S. Border Patrol Agent Ignacio "Nacho" Ramos, a 96D Beretta .40 caliber automatic pistol, serial number BER067069M, fired a bullet (a .40 caliber Smith & Wesson jacketed hollow point) which hit the victim in the left buttocks while he was attempting to flee to Mexico.”
That S&W .40 caliber weapon is recognized as one of the more powerful calibers used by law enforcement to assure “one shot stops.” The weapon is widely used in law enforcement because when the shot is fired and hits its target the officer can depend on stopping the threat to them from the criminal even if hit in non lethal parts of the body. The higher powered weapons are referred to as “man stoppers.”
The affidavit did not elaborate on weight of the bullet or foot pounds of force of the issued bullets, but if it is standard issue and not a P+ round it still would have had more than enough power to disable the drug smuggler if hit. It is very unlikely he could have continued running down an embankment, across a river, up the other hill and jumped into a vehicle to make his escape.
The reported victim of the shooting received some preliminary medical treatment and did not have the bullet removed soon after the reported shooting. He was treated a full month later and had the bullet removed by American Army physicians.
A widely circulated photograph of the wound and reports from treating physicians all indicate the wound showed an entry point on the left side of the drug smuggler’ left thigh with reddened skin on the inside of his left thigh. They report the bullet trajectory then went through and lodged in his right groin or thigh. There was some bone contact and damage to the urethra.
The photograph provided by the media does not look like the wound was as serious as it should have been if a “jacketed hollow point” “man stopper, one shot stop” bullet had entered his leg. The entry point appears almost invisible and affect of hydro shock to the area of entry and beyond does not appear prominent in the photographs.
The .40 caliber S&W is a weapon that can be used to bring down a full grown buck deer, but it didn’t stop the drug smuggler.
Actual results of ballistic tests performed by Joseph J.J. Correa stated Correa “examined one fired copper-jacketed bullet”… Not a jacketed hollow point S&W 40 caliber as reported used by the officers but a “copper-jacketed” bullet. That would indicate it was a full metal jacketed bullet instead of a jacketed hollow point bullet he examined.
Differences in type if injury suffered by the drug smuggler could be the result of a bullet not designed to expand upon exiting the weapon and account for the smaller entry wound and lack of visible injury at the point of entry. The full metal jacketed bullet is designed for penetration and to cause less injury than a hollow point bullet that expands and can fragment upon impact.
However, even if those differences in the reports could be accounted for it appears unlikely they could explain statements by the examiner that indicated he could not say the “copper-jacketed” bullet came from Ramos’ weapon.
Correa said: “The copper-jacketed bullet was fired from a barrel having six lands and grooves inclined to the right. The manufacturer of the firearm that fired the copper-jacketed bullet is unknown, but could include commonly encountered models of .40 S&W caliber FN/Browning, Beretta, Heckler & Koch, and Ruger pistols.” http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53976
The examiner could not even determine the manufacturer of the firearm that could have fired the bullet he examined much less whether it came from Ramos’ weapon.
Bush Baby administration refuses to pardon illegally convicted border patrol officers, and refuses to release all evidentiary material and trial transcripts. It seems if he has nothing to hide he would not worry about the facts coming out.
George W Bush Baby and Alberto Gonzales new world order "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about." (Bush and Gonzales to Patriot Act critics).
This case needs a lot more information put out with facts demonstrating how in the world they could have come to the conclusion the drug smuggler was shot by a law enforcement officer’s weapon. It appears impossible for the facts to support conclusions drawn by Sutton. “AIN’T NO WAY JOSE.”
The White House Bushite Coup Criminal Coconspirators seem to be in the position of having a lot to be afraid of. We must fight for the rights of each and every one of the Texas 5 officers Sipe, Brugman, Ramos, Compean and now Hernandez. If one of us loses our liberty and doesn’t receive justice, none of us do.
Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas "The liberties of none are safe unless the liberties of all are protected."
Mark W Lowry “Inability to believe in the unbelievable, imagine the unimaginable, and comprehend the incomprehensible; impoverishes the human soul; demoralizes the human spirit and condemns us to lesser lives of ignorance and slavery by evil people who distort human reality of perceptions, potentials and dreams to satisfy their greed and maintain control over us.”
Johnny Sutton’s aggressive prosecution of two Border Patrol Agents Ramos and Compean left a lot of questions regarding how in the world they could have ever been convicted without some level of collusion between the prosecutor and witnesses.
Multiple questions raised include, charges the officers said they were out to get some Mexicans that day proved to be a lie.
Sutton said Ramos and Compean never mentioned the drug smuggler had a gun in his hand before shooting. That assertion has also been proven incorrect.
Sutton said he would arrest the drug smuggler for more drug trafficking if he could but refused to when he had the chance.
Sutton said this was a west Texas jury that convicted them and they don’t take kindly to illegal drug smuggler’s and if there was any way they could have they would have not convicted Ramos and Compean. Three jurors signed affidavits petitioning the court for a new trial because they felt coerced into voting guilty when they thought the officers were innocent.
Sutton says he had no contact with or direction from the White House or Attorney General Gonzales regarding the case. It was his sole decision to prosecute the officers. Sutton has been on the Justice Department Advisory panel that reports to the Attorney general and President on policy issues of national importance since 2002. In March of 2006 Gonzales gave him the head job on the panel.
Sutton reportedly worked closely with the Attorney General and President regarding issues of national policy, cases and other topics in two day meetings, every month or so. It is very unlikely he would not have mentioned something as politically sensitive as prosecuting and jailing two Border Patrol agents without receiving the blessings of Gonzales and Bush Baby. He has been a long time Bush Baby personal friend and loyal supporter.
Involvement of the Mexican Consular office and their demands on the White House are not clear and also raise questions about credibility of the prosecution of this case.
Special Agent Sanchez, (who was an apparent friend of the drug smuggler) was involved in the investigative process and had custody of evidentiary material while in the company of the drug smuggler. This raises many questions of credibility of his statements.
All of those factors and many more make the prosecutorial case against Border Patrol Officers Ramos and Compean lack any credibility before the American public. But even without those widely recognized shortcomings there remains the question of the alleged actual shooting.
Sutton says there is no question because Ramos and Compean attorneys stipulated the bullet that wounded the drug smuggler came from Ramos’ weapon. They could not have possibly known if it did or did not come from Ramos’ weapon without valid ballistic investigation and verification.
Sworn affidavit testimony by Special Agent C.R. Sanchez the drug smuggler’s guardian agent, reported the following: “Ballistics testing confirms a government-issued weapon belonging to U.S. Border Patrol Agent Ignacio "Nacho" Ramos, a 96D Beretta .40 caliber automatic pistol, serial number BER067069M, fired a bullet (a .40 caliber Smith & Wesson jacketed hollow point) which hit the victim in the left buttocks while he was attempting to flee to Mexico.”
That S&W .40 caliber weapon is recognized as one of the more powerful calibers used by law enforcement to assure “one shot stops.” The weapon is widely used in law enforcement because when the shot is fired and hits its target the officer can depend on stopping the threat to them from the criminal even if hit in non lethal parts of the body. The higher powered weapons are referred to as “man stoppers.”
The affidavit did not elaborate on weight of the bullet or foot pounds of force of the issued bullets, but if it is standard issue and not a P+ round it still would have had more than enough power to disable the drug smuggler if hit. It is very unlikely he could have continued running down an embankment, across a river, up the other hill and jumped into a vehicle to make his escape.
The reported victim of the shooting received some preliminary medical treatment and did not have the bullet removed soon after the reported shooting. He was treated a full month later and had the bullet removed by American Army physicians.
A widely circulated photograph of the wound and reports from treating physicians all indicate the wound showed an entry point on the left side of the drug smuggler’ left thigh with reddened skin on the inside of his left thigh. They report the bullet trajectory then went through and lodged in his right groin or thigh. There was some bone contact and damage to the urethra.
The photograph provided by the media does not look like the wound was as serious as it should have been if a “jacketed hollow point” “man stopper, one shot stop” bullet had entered his leg. The entry point appears almost invisible and affect of hydro shock to the area of entry and beyond does not appear prominent in the photographs.
The .40 caliber S&W is a weapon that can be used to bring down a full grown buck deer, but it didn’t stop the drug smuggler.
Actual results of ballistic tests performed by Joseph J.J. Correa stated Correa “examined one fired copper-jacketed bullet”… Not a jacketed hollow point S&W 40 caliber as reported used by the officers but a “copper-jacketed” bullet. That would indicate it was a full metal jacketed bullet instead of a jacketed hollow point bullet he examined.
Differences in type if injury suffered by the drug smuggler could be the result of a bullet not designed to expand upon exiting the weapon and account for the smaller entry wound and lack of visible injury at the point of entry. The full metal jacketed bullet is designed for penetration and to cause less injury than a hollow point bullet that expands and can fragment upon impact.
However, even if those differences in the reports could be accounted for it appears unlikely they could explain statements by the examiner that indicated he could not say the “copper-jacketed” bullet came from Ramos’ weapon.
Correa said: “The copper-jacketed bullet was fired from a barrel having six lands and grooves inclined to the right. The manufacturer of the firearm that fired the copper-jacketed bullet is unknown, but could include commonly encountered models of .40 S&W caliber FN/Browning, Beretta, Heckler & Koch, and Ruger pistols.” http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53976
The examiner could not even determine the manufacturer of the firearm that could have fired the bullet he examined much less whether it came from Ramos’ weapon.
Bush Baby administration refuses to pardon illegally convicted border patrol officers, and refuses to release all evidentiary material and trial transcripts. It seems if he has nothing to hide he would not worry about the facts coming out.
George W Bush Baby and Alberto Gonzales new world order "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about." (Bush and Gonzales to Patriot Act critics).
This case needs a lot more information put out with facts demonstrating how in the world they could have come to the conclusion the drug smuggler was shot by a law enforcement officer’s weapon. It appears impossible for the facts to support conclusions drawn by Sutton. “AIN’T NO WAY JOSE.”
The White House Bushite Coup Criminal Coconspirators seem to be in the position of having a lot to be afraid of. We must fight for the rights of each and every one of the Texas 5 officers Sipe, Brugman, Ramos, Compean and now Hernandez. If one of us loses our liberty and doesn’t receive justice, none of us do.
Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas "The liberties of none are safe unless the liberties of all are protected."