Peace in Sudan Means Irrevocable Destruction of Abyssinia, a.k.a Fake Ethiopia
Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
June 19, 2010
I emphasized the fact that the main ruling ethno-religious group of Sudan, the Arabic-speaking Sudanese, who are of Kushitic – Meroitic origin, were the main victims of the process, because colonial, anti-Sudanese concepts and machinations were introduced to Sudan through Egypt, when the latter was detached from the Ottoman Empire and put under indirect but genuine Anglo-French, Freemasonic, colonial control, only to confuse them, mislead them, and deprive them of the great chances that they had on the basis of undeniable historical realities.
As a matter of fact, the process through which Sudan´s Ottoman Muslim citizens became several, at times conflicting with one another, ethnic groups of the vast country totally escaped the mind and the control of Sudan´s indigenous populations, although it was launched against them, against their identity, and against their chances to either remain Ottoman Muslim citizens or become a fully emancipated modern nation, as per the existing European prototypes.
I made clear that without an earlier identification and rejection of the colonial fallacies diffused among the Sudanese elites, today´s Sudan cannot possibly escape the nefarious traps into which the Freemasonic elites of London, Paris and Washington have long planned to methodically conduct it.
I enumerated and analyzed several colonial fallacies diffused among the Sudanese establishment and worldwide as regards 18th - 19th Century Sudan (namely the concepts that Funj was an independent Islamic kingdom, and that the period 1821 – 1885 in Sudan can be called "Turkiyah" or Turkish Sudan).
I enumerated the main Anglo-French Colonial Plans for 19th Century Sudan; I examined what the possible options would be for an alternative Sudanese political authority, and made comparisons between the greatly different Anglo-French policies toward
1. Sudan (the only country to have full right to the historical name of Ethiopia) and
2. Abyssinia (the country that was incited by the Anglo-French to usurp the name of Ethiopia and unlawfully attribute it to itself).
I examined several practices and concepts introduced at the times of Egyptian rule over Sudan, namely the disregard of the historical heritage, the machinated separation of Islam as religion from the Islamic political authority, and the colonially-supported prevention of Sudan from either reinstating the Islamic political authority or building a modern nation.
I specified that the latter was achieved through the diffusion (from Egypt to Sudan) of the false debate "traditional values vs. modernization", which is a sterile impasse because the only possible result is the caricaturization of Islam as a backward, anachronistic and otherwise useless entity, theory, faith and system – which plays into the Freemasonic, colonial, Anglo-French game against Islam.
In support of the aforementioned, I examined several examples offered by 19th century Sudan, providing possible successful alternatives to Muhammad Ahmad´s rightful, national revolution against Sudan´s enemies. I denounced the fake historical version provided within Wikipedia in order to consolidate the lawless claims of the barbaric kingdom of Abyssinia, and its Freemasonic, colonial, Anglo-French masters.
I terminated stating that a modern nation building in Sudan pertains to
A genuine concern for all the ethno-religious groups,
A proper reassessment of identity and historical heritage, and
A resolute approach in order to bring forth a larger Kushitic confederation, by destroying the country favored for more than 150 years by Sudan´s vicious enemies and methodic destroyers.
In the present article, I will focus on these points.
1. Genuine Concern for all the Ethno-religious Groups
To achieve this, Sudan must get rid of all fallacies, fake advices and intentional lies that North American and West European colonialists spend billions of dollars on annual basis to diffuse.
It is essential for Sudan to break ties with the US, England and France, eliminate the presence of their nationals on Sudanese territory, involving humanitarian organizations that are in many cases substitutes of colonial countries´ secret services that generate more problems than those they eventually or theoretically come to solve.
2. Bolivia – The Only Model to Guarantee Nation Building in Sudan
There are countries with which Sudan must form a very strong bond for different purposes, namely economic development, exploration of natural resources, and international relations, but few countries can truly be of help for Sudan to treat the various ethno-religious groups of the country in an efficient manner, i.e. to help them emancipate and form integer modern nations while staying within Sudan.
Without being a sizeable country, Bolivia has done a remarkably good job in dealing with the rights of the indigenous peoples in terms of cultural integrity, historical identity, socio-behavioural uprightness, linguistic – literary promotion, educational development, and traditional values´ preservation.
The case study "Bolivia" is all that Sudan needs if equity, justice, freedom, socioeconomic development and nation building process are sought for all the ethno-religious groups of the country. No one could think of an Aymara or Quechua university before 20 years; they are by now a reality in Bolivia. Similar developments can take place in Sudan soon, if smart and intelligent solutions of the country´s chronic dysfunctions are truly sought after.
Sudan can cooperate with selected experts of the Evo Morales administration and implement the Bolivian model among the Nubians of the North, the Fur people of Darfur, the Beja and the Hadendo(w)a nations of the East, the Nuba of Kordofan, and all the ethno-religious groups of the South. The deep enmity and the perfidious animosity that the colonial powers display toward the widely popular Evo Morales administration must be noticed by Khartoum and considered as remarkable credentials.
3. Proper Reassessment of Identity and Historical Heritage
The Bolivian establishment´s interest for emancipation and socio-cultural and educational development of the indigenous nations can also help here. Today´s Sudanese sociopolitical establishment must identify Orientalism, and the modern colonial historiography as the country´s no 1 foe at the educational, intellectual, academic and political levels.
It is because of the Freemasonic Anglo-French Orientalists and Africanists that Sudan´s real name, Ethiopia, was lawlessly usurped by Sudan´s vicious enemy, the tiny kingdom of Abyssinia that expanded with Anglo-French colonial support and incorporated several Kushitic nations, the Oromos, the Hadiyas, the Kaffas, the Shekachos and the Sidamas who are the closest brotherly nations to the Arabic-speaking Kushites of modern Sudan´s central provinces.
The rejection of the Western falsification of Sudan´s History (a forgery that is instrumental for the colonial, Anti-Sudanese, Anti-African purposes of the Anglo-French and their Abyssinian stooges) is condition sine qua non for reinstating Sudan´s correct, determinant and central position in the History of Eastern Africa.
Afro-centrists from Ghana´s universities and from other African capitals are essential in this regard for Sudan in order to obliterate the pseudo-historical dogmas and fallacies that the Anglo-French developed and diffused as regards all the phases of Sudanese (i.e. Ethiopian) History, and in order to elaborate a true and comprehensive National History of all Eastern African Kushites whose real center today is Khartoum.
The identification of the historical term ´Ethiopia´ with Sudan, and not the illegal colonial state of Abyssinia, is the cornerstone of Sudan´s nation building, because it will help consolidate the country´s national integrity and at the same time, it will lead Sudan´s worst enemy to dissolution – thus bringing freedom and liberation to the brotherly Kushitic nations, notably the Oromos who have suffered a long lasting persecution and tyranny, having been subjugated to the Abyssinians since the last half of the 19th century.
4. Resolute Approach to a Khartoum-based Larger Kushitic Confederation
The national interests of Sudan, the geo-strategic position of Khartoum, the historical definition of Sudan´s central role in Eastern Africa, from Egypt´s southern border to Somalia, the identified intentions of the Western powers against Sudan, against other Kushitic nations, and against Islam in Eastern Africa, and the vicious anti-Sudanese policies of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia), Kenya and Uganda impose a total re-orientation of Khartoum´s East African policy.
The following data must be first taken into consideration.
A. South Sudan
Due to Khartoum´s inconsistent policies over the past fifty years, Sudan´s South became a place of multifaceted international and regional involvement. The colonial powers, through the numerous missionaries sent there, managed to proselytize the indigenous populations to various Christian denominations in great number. They did not give a damn for the faith, belief and "salvation" of these noble African nations that did not need to become Christian; the colonial powers viewed the Christianization of these Africans as a wonderful tool of dependence and manipulation. Judged in real Christian terms, this deed is an odious and evil sin and the perpetrators will face a merciless punishment. However, if we evaluate the process through the viewpoint of Sudan´s national interests, we will certainly conclude that it shows clearly how damaging for Sudan was the fake Pan-Arabism and Islamism of which I spoke in earlier articles.
Had the above suggested Bolivian example been followed, these populations, the Shilluk, the Dinka, the Nuer ad the other ethno-religious groups would have been developed as small African nations, preserving their traditions and identity, and forming consciously integral parts of Sudan.
By trying to arabize and Islamize them, Khartoum simply threw them to the embrace of Sudan´s most virulent enemies. This is a lesson that must be remembered every time an ethnic or regional issue is raised in Sudan.
Darfur was exactly a repetition of the disastrous South Sudan policy of Khartoum. Useless to add how much it damaged Sudan´s reputation.
Now, the South may secede, and Khartoum can truly do very little to prevent this development.
However, for every country, the loss of a territory does not only mean loss of population; the inauspicious development signifies loss of natural resources and, eventually, loss of geopolitical importance.
What can turn a mere loss of territory into a real national disaster are the geopolitical implications and the unpredictable side-effects.
If now the geopolitical implications are combined with the exploitation of local natural resources, the national disaster can take the form of total destruction.
B. The Nile Waters
The aforementioned leads us to the consideration of the ´Secession of South Sudan´ option. Before anything else, Khartoum must be fully aware of the hypocrisy, duplicity and mendacity performed by all concerned regional and international players as regards South Sudan.
The recently (14 May 2010) "signed" (by Uganda, Rwanda, Tanzania, Kenya and Abyssinia), unsubstantiated, worthless and invalid, agreement about the Nile waters is nothing that would make Khartoum worry, but it must be understood as revelation of the aforementioned hypocrisy, which in turn unveils an incredibly deep rancor, hatred and animosity against Sudan.
It is the viciously anti-Sudanese and anti-African regime of Abyssinia that prepared the plot named Nile Basin Initiative over the past eleven years. The creation of the incredible conspiracy was supported by all the colonial powers – and this is a sign that they have methodically acted against Sudan.
The Nile Basin Initiative is a forgery; most of the countries involved have absolutely no right on the Nile, and the great African river does not even cross their territories. This is well known to all, as it takes a mere geographical observation and map study.
The White and the United Nile cross the territories of Egypt, Sudan and Uganda. Tanzania is not involved; Congo is not involved; Burundi is not involved; Rwanda is not involved; and Kenya is not involved. Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) is partly involved not because of the White or the United Nile, but due to the Blue Nile.
In reality, all three rivers, the United Nile, the White Nile, and the Blue Nile cross the territories of four countries only, namely Egypt, Sudan, Uganda and Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia).
The plot systematized by the Anti-African, Semitic Abyssinian regime consists precisely in the use of the term ´basin" because this word involves adjacent territory, which of course is irrelevant to the river itself, and can be fittingly extended to any paranoid degree that would suit the interests of the evil, anti-African regime of Abyssinia – the lawless occupant of territories of more than ten different Kushitic, Nilo-Saharan and Bantu nations (Oromo, Sidama, Afar, Ogadeni Somali, Kaffa, Shekacho, Kambaata, Hadiya, Gedeo, Wolayita, Nuer, Berta, and Gumuz).
By illogically extending the term ´Nile basin´, one can possibly involve South Africa, Nigeria or even Morocco! The participation into this forgery was a dramatic diplomatic mistake for Khartoum because Sudan, rather than Egypt, is the main, central, focal Nile country.
The ridiculousness of the pseudo-international initiative pertains to the fact that five of the nine countries cannot build any Nile dam – to possibly benefit from the river´s waters – because, as I said, the Nile does not cross their territories. Consequently, they have no right to speak thereon. Worse, a great deal of political corruption is involved, because whenever these irrelevant countries express national opinions on the Nile waters issue, they do so in corrupt merchandizing, and exchanging mutual support, with the illegal state of Abyssinia which is formed because of invasions of the aforementioned nations´ territories.
The solution of the issue will be the subject of another series of articles, because Sudan and Egypt must denounce the comical Nile Basin Initiative as a bellicose machination geared to cause more wars in Africa than any other issue before the two countries must condition their relationship with the five irrelevant countries (namely Burundi, Congo, Kenya, Rwanda and Tanzania) on their further participation in the illegal scheme.
However, I herewith mention the subject only to contextualize the eventual secession of South Sudan whose tribal leaders are manipulated, through incessant bribery, and can therefore express any possible "opinion" to please their masters of today, and those of tomorrow, and so on; it is necessary not to take them as a political constancy. Their hypocrisy is nothing on which Khartoum can possibly found a local or regional policy, let alone a relationship.
C. An Abyssinian – Israeli Alliance Against Sudan and African Islam?
The manipulation of South Sudan against Khartoum, after the 2011 referendum and the possible secession, must be considered as certain. Voices calling for a fake name ´Nile Republic´ for Sudan´s South, if independent, must be taken very seriously.
They testify to the ongoing secretive machinations that tend to turn South Sudan directly against Khartoum, not to the profit of the indigenous peoples of course but to the benefit of Khartoum´s ulcerous enemy, Abyssinia (fake Ethiopia).
Others offer another interpretation, speaking of a secret deal between Abyssinia and Israel for military bases in South Sudan.
The cooperation between the ailing Zionist regime of Israel and the monstrous Abyssinian tyranny must be assumed as certain; the illegal use of the name of Ethiopia by the Semitic Abyssinians is greatly linked with this evil, Anti-Sudanese, Anti-African, and Anti-Islamic cooperation.
The racist Ethiopianist ideology, promoted by the Abyssinian tyrants, makes of fake Ethiopia the so-called "Lion of Judah" (historically they are totally unrelated).
This term augurs an Abyssinian – Zionist alliance of eschatological contextualization, when the supposed pseudo-Messiah of the Zionists and the Abyssinians is meant to appear, utilize the forged state "Ethiopia" against Islam, and attempt to destroy the Haramayn (Mecca and Medina), the Prophet´s tomb, the shrines, and the Kaaba.
What can Khartoum possibly do in the meantime to lessen or eliminate the possible negative repercussions of South Sudan´s secession?
D. Sudan Must Support the Liberation Struggle of the Bertas and the Oromos.
The only way for Sudan to avoid troubles with respect to the Nile waters is to destroy the generator of the troubles.
Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) must be destroyed, broken down to ten – fifteen pieces, and virtually annihilated, at all costs.
This is nothing colossal, gigantic or cyclopean.
It is simple, easy and fast done – it takes only brains, inquisitiveness, and determination.
Sudan has all it takes to irrevocably destroy Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) within a year or so.
There is not even need for a war between the two countries.
And there is no fear for international involvement against the effort to split Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) to ten – fifteen pieces, because the only way an international involvement would be manifested in this regard is in favour of Sudan´s natural allies, the subjugated and tyrannized nations of Abyssinia (fake Ethiopia), who must be duly empowered by Khartoum to revolt and demand their secession from the useless rubbish of "Ethiopia".
The present circumstances show that the correct moment for Khartoum to take action is now. The recent elections in the fake Ethiopian tyranny demonstrated the total lack of popular base for the current Tigray – Amhara regime. The legally accepted opposition was threatened to disappear from the electoral process, and the illegal opposition remained inactive and constrained either in the Asmara flats or in the Washington villas. Of all the subjugated and tyrannized nations of Abyssinia (fake Ethiopia), those who can be more efficiently mobilized by Khartoum are the Berta of the Benishangul province on the Sudanese borderline, and the Oromos whose province also borders with Sudan.
E. Afars, Sidamas and Ogadenis
Certainly, the Afars, the Sidamas and the Ogadenis are also numerous and can provide Sudan with dozens of thousands of rebels who, properly trained and equipped, would destroy the criminal state of fake Ethiopia, liberating parts of their illegally occupied territories.
The Ogadeni Somalis under the strong ONLF leadership have already liberated significant parts of Ogaden; the fact that, immediately after the farcical elections, Zenawi tried to bribe some old ONLF members (http://www.ogadentoday.com/news.php?readmore=1491) clearly shows how greatly efficient for the Ogadeni nation and how greatly dangerous for fake Ethiopia´s integrity the ONLF is.
But Ogaden, Afar Land, and Sidama Land are not located in geographically suitable place, being either far from the Sudanese border (Ogaden and Afar Land border with Somalia and Djibouti) or rather small as territory (Sidama Land).
In addition, the secession of Ogaden and / or Afar land may be a blow to fake Ethiopia´s territorial integrity, but the country could still survive afterwards, merely losing some territory - as it lost when Eritrea seceded.
The small nation of Berta has been divided because of the colonial involvement in the delineation of the borders between Anglo-Egyptian Sudan and Abyssinia, and part of them live on Sudanese territory; as the Berta are entirely Muslim, Khartoum´s help to the tyrannized, persecuted and slaughtered Berta of fake Ethiopia will only be a demonstration of Khartoum´s Islamic credentials.
F. Benishangul Liberation Movement and the Persecuted Berta Muslims
The Benishangul Liberation Movement has undertaken a great revolutionary effort under disproportionally adverse conditions and the Bertas´ struggle for liberation consists in one of the most glorious pages of African and Islamic History.
Their fight against the terrorist state of fake Ethiopia deserves great support from Khartoum as the territory of Benishngul offers Khartoum overwhelming control of the Blue Nile.
In this regard, it is extremely unfortunate and absolutely suicidal for Khartoum´s supposedly Islamist establishment to have delivered Berta liberation fighters to gangster Zenawi in exchange of insignificant presents (http://www.africanews.com/site/Sudan_hands_over_48_rebels_to_Ethiopia/list_messages/32350).
The explosive situation that threatens fake Ethiopia´s territorial integrity – which is what Khartoum´s interests precisely dictate – is reveled through recent reports in which (http://www.ethiopian-news.com/ethiopian-court-passes-capital-punishment-upon-convict/) Zenawi´s gangsters do everything they can to minimize the wholehearted participation of the persecuted Berta nation in the Benishangul Liberation Movement - which is so critical for Khartoum´s control of the Blue Nile.
G. Arm Oromos, Liberate Oromia, Control the Blue Nile! – Khartoum´s Choice
Finally, the Oromos constitute the largest among Abyssinia´s subjugated and tyrannized nations; Muslim in their majority, the Oromos have been persecuted in some cases for over 150 years because of their Islamic faith and their Kushitic identity which makes of them the real brethren of the Arabic-speaking Sudanese.
The Oromos and the Arabic-speaking Sudanese have common ethnic origin which goes back to Meroe (Bagrawiyah), Napata (Karima), and Kerma. The essence of the monotheistic version of the Ancient Kushitic – Meroitic religion was preserved within Waaqeffannaa, the Oromo religion, because their ancestors left Meroitic Ethiopia, Bagrawiyah, Naqa, Wad ben Naqa, Mussawarat as Sufra and the other great centers of the Ancient Sudanese (truly named Ethiopian) empire, after the attack led the Axumite Abyssinian king Ezana (ca. 350 CE), and emigrated to the South, alongside the Blue Nile which was then out of reach for the Axumite Abyssinians in order not to accept the Abyssinian Christian dogma.
The Arabic-speaking Sudanese represent the descendents of the Meroites and the Kushites who did not emigrate further to the South but remained in Sudan, formed (under Egyptian Coptic, not Axumite Abyssinian, influence) the Christian Ethiopian kingdoms of Makuria and Alodia, and then progressively accepted Islam, a religion that is greatly close to monotheistic and aniconic Waaqeffannaa.
What matters more at the political, geographical and geo-strategic levels is the central position of Oromia within the colonial empire of Abyssinia (fake Ethiopia).
Not only the Oromos constitute ca. 40% of the colonial jail "fake Ethiopia" but the geographical position of Oromia is such that in case of secession, fake Ethiopia falls entirely apart, and the South is totally separated from the provinces of Amhara and Tigray that are inhabited by the dictatorially ruling ethno-religious group (the pseudo-Christians Tewahedo Abyssinians who have no religious legitimacy, after they decided to separate from the Patriarchate of Alexandria).
If Oromia becomes independent, the South becomes independent too, and several small states can be formed there with the few Amhara and Tigray administrators duly and immediately evacuated.
The small states of the South (Sidama, Kaffa, Gedeo, Hadiya, Kambaata, Wolayita, Nuer) are all that Khartoum needs as small and militarily impotent neighbours of an independent South Sudan.
Furthermore, Oromia´s secession and independence will bring an irrevocable disaster to the heinous, racist, and Anti-Islamic Amhara and Tigray Tewahedo Abyssinians who rule fake Abyssinia.
Not only the control over Ogaden and Afar Land will be both, impossible and meaningless, but the expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Amhara and Tigray illegal settlers from Finfinne (the rightful, old and future capital city of Oromia which is falsely named Addis Ababa), will trigger an irreversible chaos among the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians – and the possibility of the Amhara and Tigray provinces to absorb the returning illegal settlers is minimal.
Khartoum must recall that, after Abyssinia´s expansion against the predominantly Muslim kingdom of Oromia, and after the occupation of Finfinne, the capital of the Abyssinian colonial empire was transferred there in 1892 (http://www.macalester.edu/courses/geog61/kshively/development.html), and the heinous prison ´Addis Ababa´ was launched only for one reason: because the victorious campaign of the Khalifah, Abdullahi Ibn Muhammad, and the Sudanese occupation of the Abyssinian capital of Gondar (1887) proved that the traditional Abyssinian capital was at the mercy of the victorious Sudanese army.
Gondar or Occupied Finfinne (a.k.a. Addis Ababa) and Abyssinia (fake Ethiopia) can be again at the mercy of Khartoum tomorrow, and this time with no Sudanese military involvement.
Logistics support, military training and 50000 guns with ammunition is all that Khartoum has to undertake within the next few months.
Independent Oromia and Benishangul will control most of the Blue Nile´s trajectory beyond the Sudanese borders, and the collapsed Amhara – Tigray state will have to ask independent Oromia´s and Benishangul´s permission before making further noise about the Nile waters. On this, I will further expand in a forthcoming article.
Note
Picture: With the most demanded split of fake Ethiopia, Sudan will have two new friendly neighbors Oromia (mauve) and Benishangul (dark blue) in control of most of Blue Nile´s trajectory beyond the Sudanese border. From:
http://wikitravel.org/upload/shared//thumb/4/47/Ethiopia_regions_map.png/400px-Ethiopia_regions_map.png