Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Here are two highly provocative, and very thoughtful, articles on the truth about the lies underlying vaccination. There are some pretty provocative ideas surfacing (or re-surfacing) about the fraudulent nature of virology, vaccine research and statistical wizardry (some call it criminal distortion and intentional lies) involved in supporting the vigorous claims for vaccine effectiveness. Epidemics occur in fully vaccinated populations, not in unvaccinated ones. Polio vaccination predisposes for the development of Polio which is not caused by a virus. It is a form of environmental illness caused by DDT, organophosphates and other types of Pesticides, says Janine Roberts.
Go here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=582) to read the full article with undeniable evidence and decide for yourself.
Peter Mansfield's article ties vaccines like Hepatitis B to intentionally disseminated HIV/AIDS and presents chronology and citations to substantiate this often repeated contention. For example, "In 1977, Dr. Robert Gallo and the top Soviet Scientists meet to discuss the proliferation of the 15,000 gallons of AIDS. They attach AIDS as complement to the Small pox vaccine for Africa, and the "experimental" hepatitis B vaccine for Manhattan. According to authors June Goodfield and Alan Cantwell, it is Batch #751 that was administered in New York to thousands of innocent people."
Click here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=583) to read the full article and decide for yourself.
Below is an excerpt of the first article:
Polio Caused by Pesticides, Not Virus
Polio "Disappearance" Only Statistical Medical Fraud: depopulation covert op via vaccines
This article deconstructs the politics around creating the so-called ´polio vaccine success´ which is still widely heralded as a success. However, any simple cursory analysis of its history and the effects of the vaccine show that it was a dismal failure and that any success was based on medical fraud of reclassification of expanded cases of polio (filed away under other diseases) to make it appear that polio "went away." The World Health Organization does this to the present, despite skyrocketing ´polio´ everywhere. Widely known by the researchers even at the time, this is the story of the cover-up of the century: within this cover up, can be traced the expansion of using knowingly contaminated vaccines for depopulation everywhere.
POLIO DISAPPEARANCE IDEA IS ONLY STATISCIAL MEDICAL RECLASSIFICATION FRAUD TO HIDE POLLUTION VECTORS AND PESTICIDE VECTORS THAT CAUSED IT. POLIO SYMPTOMS CAN BE MYCOPLASMA AS WELL.
POLIO DISAPPEARANCE IDEA IS ONLY A COVER FOR SPREADING KNOWINGLY CONTAMINATED VACCINES WORLDWIDE–FROM ONLY US/UK LABS THAT KNOWINGLY USED MONKEY VIRUS CONTAMINATED SUPPLIES, AND THROUGH THE UNITED NATIONS W.H.O (WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION). W.H.O. ´VACCINES´ TESTED IN INDIA IN 2003 WERE FOUND TO BE LACED WITH INFERTILITY AND STERILITY AGENTS.
Polio Special Parts 1-4:
PART 1: A shot in the dark
Janine Roberts
from the UK Magazine The Ecologist (2004)
POLIO DISAPPEARANCE IDEA IS ONLY STATISCIAL MEDICAL RECLASSIFICATION FRAUD TO HIDE POLLUTION VECTORS
Date Published: 01/05/2004
Author: Janine Roberts
Polio is a devastating disease; the preferred method for fighting it is vaccination. Yet there is a mass of historic evidence that suggests it is not caused by a virus but by industrial and agricultural pollution.
During the first half of the 20th century infantile paralysis surged like a bush fire, moving from place to place, afflicting large numbers of children, but only in the industrialized West.
Prior to these outbreaks it affected very few and was often called `palsy´.
In the 19th century scientists gave it the name `poliomyelitis´, referring to the inflammation of the grey nerves of the spinal column in cases of paralysis. Poisonous metals were suspected of causing this disease, particularly lead, arsenic and mercury. In 1824 the English scientist John Cooke stated: `The fumes of these metals or the receptance of them in solution into the stomach, often cause paralysis.´ (2)
In 1878 the link between palsy and toxins was strengthened when Alfred Vulpian found that dogs dosed with lead suffered the same damage in their motor-neurone cells as found in the human victims of infantile paralysis.(3) The Russian Popow discovered in 1883 that the same damage could be done with arsenic.(4) This should have sent shockwaves through the medical establishment as the arsenic-based pesticide Paris Green had been widely used since 1870 to stop Codling moth caterpillars ruining apple crops. But strangely it didn´t.
In 1892 Paris Green was replaced in Massachusetts by the more toxic pesticide lead arsenate. Two years later the first recorded epidemic of infantile paralysis struck in Massachusetts´ neighboring state of Vermont.
The outbreak was investigated by Dr Charles Caverly, who reported that it was probably caused by a toxin rather than a micro-organism. Caverly said: `It usually occurred in families of more than one child, and as no efforts were made at isolation it was very certain it was non-contagious.´ (5)
Lead arsenate rapidly became the principal pesticide used on fruit and berries throughout the industrial world. In 1907 calcium arsenate was introduced for use primarily on cotton crops and in cotton mills. A year later 69 healthy children suddenly fell paralytically ill in Massachusetts. They lived in a town with three cotton mills and in settlements downstream from those mills. Nearby there were also orchards on which lead arsenates were almost certainly in use. They were also living only a short distance downstream from the location of the Vermont outbreak.
A further epidemic in Massachusetts in 1908 caused enormous public concern, but, despite the evidence that exposure to toxins might have been responsible, the investigating health officials overlooked the newly introduced pesticides; they thought them essential to their war against viruses and bacteria - and to the financial health of the agricultural industry.
Thus, the children paralyzed in Massachusetts were not treated with toxin antidotes to see if these would benefit them.
Instead, parents were advised to keep their children clean while the scientists, distracted by the then brand new theory that all epidemics had to be caused by infectious germs, looked for the virus `responsible´.
In 1908 two scientists working in Austria, Karl Landsteiner and Erwin Popper, reported that they might have found an `invisible virus´ that had caused these epidemics. They had made their discovery, they claimed, after making a suspension in water of minced diseased spinal cord from a nine-year-old victim of infantile paralysis. They had tested this noxious suspension by injecting one or two cups of it directly into the brains of two monkeys. The monkeys fell severely ill (as might have been predicted). One died and the other had its legs paralyzed. The scientists then dissected the monkeys and found damage in their central nervous tissues similar to that found in human cases of infantile paralysis.(8)
Today the World Health Organization (WHO) still credits Landsteiner and Popper as having found the poliovirus with this experiment.
Why it does so is inexplicable.
The fluid they injected must have contained much human cellular debris, any toxins involved in the child´s illness, and probably several kinds of viruses. So, it was no wonder the monkeys fell so desperately ill. Such a soup could in no way be considered an `isolate´ of the tiny organism we now call a virus. It was also strangely non-infectious for a so-called virus, for the monkeys were not paralyzed when made to drink it or when one of their limbs was injected with it, nor did they pass it on to other monkeys.
The experiment, in fact, shed no light on what had paralyzed the monkeys, and for that matter, the children.
Go here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=582) to read the rest of the article with undeniable evidence and decide for yourself.
Disclaimer: Posting articles does not necessarily endorse or agree with every opinion expressed in every article. All articles that are posted are aimed at getting people to think & consider the various issues, ideas & factual research presented.
Reprinted by permission
Presented by Bill Haymin, 2008
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Here are two highly provocative, and very thoughtful, articles on the truth about the lies underlying vaccination. There are some pretty provocative ideas surfacing (or re-surfacing) about the fraudulent nature of virology, vaccine research and statistical wizardry (some call it criminal distortion and intentional lies) involved in supporting the vigorous claims for vaccine effectiveness. Epidemics occur in fully vaccinated populations, not in unvaccinated ones. Polio vaccination predisposes for the development of Polio which is not caused by a virus. It is a form of environmental illness caused by DDT, organophosphates and other types of Pesticides, says Janine Roberts.
Go here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=582) to read the full article with undeniable evidence and decide for yourself.
Peter Mansfield's article ties vaccines like Hepatitis B to intentionally disseminated HIV/AIDS and presents chronology and citations to substantiate this often repeated contention. For example, "In 1977, Dr. Robert Gallo and the top Soviet Scientists meet to discuss the proliferation of the 15,000 gallons of AIDS. They attach AIDS as complement to the Small pox vaccine for Africa, and the "experimental" hepatitis B vaccine for Manhattan. According to authors June Goodfield and Alan Cantwell, it is Batch #751 that was administered in New York to thousands of innocent people."
Click here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=583) to read the full article and decide for yourself.
Below is an excerpt of the first article:
Polio Caused by Pesticides, Not Virus
Polio "Disappearance" Only Statistical Medical Fraud: depopulation covert op via vaccines
This article deconstructs the politics around creating the so-called ´polio vaccine success´ which is still widely heralded as a success. However, any simple cursory analysis of its history and the effects of the vaccine show that it was a dismal failure and that any success was based on medical fraud of reclassification of expanded cases of polio (filed away under other diseases) to make it appear that polio "went away." The World Health Organization does this to the present, despite skyrocketing ´polio´ everywhere. Widely known by the researchers even at the time, this is the story of the cover-up of the century: within this cover up, can be traced the expansion of using knowingly contaminated vaccines for depopulation everywhere.
POLIO DISAPPEARANCE IDEA IS ONLY STATISCIAL MEDICAL RECLASSIFICATION FRAUD TO HIDE POLLUTION VECTORS AND PESTICIDE VECTORS THAT CAUSED IT. POLIO SYMPTOMS CAN BE MYCOPLASMA AS WELL.
POLIO DISAPPEARANCE IDEA IS ONLY A COVER FOR SPREADING KNOWINGLY CONTAMINATED VACCINES WORLDWIDE–FROM ONLY US/UK LABS THAT KNOWINGLY USED MONKEY VIRUS CONTAMINATED SUPPLIES, AND THROUGH THE UNITED NATIONS W.H.O (WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION). W.H.O. ´VACCINES´ TESTED IN INDIA IN 2003 WERE FOUND TO BE LACED WITH INFERTILITY AND STERILITY AGENTS.
Polio Special Parts 1-4:
PART 1: A shot in the dark
Janine Roberts
from the UK Magazine The Ecologist (2004)
POLIO DISAPPEARANCE IDEA IS ONLY STATISCIAL MEDICAL RECLASSIFICATION FRAUD TO HIDE POLLUTION VECTORS
Date Published: 01/05/2004
Author: Janine Roberts
Polio is a devastating disease; the preferred method for fighting it is vaccination. Yet there is a mass of historic evidence that suggests it is not caused by a virus but by industrial and agricultural pollution.
During the first half of the 20th century infantile paralysis surged like a bush fire, moving from place to place, afflicting large numbers of children, but only in the industrialized West.
Prior to these outbreaks it affected very few and was often called `palsy´.
In the 19th century scientists gave it the name `poliomyelitis´, referring to the inflammation of the grey nerves of the spinal column in cases of paralysis. Poisonous metals were suspected of causing this disease, particularly lead, arsenic and mercury. In 1824 the English scientist John Cooke stated: `The fumes of these metals or the receptance of them in solution into the stomach, often cause paralysis.´ (2)
In 1878 the link between palsy and toxins was strengthened when Alfred Vulpian found that dogs dosed with lead suffered the same damage in their motor-neurone cells as found in the human victims of infantile paralysis.(3) The Russian Popow discovered in 1883 that the same damage could be done with arsenic.(4) This should have sent shockwaves through the medical establishment as the arsenic-based pesticide Paris Green had been widely used since 1870 to stop Codling moth caterpillars ruining apple crops. But strangely it didn´t.
In 1892 Paris Green was replaced in Massachusetts by the more toxic pesticide lead arsenate. Two years later the first recorded epidemic of infantile paralysis struck in Massachusetts´ neighboring state of Vermont.
The outbreak was investigated by Dr Charles Caverly, who reported that it was probably caused by a toxin rather than a micro-organism. Caverly said: `It usually occurred in families of more than one child, and as no efforts were made at isolation it was very certain it was non-contagious.´ (5)
Lead arsenate rapidly became the principal pesticide used on fruit and berries throughout the industrial world. In 1907 calcium arsenate was introduced for use primarily on cotton crops and in cotton mills. A year later 69 healthy children suddenly fell paralytically ill in Massachusetts. They lived in a town with three cotton mills and in settlements downstream from those mills. Nearby there were also orchards on which lead arsenates were almost certainly in use. They were also living only a short distance downstream from the location of the Vermont outbreak.
A further epidemic in Massachusetts in 1908 caused enormous public concern, but, despite the evidence that exposure to toxins might have been responsible, the investigating health officials overlooked the newly introduced pesticides; they thought them essential to their war against viruses and bacteria - and to the financial health of the agricultural industry.
Thus, the children paralyzed in Massachusetts were not treated with toxin antidotes to see if these would benefit them.
Instead, parents were advised to keep their children clean while the scientists, distracted by the then brand new theory that all epidemics had to be caused by infectious germs, looked for the virus `responsible´.
In 1908 two scientists working in Austria, Karl Landsteiner and Erwin Popper, reported that they might have found an `invisible virus´ that had caused these epidemics. They had made their discovery, they claimed, after making a suspension in water of minced diseased spinal cord from a nine-year-old victim of infantile paralysis. They had tested this noxious suspension by injecting one or two cups of it directly into the brains of two monkeys. The monkeys fell severely ill (as might have been predicted). One died and the other had its legs paralyzed. The scientists then dissected the monkeys and found damage in their central nervous tissues similar to that found in human cases of infantile paralysis.(8)
Today the World Health Organization (WHO) still credits Landsteiner and Popper as having found the poliovirus with this experiment.
Why it does so is inexplicable.
The fluid they injected must have contained much human cellular debris, any toxins involved in the child´s illness, and probably several kinds of viruses. So, it was no wonder the monkeys fell so desperately ill. Such a soup could in no way be considered an `isolate´ of the tiny organism we now call a virus. It was also strangely non-infectious for a so-called virus, for the monkeys were not paralyzed when made to drink it or when one of their limbs was injected with it, nor did they pass it on to other monkeys.
The experiment, in fact, shed no light on what had paralyzed the monkeys, and for that matter, the children.
Go here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=582) to read the rest of the article with undeniable evidence and decide for yourself.
Disclaimer: Posting articles does not necessarily endorse or agree with every opinion expressed in every article. All articles that are posted are aimed at getting people to think & consider the various issues, ideas & factual research presented.
Reprinted by permission
Presented by Bill Haymin, 2008
